Robotic distal pancreatectomy with selective closure of pancreatic duct: surgical outcomes.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Crown-Rump Length
Female
Humans
Length of Stay
Male
Middle Aged
Operative Time
Pancreas
/ surgery
Pancreatectomy
/ methods
Pancreatic Ducts
/ surgery
Pancreatic Fistula
/ epidemiology
Pancreatic Neoplasms
/ surgery
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Robotic Surgical Procedures
/ methods
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Suture Techniques
Treatment Outcome
Distal pancreatectomy
Robotic surgery
Surgical outcomes
Wirsung closure
Journal
Updates in surgery
ISSN: 2038-3312
Titre abrégé: Updates Surg
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 101539818
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
12
02
2018
accepted:
09
11
2018
pubmed:
16
11
2018
medline:
30
7
2019
entrez:
16
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Pancreatic fistula is the main post-operative complication of distal pancreatectomy associated with other further complications, such as intra-abdominal abscesses, wound infection, sepsis, electrolyte imbalance, malabsorption and hemorrhage. Surgeons have tried various techniques to close the stump of the remaining pancreas, but the controversy regarding the impact of stapler closure and suture closure of the pancreatic stump is far from resolved. In this study, we reported our technique and results of robotic assisted distal pancreatectomy with ultrasound identification and consequent selective closure of pancreatic duct. Twenty-one patients underwent consecutive robotic-assisted distal pancreatectomy were included in our study. We describe our technique and analyzed the operative and peri-operative data including mean operative time, intra-operative bleeding, blood transfusions necessity, conversion rate, mortality and morbidity rate, pancreatic fistula rate and grade, time of refeeding and canalization, length of hospital stay and readmission. Median operative time was 260 min. No conversion occurred. Estimated blood loss was 100 mL (range 50-200). No blood transfusions were performed. Mortality rate was 0%. One (5%) patient had a major complication, while 9 (43%) patients had minor complications (grade I). Three (14%) patients developed pancreatic fistula (grade B), while two (10%) patients had a biochemical leak. No late pancreatic fistula and re-operation occurred. The refeeding was started at second day (range 1^-6^) and the median canalization time was 4 days (range 2-7). The median hospital stay was 6 days (range 3-25) with a readmission rate of 0%. Robotic distal pancreatectomy can be considered safe and feasible. Our technique is easily reproducible, with good surgical results.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30430370
doi: 10.1007/s13304-018-0605-6
pii: 10.1007/s13304-018-0605-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
145-150Références
Surgery. 1979 Feb;85(2):166-70
pubmed: 369013
Br J Surg. 2005 May;92(5):539-46
pubmed: 15852419
Surgery. 2017 Mar;161(3):584-591
pubmed: 28040257
Am J Surg. 2015 Mar;209(3):557-63
pubmed: 25596756
Lancet. 2011 Apr 30;377(9776):1514-22
pubmed: 21529927
Ann Surg. 2007 Apr;245(4):573-82
pubmed: 17414606
World J Surg. 1998 May;22(5):494-8
pubmed: 9564295
Curr Probl Cancer. 2002 Jul-Aug;26(4):176-275
pubmed: 12399802
ANZ J Surg. 2003 Nov;73(11):922-5
pubmed: 14616571
J Trauma. 1991 Dec;31(12):1600-6
pubmed: 1749029
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2014 Jan;21(1):72-7
pubmed: 23804436
Am Surg. 2009 Aug;75(8):671-9; discussion 679-80
pubmed: 19725289
Ann Surg. 2006 Dec;244(6):931-7; discussion 937-9
pubmed: 17122618
Minerva Chir. 2015 Aug;70(4):241-7
pubmed: 25916194
J Am Coll Surg. 2010 Oct;211(4):503-9
pubmed: 20868976
Pancreatology. 2017 May - Jun;17(3):497-503
pubmed: 28411019
Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13
pubmed: 15273542