HLA-DR/DQ molecular mismatch: A prognostic biomarker for primary alloimmunity.
Adult
Biomarkers
/ blood
Child
Epitopes
/ chemistry
Female
HLA-DQ Antigens
/ chemistry
HLA-DR Antigens
/ chemistry
Histocompatibility Testing
Humans
Isoantigens
/ chemistry
Kidney Transplantation
/ adverse effects
Male
Middle Aged
Models, Molecular
Prognosis
Risk Factors
Tissue Donors
Transplantation Immunology
clinical research/practice
clinical trial design
histocompatibility
kidney transplantation/nephrology
major histocompatibility complex (MHC)
rejection: T cell mediated (TCMR)
rejection: antibody-mediated (ABMR)
risk assessment/risk stratification
Journal
American journal of transplantation : official journal of the American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons
ISSN: 1600-6143
Titre abrégé: Am J Transplant
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100968638
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
06 2019
06 2019
Historique:
received:
29
08
2018
revised:
11
10
2018
accepted:
04
11
2018
pubmed:
11
11
2018
medline:
15
7
2020
entrez:
11
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Alloimmune risk stratification in renal transplantation has lacked the necessary prognostic biomarkers to personalize recipient care or optimize clinical trials. HLA molecular mismatch improves precision compared to traditional antigen mismatch but has not been studied in detail at the individual molecule level. This study evaluated 664 renal transplant recipients and correlated HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet mismatch with serologic, histologic, and clinical outcomes. Compared to traditional HLA-DR/DQ whole antigen mismatch, HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet mismatch improved the correlation with de novo donor-specific antibody development (area under the curve 0.54 vs 0.84) and allowed recipients to be stratified into low, intermediate, and high alloimmune risk categories. These risk categories were significantly correlated with primary alloimmune events including Banff ≥1A T cell-mediated rejection (P = .0006), HLA-DR/DQ de novo donor-specific antibody development (P < .0001), antibody-mediated rejection (P < .0001), as well as all-cause graft loss (P = .0012) and each of these correlations persisted in multivariate models. Thus, HLA-DR/DQ single molecule eplet mismatch may represent a precise, reproducible, and widely available prognostic biomarker that can be applied to tailor immunosuppression or design clinical trials based on individual patient risk.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30414349
doi: 10.1111/ajt.15177
pmc: PMC6563434
pii: S1600-6135(22)09115-8
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Epitopes
0
HLA-DQ Antigens
0
HLA-DR Antigens
0
Isoantigens
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1708-1719Subventions
Organisme : Research Manitoba
Pays : International
Organisme : Department of Health
ID : PDF-2016-09-065
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Organisme : National Institute for Health Research
Pays : International
Organisme : Evelyn Trust
Pays : International
Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors American Journal of Transplantation published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of The American Society of Transplantation and the American Society of Transplant Surgeons.
Références
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2015 Dec;26(12):3114-22
pubmed: 25925687
Am J Transplant. 2017 May;17(5):1370-1379
pubmed: 27862923
Am J Transplant. 2018 Mar;18(3):564-573
pubmed: 29288623
Nat Rev Clin Oncol. 2014 Feb;11(2):81-90
pubmed: 24281059
Am J Transplant. 2018 Sep;18(9):2120-2134
pubmed: 29943908
Transplantation. 2017 Jul;101(7):1527-1534
pubmed: 28207630
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jul;18(7):1615-1625
pubmed: 29603637
Am J Transplant. 2015 Aug;15(8):2197-202
pubmed: 26095765
Am J Transplant. 2014 Feb;14(2):255-71
pubmed: 24401076
Am J Transplant. 2017 Aug;17(8):2092-2102
pubmed: 28245084
Am J Transplant. 2013 Dec;13(12):3114-22
pubmed: 24164958
Am J Transplant. 2009 Nov;9 Suppl 3:S1-155
pubmed: 19845597
J Am Soc Nephrol. 2017 Nov;28(11):3353-3362
pubmed: 28729289
Am J Transplant. 2016 Apr;16(4):1094-101
pubmed: 26730885
Am J Transplant. 2012 May;12(5):1157-67
pubmed: 22429309
Hum Immunol. 2011 Nov;72(11):1049-59
pubmed: 21840357
Transpl Int. 2018 Feb;31(2):198-211
pubmed: 28987015
Transplantation. 2016 May;100(5):1094-102
pubmed: 26901078
Hum Immunol. 2007 Jan;68(1):12-25
pubmed: 17207708
Am J Transplant. 2018 Jul;18(7):1604-1614
pubmed: 29603613
Am J Transplant. 2015 Nov;15(11):2921-30
pubmed: 26096305
Am J Transplant. 2019 Jun;19(6):1708-1719
pubmed: 30414349
Am J Transplant. 2016 Nov;16(11):3255-3261
pubmed: 27367750
Surg Forum. 1956;6:432-6
pubmed: 13391513
Am J Transplant. 2015 Jan;15(1):137-48
pubmed: 25521856
Transplantation. 2017 Apr;101(4S Suppl 2):S1-S56
pubmed: 28328734
Transplantation. 2018 Aug;102(8):1338-1343
pubmed: 29443827
Am J Transplant. 2016 Jul;16(7):2139-47
pubmed: 26755448
Am J Transplant. 2006 Oct;6(10):2307-15
pubmed: 16939516
Transplantation. 2013 Jan 15;95(1):19-47
pubmed: 23238534