Diagnostic Accuracy and Reproducibility of Predicting Cul-de-Sac Obliteration by General Gynaecologists and Minimally Invasive Gynaecologic Surgeons.
Rectouterine pouch
diagnostic accuracy
interobserver agreement
intraobserver agreement
reproducibility study
Journal
Journal of obstetrics and gynaecology Canada : JOGC = Journal d'obstetrique et gynecologie du Canada : JOGC
ISSN: 1701-2163
Titre abrégé: J Obstet Gynaecol Can
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 101126664
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
14
05
2018
revised:
04
06
2018
accepted:
06
06
2018
pubmed:
27
10
2018
medline:
29
7
2020
entrez:
27
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Knowledge of rectouterine cul-de-sac state and consistent classification among surgeons are important in the surgical management of women with endometriosis. The objective of this study was to determine the diagnostic accuracy and interobserver and intraobserver agreement among general gynaecologists (GGs) and minimally invasive gynaecologic surgeons (MIGSs) in the prediction of cul-de-sac obliteration at off-line analysis of laparoscopic videos. Five GGs and five MIGSs viewed 33 prerecorded laparoscopic video sets off-line to determine cul-de-sac obliteration state (non-obliterated, partially obliterated, or completely obliterated) on two occasions (at least 7days apart). Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver and intraobserver agreement were evaluated. The interobserver agreements for all 10 observers for the description of cul-de-sac state ranged from fair to substantial agreement, with moderate overall agreement. MIGSs had slightly higher within-group interobserver agreement compared with GGs. MIGSs achieved overall almost perfect intraobserver agreement compared with substantial agreement for GGs. The accuracy, sensitivity, specificity, positive predictive value, and negative predictive value for MIGSs classifying the cul-de-sac state were 83.9%, 88.5%, 88.5%, 89.2%, 92.0%, and 84.7%, respectively, whereas for GGs, they were 79.1%, 79.4%, 88.1%, 89.9%, and 76.1%, respectively. Diagnostic accuracy and interobserver and intraobserver agreement for cul-de-sac obliteration state classification is acceptable in both groups. MIGSs had greater diagnostic accuracy and exhibited high interobserver and intraobserver agreement, a finding suggesting that their advanced training makes them more reliable in cul-de-sac obliteration assessment. Partial cul-de-sac obliteration was the most commonly incorrectly diagnosed state, thus implying that partial obliteration is not well understood.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30361156
pii: S1701-2163(18)30564-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jogc.2018.06.023
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
443-449.e2Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The Society of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists of Canada/La Société des obstétriciens et gynécologues du Canada. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.