Anterograde colonic irrigations by percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy in refractory colorectal functional disorders.
Colorectal functional disorders
Constipation
Endoscopic treatment
Fecal incontinence
Journal
International journal of colorectal disease
ISSN: 1432-1262
Titre abrégé: Int J Colorectal Dis
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 8607899
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jan 2019
Jan 2019
Historique:
accepted:
22
10
2018
pubmed:
9
11
2018
medline:
16
4
2019
entrez:
9
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
In case reports or small studies, percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy (PEC) has been proposed as an alternative to the Malone intervention to perform antegrade colonic enemas. Our goal was to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and tolerance of PEC in a large group of patients with refractory colorectal functional disorders. From September 2006 to April 2014, all patients undergoing PEC for constipation, fecal incontinence, and incontinence after rectal resection in two expert centers were studied. The PEC procedure consisted in anchoring the caecum to the abdominal wall (caecopexy) and placing a specifically designed tube in the colonic lumen to perform antegrade enemas. The quality of life (GIQLI), constipation (Kess), and incontinence (Cleveland) scores were assessed before PEC and at 3, 6, 12, and 24 months. A total of 69 patients were included. GIQLI scores were significantly improved in constipation group (n = 43), incontinence group (n = 19), and rectal resection group (n = 10). In the constipation group, Kess score decreased from 25.9 before PEC to 20.6 at 2 years (p = 0.01). In the incontinence and post-rectal resection groups, Cleveland scores decreased from 14.3 before PEC to 2.7 at 6 months (p = 0.01) and to 10.4 at 2 years (p = 0.04). Overall, PEC was considered successful by patients in 58%, 74%, and 90% of cases, in constipation, incontinence, and rectal resection groups, respectively. Chronic pain (52%) at the catheter site was the most frequent complication. Percutaneous endoscopic caecostomy for antegrade colonic enemas improves significantly the quality of life of patients with colorectal disorder refractory to medical treatment.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30406317
doi: 10.1007/s00384-018-3183-7
pii: 10.1007/s00384-018-3183-7
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
169-175Références
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 1999 Jan;23(1):25-31
pubmed: 10219601
Am J Gastroenterol. 2000 Oct;95(10):2852-7
pubmed: 11051359
Dis Colon Rectum. 2000 Oct;43(10):1419-26
pubmed: 11052520
Br J Surg. 2001 Dec;88(12):1637-8
pubmed: 11736978
Colorectal Dis. 2004 Sep;6(5):362-8
pubmed: 15335371
Gastrointest Endosc. 2006 Apr;63(4):666-73
pubmed: 16564870
Colorectal Dis. 2007 May;9(4):373-6
pubmed: 17432993
Urology. 2008 Nov;72(5):1026-9
pubmed: 18533228
Lancet. 1990 Nov 17;336(8725):1217-8
pubmed: 1978072
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2010 May;31(9):938-49
pubmed: 20180788
Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2010 Mar;34(3):209-12
pubmed: 20299171
Clin Anat. 2011 May;24(4):454-61
pubmed: 21509811
J Urol. 2013 Jun;189(6):2293-7
pubmed: 23270910
Surg Endosc. 2015 Mar;29(3):620-6
pubmed: 25030476
Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2015 Dec;42(11-12):1281-93
pubmed: 26423574
Br J Surg. 1995 Feb;82(2):216-22
pubmed: 7749697
Br J Surg. 1994 Aug;81(8):1215
pubmed: 7953366
Dis Colon Rectum. 1993 Jan;36(1):77-97
pubmed: 8416784
Br J Surg. 1996 Apr;83(4):507-8
pubmed: 8665243
J Am Coll Surg. 1997 Dec;185(6):544-7
pubmed: 9404877