Withdrawal of pharmacological treatment for heart failure in patients with recovered dilated cardiomyopathy (TRED-HF): an open-label, pilot, randomised trial.
Biomarkers
/ blood
Cardiomyopathy, Dilated
/ complications
Cardiovascular Agents
/ administration & dosage
Drug Administration Schedule
Female
Heart Failure
/ drug therapy
Humans
Kaplan-Meier Estimate
Male
Middle Aged
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
/ blood
Peptide Fragments
/ blood
Pilot Projects
Prognosis
Recurrence
Remission Induction
Stroke Volume
/ drug effects
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left
/ drug effects
Withholding Treatment
Journal
Lancet (London, England)
ISSN: 1474-547X
Titre abrégé: Lancet
Pays: England
ID NLM: 2985213R
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 01 2019
05 01 2019
Historique:
received:
13
09
2018
revised:
27
09
2018
accepted:
03
10
2018
pubmed:
16
11
2018
medline:
15
1
2019
entrez:
16
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy whose symptoms and cardiac function have recovered often ask whether their medications can be stopped. The safety of withdrawing treatment in this situation is unknown. We did an open-label, pilot, randomised trial to examine the effect of phased withdrawal of heart failure medications in patients with previous dilated cardiomyopathy who were now asymptomatic, whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had improved from less than 40% to 50% or greater, whose left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) had normalised, and who had an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) concentration less than 250 ng/L. Patients were recruited from a network of hospitals in the UK, assessed at one centre (Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK), and randomly assigned (1:1) to phased withdrawal or continuation of treatment. After 6 months, patients in the continued treatment group had treatment withdrawn by the same method. The primary endpoint was a relapse of dilated cardiomyopathy within 6 months, defined by a reduction in LVEF of more than 10% and to less than 50%, an increase in LVEDV by more than 10% and to higher than the normal range, a two-fold rise in NT-pro-BNP concentration and to more than 400 ng/L, or clinical evidence of heart failure, at which point treatments were re-established. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02859311. Between April 21, 2016, and Aug 22, 2017, 51 patients were enrolled. 25 were randomly assigned to the treatment withdrawal group and 26 to continue treatment. Over the first 6 months, 11 (44%) patients randomly assigned to treatment withdrawal met the primary endpoint of relapse compared with none of those assigned to continue treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 45·7% [95% CI 28·5-67·2]; p=0·0001). After 6 months, 25 (96%) of 26 patients assigned initially to continue treatment attempted its withdrawal. During the following 6 months, nine patients met the primary endpoint of relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 36·0% [95% CI 20·6-57·8]). No deaths were reported in either group and three serious adverse events were reported in the treatment withdrawal group: hospital admissions for non-cardiac chest pain, sepsis, and an elective procedure. Many patients deemed to have recovered from dilated cardiomyopathy will relapse following treatment withdrawal. Until robust predictors of relapse are defined, treatment should continue indefinitely. British Heart Foundation, Alexander Jansons Foundation, Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and Rosetrees Trust.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Patients with dilated cardiomyopathy whose symptoms and cardiac function have recovered often ask whether their medications can be stopped. The safety of withdrawing treatment in this situation is unknown.
METHODS
We did an open-label, pilot, randomised trial to examine the effect of phased withdrawal of heart failure medications in patients with previous dilated cardiomyopathy who were now asymptomatic, whose left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) had improved from less than 40% to 50% or greater, whose left ventricular end-diastolic volume (LVEDV) had normalised, and who had an N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-pro-BNP) concentration less than 250 ng/L. Patients were recruited from a network of hospitals in the UK, assessed at one centre (Royal Brompton and Harefield NHS Foundation Trust, London, UK), and randomly assigned (1:1) to phased withdrawal or continuation of treatment. After 6 months, patients in the continued treatment group had treatment withdrawn by the same method. The primary endpoint was a relapse of dilated cardiomyopathy within 6 months, defined by a reduction in LVEF of more than 10% and to less than 50%, an increase in LVEDV by more than 10% and to higher than the normal range, a two-fold rise in NT-pro-BNP concentration and to more than 400 ng/L, or clinical evidence of heart failure, at which point treatments were re-established. The primary analysis was by intention to treat. This trial is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number NCT02859311.
FINDINGS
Between April 21, 2016, and Aug 22, 2017, 51 patients were enrolled. 25 were randomly assigned to the treatment withdrawal group and 26 to continue treatment. Over the first 6 months, 11 (44%) patients randomly assigned to treatment withdrawal met the primary endpoint of relapse compared with none of those assigned to continue treatment (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 45·7% [95% CI 28·5-67·2]; p=0·0001). After 6 months, 25 (96%) of 26 patients assigned initially to continue treatment attempted its withdrawal. During the following 6 months, nine patients met the primary endpoint of relapse (Kaplan-Meier estimate of event rate 36·0% [95% CI 20·6-57·8]). No deaths were reported in either group and three serious adverse events were reported in the treatment withdrawal group: hospital admissions for non-cardiac chest pain, sepsis, and an elective procedure.
INTERPRETATION
Many patients deemed to have recovered from dilated cardiomyopathy will relapse following treatment withdrawal. Until robust predictors of relapse are defined, treatment should continue indefinitely.
FUNDING
British Heart Foundation, Alexander Jansons Foundation, Royal Brompton Hospital and Imperial College London, Imperial College Biomedical Research Centre, Wellcome Trust, and Rosetrees Trust.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30429050
pii: S0140-6736(18)32484-X
doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)32484-X
pmc: PMC6319251
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Biomarkers
0
Cardiovascular Agents
0
Peptide Fragments
0
pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76)
0
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain
114471-18-0
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02859311']
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Randomized Controlled Trial
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
61-73Subventions
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MC_UP_1102/20
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Medical Research Council
ID : MR/M003191/1
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Wellcome Trust
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : British Heart Foundation
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2019 The Author(s). Published by Elsevier Ltd. This is an Open Access article under the CC BY 4.0 license. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.
Références
Can J Cardiol. 2009 May;25(5):e147-50
pubmed: 19417864
Genet Med. 2017 Oct;19(10):1151-1158
pubmed: 28518168
Circulation. 1996 Mar 1;93(5):841-2
pubmed: 8598070
Eur Heart J. 2016 Jul 14;37(27):2129-2200
pubmed: 27206819
Genet Med. 2017 Feb;19(2):192-203
pubmed: 27532257
Sci Transl Med. 2015 Jan 14;7(270):270ra6
pubmed: 25589632
J Am Heart Assoc. 2015 Jan 13;4(1):e001504
pubmed: 25587018
JAMA Cardiol. 2016 May 1;1(2):234-5
pubmed: 27437901
Eur Heart J. 2018 Jan 1;39(1):26-35
pubmed: 29040525
Am J Cardiol. 1994 Mar 15;73(8):591-6
pubmed: 8147307
Lancet. 2010 Sep 11;376(9744):886-94
pubmed: 20801495
Am Heart J. 1999 Sep;138(3 Pt 1):456-9
pubmed: 10467195
Am Heart J. 2006 Sep;152(3):509-13
pubmed: 16923422
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2006;8(3):417-26
pubmed: 16755827
Circulation. 2014 Jun 10;129(23):2380-7
pubmed: 24799515
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2017 Oct 31;70(18):2264-2274
pubmed: 29073955
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Mar 29;57(13):1468-76
pubmed: 21435516
N Engl J Med. 2016 Jan 21;374(3):233-41
pubmed: 26735901
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2000;2(4):271-8
pubmed: 11545126
Circulation. 1989 Sep;80(3):551-63
pubmed: 2548768
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1993 Nov 15;22(6):1557-63
pubmed: 8227822
Genet Med. 2015 May;17(5):405-24
pubmed: 25741868
J Card Fail. 2011 Jul;17(7):527-32
pubmed: 21703523
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Dec 18;60(24):2465-72
pubmed: 23158527
Circ Heart Fail. 2016 Jul;9(7):
pubmed: 27413037
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2018 May 22;71(20):2293-2302
pubmed: 29773157
N Engl J Med. 2000 Apr 13;342(15):1077-84
pubmed: 10760308
Br Heart J. 1980 Aug;44(2):134-42
pubmed: 6107091