A framework for constraining image SNR loss due to MR raw data compression.
Algorithms
Computer Simulation
Data Compression
/ methods
Humans
Image Enhancement
/ methods
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Image Processing, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging
/ methods
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
/ methods
Phantoms, Imaging
Signal-To-Noise Ratio
Software
Cloud
Compression
Gadgetron
Real time
Software
Journal
Magma (New York, N.Y.)
ISSN: 1352-8661
Titre abrégé: MAGMA
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9310752
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
02
07
2018
accepted:
15
10
2018
revised:
03
10
2018
pubmed:
27
10
2018
medline:
28
7
2019
entrez:
27
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Computationally intensive image reconstruction algorithms can be used online during MRI exams by streaming data to remote high-performance computers. However, data acquisition rates often exceed the bandwidth of the available network resources creating a bottleneck. Data compression is, therefore, desired to ensure fast data transmission. The added noise variance due to compression was determined through statistical analysis for two compression libraries (one custom and one generic) that were implemented in this framework. Limiting the compression error variance relative to the measured thermal noise allowed for image signal-to-noise ratio loss to be explicitly constrained. Achievable compression ratios are dependent on image SNR, user-defined SNR loss tolerance, and acquisition type. However, a 1% reduction in SNR yields approximately four to ninefold compression ratios across MRI acquisition strategies. For free-breathing cine data reconstructed in the cloud, the streaming bandwidth was reduced from 37 to 6.1 MB/s, alleviating the network transmission bottleneck. Our framework enabled data compression for online reconstructions and allowed SNR loss to be constrained based on a user-defined SNR tolerance. This practical tool will enable real-time data streaming and greater than fourfold faster cloud upload times.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30361947
doi: 10.1007/s10334-018-0709-5
pii: 10.1007/s10334-018-0709-5
pmc: PMC8351621
mid: NIHMS1719645
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
213-225Subventions
Organisme : Intramural NIH HHS
ID : Z99 HL999999
Pays : United States
Références
Magn Reson Med. 2018 Jun;79(6):3055-3071
pubmed: 29115689
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Nov 14;15:102
pubmed: 24228930
Magn Reson Med. 2017 Jan;77(1):411-421
pubmed: 26822475
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 Mar;41(3):573-85
pubmed: 24962650
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Jun;69(6):1768-76
pubmed: 22791598
Magn Reson Med. 2014 Mar;71(3):990-1001
pubmed: 23649942
Magn Reson Med. 1997 Nov;38(5):852-7
pubmed: 9358462
IEEE Trans Vis Comput Graph. 2014 Dec;20(12):2674-83
pubmed: 26356981
Magn Reson Med. 2001 Oct;46(4):638-51
pubmed: 11590639
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2018 Jun;37(6):1289-1296
pubmed: 29870359
Magn Reson Med. 2005 Dec;54(6):1439-47
pubmed: 16261576
J Digit Imaging. 2018 Oct;31(5):670-679
pubmed: 29524154
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 1988;7(4):368-80
pubmed: 18230491
Nature. 2018 Mar 21;555(7697):487-492
pubmed: 29565357
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2016 Feb 25;18:10
pubmed: 26915830
Invest Radiol. 2016 Jun;51(6):349-64
pubmed: 27003227
Magn Reson Med. 2015 Mar;73(3):1015-25
pubmed: 24687458