Distinct Clinicopathologic Characteristics and Prognosis Based on the Presence of Ground Glass Opacity Component in Clinical Stage IA Lung Adenocarcinoma.


Journal

Journal of thoracic oncology : official publication of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer
ISSN: 1556-1380
Titre abrégé: J Thorac Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101274235

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
received: 22 03 2018
revised: 24 09 2018
accepted: 27 09 2018
pubmed: 28 10 2018
medline: 9 4 2020
entrez: 28 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

We evaluated differences in the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognosis based on the presence of ground glass opacity (GGO) components in small-sized lung adenocarcinoma. We retrospectively investigated 634 lung adenocarcinomas classed as c-stage IA in the eighth edition TNM classification. Staging was defined according to the solid component size measured by thin-section computed tomography. All tumors were grouped into either a GGO or solid group, based on the presence of a GGO component. Of the cases, 215 (34%) were classed as c-stage IA1 (T1mi: 88, T1a-GGO: 102, T1a-solid: 25), 255 (40%) as c-stage IA2 (T1b-GGO: 122, T1b-solid: 133), and 164 (26%) as c-stage IA3 (T1c-GGO: 44, T1c-solid: 120). Among the 546 c-stage IA cases excluding the T1mi lesions, Cox regression analysis revealed that presence of GGO was an independently significant prognosticator (p = 0.024). The result was validated in 494 c-stage IA lung adenocarcinomas with a nonpredominant GGO component, showing the presence of GGO as a significant prognosticator (p = 0.048). When we evaluated the prognostic impact of GGO presence in each clinical stage, the 5-year overall survival (OS) was significantly different between the GGO and solid groups (IA1: 97.8% versus 86.6%, p = 0.026; IA2: 89.3% versus 75.2%, p = 0.007; IA3: 88.5% versus 62.3%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the 5-year overall survival b was distinct in parallel similar pathologic findings when comparing a lepidic versus an invasive component (IA1: 97.9% versus 85.6%, p = 0.031; IA2: 86.1% versus 69.4%, p = 0.007; IA3: 77.5% versus 55.8%, p < 0.001). Clinicopathologic and oncologic outcomes were disparate based on the presence of a GGO component in the eighth edition TNM classification of c-stage IA lung adenocarcinoma.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30368010
pii: S1556-0864(18)33178-2
doi: 10.1016/j.jtho.2018.09.026
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

265-275

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Aritoshi Hattori (A)

Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan. Electronic address: ahattori@juntendo.ac.jp.

Shunki Hirayama (S)

Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Takeshi Matsunaga (T)

Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Takuo Hayashi (T)

Department of Human Pathology, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kazuya Takamochi (K)

Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Shiaki Oh (S)

Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Kenji Suzuki (K)

Department of General Thoracic Surgery, Juntendo University School of Medicine, Tokyo, Japan.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH