Is SBRT Boost Feasible for PET Positive Lymph Nodes for Cervical Cancer? Evaluation using Tumor Control Probability and QUANTEC Criteria.
Antineoplastic Combined Chemotherapy Protocols
/ therapeutic use
Brachytherapy
/ adverse effects
Chemoradiotherapy
/ methods
Feasibility Studies
Female
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Lymph Nodes
/ diagnostic imaging
Lymphatic Metastasis
/ diagnostic imaging
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Recurrence, Local
/ epidemiology
Organs at Risk
/ radiation effects
Positron-Emission Tomography
/ methods
Radiosurgery
/ adverse effects
Radiotherapy Dosage
Radiotherapy Planning, Computer-Assisted
Radiotherapy, Intensity-Modulated
/ adverse effects
Retrospective Studies
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Treatment Outcome
Uterine Cervical Neoplasms
/ diagnostic imaging
Journal
Practical radiation oncology
ISSN: 1879-8519
Titre abrégé: Pract Radiat Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101558279
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
11
04
2018
revised:
01
10
2018
accepted:
29
10
2018
pubmed:
12
11
2018
medline:
6
4
2019
entrez:
12
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
This study aimed to examine the feasibility of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) as an external beam radiation therapy boost to positron emission tomography (PET) positive lymph nodes (LN) in patients with cervical cancer and to evaluate overall tumor control probability (TCP) increase. Ten patients with cervical cancer and PET positive LN metastasis who received external beam radiation therapy (45 Gy), followed by a 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy boost (5.4-9 Gy) and tandem-and-ovoid high-dose-rate brachytherapy (16-30 Gy) were retrospectively enrolled in this study. SBRT plans were generated using 21 Gy, 24 Gy, or 30 Gy as a replacement for 3-dimensional conformal radiation therapy boost. The 2 Gy-per-fraction equivalent dose maps were made using an α/β value of 10 for PET positive LNs and 3 for organs at risk (OARs). TCP values were calculated using a logistic TCP model, where 2 input parameters (D Thirty percent of 10 patients receiving conventional boost experienced recurrence. The TCP of the SBRT schemes was 88% ± 7% (97% ± 2%; 21 Gy), 96% ± 1% (99% ± 0%; 24 Gy), and 99% ± 1% (100% ± 0%; 30 Gy), and the conventional LN-boost TCP value was 25% ± 11% (58% ± 15%) when TCP input parameters were based on published clinical outcome data for LN SBRT treatments (institutional outcome data). The tumor coverage doses (D90) of the SBRT boost plans were on average 32.34 Gy An SBRT boost dose of 30 Gy can be delivered without compromising QUANTEC OAR limits. The use of SBRT increases TCP values, regardless of the input parameters.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30415074
pii: S1879-8500(18)30313-8
doi: 10.1016/j.prro.2018.10.012
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
e156-e163Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Inc.