Processive flow by biased polymerization mediates the slow axonal transport of actin.


Journal

The Journal of cell biology
ISSN: 1540-8140
Titre abrégé: J Cell Biol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0375356

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 01 2019
Historique:
received: 04 11 2017
revised: 02 09 2018
accepted: 25 10 2018
pubmed: 8 11 2018
medline: 23 10 2019
entrez: 8 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Classic pulse-chase studies have shown that actin is conveyed in slow axonal transport, but the mechanistic basis for this movement is unknown. Recently, we reported that axonal actin was surprisingly dynamic, with focal assembly/disassembly events ("actin hotspots") and elongating polymers along the axon shaft ("actin trails"). Using a combination of live imaging, superresolution microscopy, and modeling, in this study, we explore how these dynamic structures can lead to processive transport of actin. We found relatively more actin trails elongated anterogradely as well as an overall slow, anterogradely biased flow of actin in axon shafts. Starting with first principles of monomer/filament assembly and incorporating imaging data, we generated a quantitative model simulating axonal hotspots and trails. Our simulations predict that the axonal actin dynamics indeed lead to a slow anterogradely biased flow of the population. Collectively, the data point to a surprising scenario where local assembly and biased polymerization generate the slow axonal transport of actin without involvement of microtubules (MTs) or MT-based motors. Mechanistically distinct from polymer sliding, this might be a general strategy to convey highly dynamic cytoskeletal cargoes.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30401699
pii: jcb.201711022
doi: 10.1083/jcb.201711022
pmc: PMC6314539
doi:

Substances chimiques

Actins 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

112-124

Subventions

Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : P50 AG033514
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2018 Chakrabarty et al.

