The Impact of Social Media on Negative Online Physician Reviews: an Observational Study in a Large, Academic, Multispecialty Practice.


Journal

Journal of general internal medicine
ISSN: 1525-1497
Titre abrégé: J Gen Intern Med
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8605834

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 2019
Historique:
received: 25 07 2018
accepted: 19 10 2018
revised: 30 08 2018
pubmed: 31 10 2018
medline: 21 4 2020
entrez: 31 10 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Online reviews of physicians are becoming increasingly common, however no correlation of these reviews to formal patient satisfaction surveys. With the explosion of social media, it is unknown as to how this form of communication may have a role in potentially managing and addressing the search position of negative online reviews. We obtained a list of 102 physicians with negative online reviews between September 2014 and December 2014. Social media uptake and average Google search position of the physician and their respective negative online reviews were assessed from January 2015 through January 2017. Fifty-four (53%) physicians had any social media presence in January 2015. All 102 physicians were subsequently offered social media coaching by the Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media which resulted in an increase to 90% of these physicians participating in social media by January 2017. The average Google search position for the negative online reviews was significantly reduced from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 14.3 ± 11.3 (P < 0.001) from 2015 to 2017. There was a moderate increase in Doximity uptake during that time increasing from 11% of the physicians having a claimed profile to 80%. There were non-significant reductions in the average Google search position - 9.7 ± 11.3 in the physicians who had an existing a social media presence versus those who were not on social media - 4.2 ± 2.2 (P = 0.11). Physician social media presence can reduce the bearing of negative online comments by decreasing the search position of these comments.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Online reviews of physicians are becoming increasingly common, however no correlation of these reviews to formal patient satisfaction surveys. With the explosion of social media, it is unknown as to how this form of communication may have a role in potentially managing and addressing the search position of negative online reviews.
METHODS
We obtained a list of 102 physicians with negative online reviews between September 2014 and December 2014. Social media uptake and average Google search position of the physician and their respective negative online reviews were assessed from January 2015 through January 2017.
RESULTS
Fifty-four (53%) physicians had any social media presence in January 2015. All 102 physicians were subsequently offered social media coaching by the Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media which resulted in an increase to 90% of these physicians participating in social media by January 2017. The average Google search position for the negative online reviews was significantly reduced from 5.2 ± 2.5 to 14.3 ± 11.3 (P < 0.001) from 2015 to 2017. There was a moderate increase in Doximity uptake during that time increasing from 11% of the physicians having a claimed profile to 80%. There were non-significant reductions in the average Google search position - 9.7 ± 11.3 in the physicians who had an existing a social media presence versus those who were not on social media - 4.2 ± 2.2 (P = 0.11).
CONCLUSIONS
Physician social media presence can reduce the bearing of negative online comments by decreasing the search position of these comments.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30374885
doi: 10.1007/s11606-018-4720-3
pii: 10.1007/s11606-018-4720-3
pmc: PMC6318187
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

98-101

Références

Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2016 Sep;155(3):411-5
pubmed: 27221579
Cyberpsychol Behav Soc Netw. 2015 May;18(5):286-95
pubmed: 25965862
Mayo Clin Proc. 2018 Apr;93(4):453-457
pubmed: 29622095
J Med Internet Res. 2013 Feb 01;15(2):e24
pubmed: 23372115
J Digit Imaging. 2019 Feb;32(1):1-5
pubmed: 30030764
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 13;18(12):e324
pubmed: 27965191
J Card Fail. 2017 Nov;23(11):809-812
pubmed: 28712954

Auteurs

R Jay Widmer (RJ)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA. robert.widmer@BSWHealth.org.
Department of Internal Medicine, Baylor Scott and White Health, Temple, TX, USA. robert.widmer@BSWHealth.org.

Margaret Shepard (M)

Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Lee A Aase (LA)

Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

John T Wald (JT)

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Sandhya Pruthi (S)

Department of General Internal Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Farris K Timimi (FK)

Department of Cardiovascular Medicine, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.
Mayo Clinic Center for Social Media, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH