Variability in skilled nursing facility screening and admission processes: Implications for value-based purchasing.
Journal
Health care management review
ISSN: 1550-5030
Titre abrégé: Health Care Manage Rev
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7611530
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Historique:
pubmed:
13
11
2018
medline:
29
9
2021
entrez:
13
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Hospitalized older adults are increasingly admitted to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for posthospital care. However, little is known about how SNFs screen and evaluate potential new admissions. In an era of increasing emphasis on postacute care outcomes, these processes may represent an important target for interventions to improve the value of SNF care. The aim of this study was to understand (a) how SNF clinicians evaluate hospitalized older adults and make decisions to admit patients to an SNF and (b) the limitations and benefits of current practices in the context of value-based payment reforms. We used semistructured interviews to understand the perspective of 18 clinicians at three unique SNFs-including physicians, nurses, therapists, and liaisons. All transcripts were analyzed using a general inductive theme-based approach. We found that the screening and admission processes varied by SNF and that variability was influenced by three key external pressures: (a) inconsistent and inadequate transfer of medical documentation, (b) lack of understanding among hospital staff of SNF processes and capabilities, and (c) hospital payment models that encouraged hospitals to discharge patients rapidly. Responses to these pressures varied across SNFs. For example, screening and evaluation processes to respond to these pressures included gaining access to electronic medical records, providing inpatient physician consultations prior to SNF acceptance, and turning away more complex patients for those perceived to be more straightforward rehabilitation patients. We found facility behavior was driven by internal and external factors with implications for equitable access to care in the era of value-based purchasing. SNFs can most effectively respond to these pressures by increasing their agency within hospital-SNF relationships and prioritizing more careful patient screening to match patient needs and facility capabilities.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Hospitalized older adults are increasingly admitted to skilled nursing facilities (SNFs) for posthospital care. However, little is known about how SNFs screen and evaluate potential new admissions. In an era of increasing emphasis on postacute care outcomes, these processes may represent an important target for interventions to improve the value of SNF care.
PURPOSE
The aim of this study was to understand (a) how SNF clinicians evaluate hospitalized older adults and make decisions to admit patients to an SNF and (b) the limitations and benefits of current practices in the context of value-based payment reforms.
METHODS
We used semistructured interviews to understand the perspective of 18 clinicians at three unique SNFs-including physicians, nurses, therapists, and liaisons. All transcripts were analyzed using a general inductive theme-based approach.
RESULTS
We found that the screening and admission processes varied by SNF and that variability was influenced by three key external pressures: (a) inconsistent and inadequate transfer of medical documentation, (b) lack of understanding among hospital staff of SNF processes and capabilities, and (c) hospital payment models that encouraged hospitals to discharge patients rapidly. Responses to these pressures varied across SNFs. For example, screening and evaluation processes to respond to these pressures included gaining access to electronic medical records, providing inpatient physician consultations prior to SNF acceptance, and turning away more complex patients for those perceived to be more straightforward rehabilitation patients.
CONCLUSIONS
We found facility behavior was driven by internal and external factors with implications for equitable access to care in the era of value-based purchasing.
PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS
SNFs can most effectively respond to these pressures by increasing their agency within hospital-SNF relationships and prioritizing more careful patient screening to match patient needs and facility capabilities.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30418292
doi: 10.1097/HMR.0000000000000225
pmc: PMC6506403
mid: NIHMS1505893
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S.
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
353-363Subventions
Organisme : HSRD VA
ID : IK2 HX001796
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : R03 AG050885
Pays : United States
Références
J Gerontol Nurs. 2017 Dec 1;43(12):11-20
pubmed: 29177522
JAMA. 2010 Jun 9;303(22):2253-9
pubmed: 20530778
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2017 Nov;65(11):2466-2472
pubmed: 28682456
Health Aff (Millwood). 2017 Jan 1;36(1):67-73
pubmed: 28069848
Health Aff (Millwood). 2011 Sep;30(9):1708-17
pubmed: 21900662
Bull Econ Res. 2011;63(1):1-27
pubmed: 21141646
BMC Health Serv Res. 2013 Jul 30;13:289
pubmed: 23899326
Health Place. 2012 Mar;18(2):132-7
pubmed: 21873103
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Sep 1;17(9):839-45
pubmed: 27349621
J Hosp Med. 2013 Feb;8(2):102-9
pubmed: 23184714
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2004 Nov;52(11):1817-25
pubmed: 15507057
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2013 Jul;61(7):1095-102
pubmed: 23731003
Health Serv Res. 2013 Dec;48(6 Pt 1):1898-919
pubmed: 24134773
J Gen Intern Med. 2017 Jan;32(1):42-48
pubmed: 27503438
J Am Med Dir Assoc. 2016 Mar 1;17(3):249-55
pubmed: 26715357
BMC Health Serv Res. 2014 Sep 23;14:423
pubmed: 25244946
Am J Surg. 2017 May;213(5):910-914
pubmed: 28396033
J Hosp Med. 2017 Jan;12(1):46-51
pubmed: 28125831
Health Aff (Millwood). 2010 Jan-Feb;29(1):57-64
pubmed: 20048361