Références

Trends Cell Biol. 1997 Oct;7(10):384-8
pubmed: 17708986
Nat Commun. 2013;4:2550
pubmed: 24096541
Chem Biol. 2009 Nov 25;16(11):1158-68
pubmed: 19942139
J Neurosci. 2000 Sep 15;20(18):6849-61
pubmed: 10995829
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2018 Aug;51:163-167
pubmed: 30005298
EMBO J. 2011 Feb 2;30(3):456-67
pubmed: 21217643
J Neurobiol. 2004 Jan;58(1):92-102
pubmed: 14598373
FEBS Lett. 1988 Aug 1;235(1-2):211-4
pubmed: 2969829
Dev Neurobiol. 2010 Jul;70(8):565-88
pubmed: 20506164
J Neurocytol. 2000 Nov-Dec;29(11-12):889-911
pubmed: 11466477
J Struct Biol. 2012 Jan;177(1):32-9
pubmed: 22056467
J Neurosci. 1986 Jun;6(6):1593-605
pubmed: 2423662
Brain Res. 1979 Aug 10;171(3):401-13
pubmed: 89886
Nat Cell Biol. 2000 Mar;2(3):137-41
pubmed: 10707083
J Cell Biol. 2005 Feb 28;168(5):697-703
pubmed: 15728192
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 2013 Feb;25(1):107-15
pubmed: 22985541
Mol Biol Cell. 1992 Sep;3(9):1015-24
pubmed: 1330091
Front Mol Neurosci. 2015 Aug 14;8:44
pubmed: 26321907
J Neurosci. 2013 Sep 25;33(39):15362-75
pubmed: 24068803
Neuron. 2011 May 12;70(3):441-54
pubmed: 21555071
Nat Protoc. 2011 Dec 15;7(1):62-8
pubmed: 22179592
Exp Cell Res. 2007 Jun 10;313(10):2110-20
pubmed: 17451679
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Dec 5;92(25):11500-3
pubmed: 8524791
Biochemistry. 2002 Jan 15;41(2):597-602
pubmed: 11781099
Nat Commun. 2017 Sep 21;8(1):655
pubmed: 28935896
J Cell Biol. 1993 Feb;120(4):923-34
pubmed: 8432732
J Cell Biol. 1984 Jun;98(6):2064-76
pubmed: 6202702
Traffic. 2018 Mar;19(3):166-181
pubmed: 29178177
Science. 2013 Jan 25;339(6118):452-6
pubmed: 23239625
Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol. 2000 Nov;1(2):153-6
pubmed: 11253369
EMBO J. 2010 Feb 17;29(4):843-54
pubmed: 20111006
Cell. 2014 Mar 27;157(1):26-40
pubmed: 24679524
Neuron. 2014 Oct 22;84(2):292-309
pubmed: 25374356
Bioinformatics. 2014 Aug 15;30(16):2389-90
pubmed: 24771516
Nature. 1990 Feb 1;343(6257):479-82
pubmed: 1689016
J Biol Chem. 2004 Feb 13;279(7):5194-9
pubmed: 14623892
J Cell Biol. 2017 Jul 3;216(7):2059-2074
pubmed: 28559423
J Neurochem. 2014 Apr;129(2):221-34
pubmed: 24164353
J Cell Biol. 1991 Aug;114(3):503-13
pubmed: 1860882
Brain Res. 1999 Mar 27;823(1-2):129-40
pubmed: 10095019
Elife. 2014 Dec 23;3:
pubmed: 25535840
Biophys J. 2008 Aug;95(4):1627-38
pubmed: 18502800
Curr Biol. 2002 Sep 3;12(17):1496-1501
pubmed: 12225664
Methods Cell Biol. 2016;131:91-106
pubmed: 26794509
Science. 1996 Aug 9;273(5276):784-8
pubmed: 8670416
Biophys J. 1998 Oct;75(4):2070-8
pubmed: 9746549
Neuroscientist. 2014 Feb;20(1):71-81
pubmed: 23912032
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 May 24;113(21):6029-34
pubmed: 27162329
Methods Mol Biol. 2014;1148:203-15
pubmed: 24718803
Curr Opin Cell Biol. 1995 Feb;7(1):102-10
pubmed: 7755981
Biophys J. 1986 Jan;49(1):149-51
pubmed: 19431625
Mol Neurobiol. 1992 Summer-Fall;6(2-3):301-11
pubmed: 1282336
J Neurosci Res. 1991 Sep;30(1):134-53
pubmed: 1795398
J Cell Biol. 2015 Aug 3;210(3):401-17
pubmed: 26216902
J Neurosci. 2005 Jul 27;25(30):7014-21
pubmed: 16049177
Metab Brain Dis. 1988 Mar;3(1):49-65
pubmed: 3211075
J Biol Chem. 2000 Sep 8;275(36):28120-7
pubmed: 10859320
Trends Cell Biol. 1997 Oct;7(10):380-4
pubmed: 17708985
Cell Motil Cytoskeleton. 2007 Nov;64(11):822-32
pubmed: 17685442
J Biol Chem. 1998 Oct 2;273(40):25602-11
pubmed: 9748225
Annu Rev Biochem. 2007;76:593-627
pubmed: 17373907
Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 3;25(15):R677-91
pubmed: 26241148
J Vis Exp. 2011 Mar 17;(49):
pubmed: 21445046
Biochemistry. 1986 Dec 2;25(24):7789-92
pubmed: 3801442
Mol Cell Neurosci. 2018 Sep;91:151-159
pubmed: 29758267
Cell Rep. 2015 Dec 29;13(12):2781-93
pubmed: 26711344
Cell. 2004 Aug 6;118(3):363-73
pubmed: 15294161
Cell. 2000 Sep 29;103(1):141-55
pubmed: 11051554

Auteurs

Nilaj Chakrabarty (N)

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Neuroscience Program and Quantitative Biology Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH.

Pankaj Dubey (P)

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

Yong Tang (Y)

Department of Molecular and Cellular Physiology, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA.

Archan Ganguly (A)

Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.

Kelsey Ladt (K)

Department of Neurosciences, University of California, San Diego, La Jolla, CA.

Christophe Leterrier (C)

Aix-Marseille Université, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Institut Neurophysiopathol, NeuroCyto, Marseille, France christophe.leterrier@univ-amu.fr.

Peter Jung (P)

Department of Physics and Astronomy, Neuroscience Program and Quantitative Biology Institute, Ohio University, Athens, OH jungp@ohio.edu.

Subhojit Roy (S)

Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI roy27@wisc.edu.
Department of Neuroscience, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH