Moral distress in paediatric oncology: Contributing factors and group differences.
Moral distress
Sweden
health processionals
oncology
questionnaire
Journal
Nursing ethics
ISSN: 1477-0989
Titre abrégé: Nurs Ethics
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9433357
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
10
11
2018
medline:
31
3
2020
entrez:
10
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Providing oncological care to children is demanding and ethical issues concerning what is best for the child can contribute to moral distress. To explore healthcare professionals' experiences of situations that generate moral distress in Swedish paediatric oncology. In this national study, data collection was conducted using the Swedish Moral Distress Scale-Revised. The data analysis included descriptive statistics and non-parametric analysis of differences between groups. Healthcare professionals at all paediatric oncology centres in Sweden were invited to participate. A total of 278 healthcare professionals participated. The response rate was 89%. In its advisory statement, the Regional Ethical Review Board decided that the study was of such a nature that the legislation concerning ethical reviews was not applicable. All participants received written information about the aim of the study and confidentiality. Participants demonstrated their consent by returning the survey. The two situations with the highest moral distress scores concerned lack of competence and continuity of personnel. All professional groups reported high levels of disturbance. Nurses rated significantly higher frequencies and higher total Moral Distress Scale scores compared to medical doctors and nursing assistants. Lack of competence and continuity, as the two most morally distressing situations, confirms the findings of studies from other countries, where inadequate staffing was reported as being among the top five morally distressing situations. The levels of total Moral Distress Scale scores were more similar to those reported in intensive care units than in other paediatric care settings. The two most morally distressing situations, lack of competence and continuity, are both organisational in nature. Thus, clinical ethics support services need to be combined with organisational improvements in order to reduce moral distress, thereby maintaining job satisfaction, preventing a high turnover of staff and ensuring the quality of care.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Providing oncological care to children is demanding and ethical issues concerning what is best for the child can contribute to moral distress.
OBJECTIVES
OBJECTIVE
To explore healthcare professionals' experiences of situations that generate moral distress in Swedish paediatric oncology.
RESEARCH DESIGN
METHODS
In this national study, data collection was conducted using the Swedish Moral Distress Scale-Revised. The data analysis included descriptive statistics and non-parametric analysis of differences between groups.
PARTICIPANTS AND RESEARCH CONTEXT
METHODS
Healthcare professionals at all paediatric oncology centres in Sweden were invited to participate. A total of 278 healthcare professionals participated. The response rate was 89%.
ETHICAL CONSIDERATIONS
METHODS
In its advisory statement, the Regional Ethical Review Board decided that the study was of such a nature that the legislation concerning ethical reviews was not applicable. All participants received written information about the aim of the study and confidentiality. Participants demonstrated their consent by returning the survey.
FINDINGS
RESULTS
The two situations with the highest moral distress scores concerned lack of competence and continuity of personnel. All professional groups reported high levels of disturbance. Nurses rated significantly higher frequencies and higher total Moral Distress Scale scores compared to medical doctors and nursing assistants.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
Lack of competence and continuity, as the two most morally distressing situations, confirms the findings of studies from other countries, where inadequate staffing was reported as being among the top five morally distressing situations. The levels of total Moral Distress Scale scores were more similar to those reported in intensive care units than in other paediatric care settings.
CONCLUSION
CONCLUSIONS
The two most morally distressing situations, lack of competence and continuity, are both organisational in nature. Thus, clinical ethics support services need to be combined with organisational improvements in order to reduce moral distress, thereby maintaining job satisfaction, preventing a high turnover of staff and ensuring the quality of care.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30411660
doi: 10.1177/0969733018809806
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng