The Impact of Social Media on Negative Online Physician Reviews: an Observational Study in a Large, Academic, Multispecialty Practice.
internet
online
physician reviews
social media
Journal
Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
25
07
2018
accepted:
19
10
2018
revised:
30
08
2018
pubmed:
31
10
2018
medline:
21
4
2020
entrez:
31
10
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Online reviews of physicians are becoming increasingly common, however no correlation of these reviews to formal patient satisfaction surveys. With the explosion of social media, it is unknown as to how this form of communication may have a role in potentially managing and addressing the search position of negative online reviews. We obtained a list of 102 physicians with negative online reviews between September 2014 and December 2014. Social media uptake and average Google search position of the physician and their respective negative online reviews were assessed from January 2015 through January 2017. Fifty-four (53%) physicians had any social media presence in January 2015. All 102 physicians were subsequently offered social media coaching by the Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media which resulted in an increase to 90% of these physicians participating in social media by January 2017. The average Google search position for the negative online reviews was significantly reduced from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 14.3 ± 11.3 (P < 0.001) from 2015 to 2017. There was a moderate increase in Doximity uptake during that time increasing from 11% of the physicians having a claimed profile to 80%. There were non-significant reductions in the average Google search position - 9.7 ± 11.3 in the physicians who had an existing a social media presence versus those who were not on social media - 4.2 ± 2.2 (P = 0.11). Physician social media presence can reduce the bearing of negative online comments by decreasing the search position of these comments.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Online reviews of physicians are becoming increasingly common, however no correlation of these reviews to formal patient satisfaction surveys. With the explosion of social media, it is unknown as to how this form of communication may have a role in potentially managing and addressing the search position of negative online reviews.
METHODS
We obtained a list of 102 physicians with negative online reviews between September 2014 and December 2014. Social media uptake and average Google search position of the physician and their respective negative online reviews were assessed from January 2015 through January 2017.
RESULTS
Fifty-four (53%) physicians had any social media presence in January 2015. All 102 physicians were subsequently offered social media coaching by the Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media which resulted in an increase to 90% of these physicians participating in social media by January 2017. The average Google search position for the negative online reviews was significantly reduced from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 14.3 ± 11.3 (P < 0.001) from 2015 to 2017. There was a moderate increase in Doximity uptake during that time increasing from 11% of the physicians having a claimed profile to 80%. There were non-significant reductions in the average Google search position - 9.7 ± 11.3 in the physicians who had an existing a social media presence versus those who were not on social media - 4.2 ± 2.2 (P = 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS
Physician social media presence can reduce the bearing of negative online comments by decreasing the search position of these comments.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30374885
doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4720-3
pii: 10.1007/s11606-018-4720-3
pmc: PMC6318187
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Observational Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
98-101Références
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Sep;155(3):411-5
pubmed: 27221579
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 May;18(5):286-95
pubmed: 25965862
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Apr;93(4):453-457
pubmed: 29622095
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 01;15(2):e24
pubmed: 23372115
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Feb;32(1):1-5
pubmed: 30030764
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 13;18(12):e324
pubmed: 27965191
J Card Fail. 2017 Nov;23(11):809-812
pubmed: 28712954