Factors influencing the use of opioids for breakthrough cancer pain: A secondary analysis of the IOPS-MS study.


Journal

European journal of pain (London, England)
ISSN: 1532-2149
Titre abrégé: Eur J Pain
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9801774

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Historique:
received: 20 07 2018
revised: 19 09 2018
accepted: 07 11 2018
pubmed: 14 11 2018
medline: 14 6 2019
entrez: 14 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Controversies exist about the choice and the doses of opioid medication in breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP). The aim was to assess factors influencing the use and the doses of opioids prescribed for BTcP. There was performed a secondary analysis of a national, multicentre study that involving 32 centres performed in patients having BTcP. Diagnosis of BTcP was based on a definite algorithm. Patients using opioids for background pain and for BTcP were selected. Average pain intensity and opioids used for background pain and BTcP, and adverse effects were assessed, as well as patient's satisfaction and the grade of mucositis. The analysis was performed in 2,771 patients. Opioid doses given for BTcP were significantly associated with those given for background pain. No relationship between adverse effects and the use and the doses of opioids used for BTcP was found. Drugs and doses were not correlated to the grade of oral mucositis. Nasal fentanyl preparations provided the fastest meaningful pain relief in comparison with other fentanyl transmucosal preparations or morphine preparations (P = 0.000). The majority of patients were satisfied with opioid medications given for BTcP. Only 2.8% of patients reported adverse effects related to opioid medication used for BTcP. Age and gender were independently associated with dosages of some fentanyl products. Opioids for BTcP were effective and safe in a large sample of cancer patients with different stages of disease. Doses of opioids proportional to doses used for background pain seem to guarantee both efficacy and safety. The use of opioids for breakthough cancer pain was effective and safe in a large sample of advanced cancer patients recruited in different stages of disease and settings. Doses of opioids proportional to opioid doses used for background analgesia, seem to guarantee both effectiveness and safety.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Controversies exist about the choice and the doses of opioid medication in breakthrough cancer pain (BTcP).
METHODS METHODS
The aim was to assess factors influencing the use and the doses of opioids prescribed for BTcP. There was performed a secondary analysis of a national, multicentre study that involving 32 centres performed in patients having BTcP. Diagnosis of BTcP was based on a definite algorithm. Patients using opioids for background pain and for BTcP were selected. Average pain intensity and opioids used for background pain and BTcP, and adverse effects were assessed, as well as patient's satisfaction and the grade of mucositis.
RESULTS RESULTS
The analysis was performed in 2,771 patients. Opioid doses given for BTcP were significantly associated with those given for background pain. No relationship between adverse effects and the use and the doses of opioids used for BTcP was found. Drugs and doses were not correlated to the grade of oral mucositis. Nasal fentanyl preparations provided the fastest meaningful pain relief in comparison with other fentanyl transmucosal preparations or morphine preparations (P = 0.000). The majority of patients were satisfied with opioid medications given for BTcP. Only 2.8% of patients reported adverse effects related to opioid medication used for BTcP. Age and gender were independently associated with dosages of some fentanyl products.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Opioids for BTcP were effective and safe in a large sample of cancer patients with different stages of disease. Doses of opioids proportional to doses used for background pain seem to guarantee both efficacy and safety.
SIGNIFICANCE CONCLUSIONS
The use of opioids for breakthough cancer pain was effective and safe in a large sample of advanced cancer patients recruited in different stages of disease and settings. Doses of opioids proportional to opioid doses used for background analgesia, seem to guarantee both effectiveness and safety.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30421474
doi: 10.1002/ejp.1339
doi:

Substances chimiques

Analgesics, Opioid 0
Morphine 76I7G6D29C
Fentanyl UF599785JZ

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

719-726

Informations de copyright

© 2018 European Pain Federation - EFIC®.

Auteurs

Sebastiano Mercadante (S)

Main Regional Center for Pain Relief and Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy.
Department of Supportive/Palliative Care, MD Anderson, Houston, Texas.

Claudio Adile (C)

Main Regional Center for Pain Relief and Supportive/Palliative Care, La Maddalena Cancer Center, Palermo, Italy.

Francesco Masedu (F)

Department of Biotechnological and Applied Clinical Sciences, Section of Clinical Epidemiology and Environmental Medicine, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Paolo Marchetti (P)

Medical Oncology, Sapienza University of Rome and IDI-IRCCS Rome, Rome, Italy.

Andrea Costanzi (A)

Medical Oncology, Sapienza University of Rome and IDI-IRCCS Rome, Rome, Italy.

Federica Aielli (F)

Department of Applied Clinical Sciences and Biotechnology, University of L'Aquila, L'Aquila, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH