Differential use of medical versus surgical androgen deprivation therapy for patients with metastatic prostate cancer.


Journal

Cancer
ISSN: 1097-0142
Titre abrégé: Cancer
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0374236

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
01 02 2019
Historique:
received: 16 07 2018
revised: 27 08 2018
accepted: 01 10 2018
pubmed: 18 11 2018
medline: 27 11 2019
entrez: 17 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Surgical and medical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) strategies are comparable in their ability to suppress serum testosterone levels as treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer but differ with regard to cost and impact on quality of life. Medical ADT is associated with better long-term quality of life due to the flexibility of possible therapy interruption but comes with a higher cumulative cost. In the current study, the authors examined whether surgical ADT (ie, bilateral orchiectomy) was used differentially by race/ethnicity and other social factors. The authors identified patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis through the California Cancer Registry. The association between race/ethnicity and receipt of surgical ADT was modeled using multivariable Firth logistic regression adjusting for age, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, clinical tumor and lymph node classification, neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), insurance, marital status, comorbidities, initial treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy), location of care, rural/urban area of residence, and year of diagnosis. The authors examined a total of 10,675 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 11.4% of whom were non-Hispanic black, 8.4% of whom were Asian/Pacific Islander, 18.5% of whom were Hispanic/Latino, and 60.5% of whom were non-Hispanic white. In the multivariable model, patients found to be more likely to receive surgical ADT were Hispanic/Latino (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.01-1.72), were from a low neighborhood SES (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.34-2.89) or rural area (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.92), and had Medicaid/public insurance (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.58-3.10). Patients with military/Veterans Affairs insurance were significantly less likely to receive surgical ADT compared with patients with private insurance (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.88). Race/ethnicity, neighborhood SES, and insurance status appear to be significantly associated with receipt of surgical ADT. Future research will need to characterize other differences in initial treatments among men with advanced prostate cancer based on race/ethnicity and aim to better understand what factors drive the association between surgical ADT among men of Hispanic origin or those from areas with low neighborhood SES.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Surgical and medical androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) strategies are comparable in their ability to suppress serum testosterone levels as treatment in patients with metastatic prostate cancer but differ with regard to cost and impact on quality of life. Medical ADT is associated with better long-term quality of life due to the flexibility of possible therapy interruption but comes with a higher cumulative cost. In the current study, the authors examined whether surgical ADT (ie, bilateral orchiectomy) was used differentially by race/ethnicity and other social factors.
METHODS
The authors identified patients with metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis through the California Cancer Registry. The association between race/ethnicity and receipt of surgical ADT was modeled using multivariable Firth logistic regression adjusting for age, Gleason score, prostate-specific antigen level, clinical tumor and lymph node classification, neighborhood socioeconomic status (SES), insurance, marital status, comorbidities, initial treatment (radiotherapy, chemotherapy), location of care, rural/urban area of residence, and year of diagnosis.
RESULTS
The authors examined a total of 10,675 patients with metastatic prostate cancer, 11.4% of whom were non-Hispanic black, 8.4% of whom were Asian/Pacific Islander, 18.5% of whom were Hispanic/Latino, and 60.5% of whom were non-Hispanic white. In the multivariable model, patients found to be more likely to receive surgical ADT were Hispanic/Latino (odds ratio [OR], 1.32; 95% confidence interval [95% CI], 1.01-1.72), were from a low neighborhood SES (OR, 1.96; 95% CI, 1.34-2.89) or rural area (OR, 1.49; 95% CI, 1.15-1.92), and had Medicaid/public insurance (OR, 2.21; 95% CI, 1.58-3.10). Patients with military/Veterans Affairs insurance were significantly less likely to receive surgical ADT compared with patients with private insurance (OR, 0.34; 95% CI, 0.13-0.88).
CONCLUSIONS
Race/ethnicity, neighborhood SES, and insurance status appear to be significantly associated with receipt of surgical ADT. Future research will need to characterize other differences in initial treatments among men with advanced prostate cancer based on race/ethnicity and aim to better understand what factors drive the association between surgical ADT among men of Hispanic origin or those from areas with low neighborhood SES.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30444526
doi: 10.1002/cncr.31826
pmc: PMC6340740
mid: NIHMS992217
doi:

Substances chimiques

Androgen Antagonists 0
Antineoplastic Agents, Hormonal 0

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, U.S. Gov't, Non-P.H.S. Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S.

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

453-462

Subventions

Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN261201000140C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN261201000035C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AG000212
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN261201000035I
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : HHSN261201000034C
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCCDPHP CDC HHS
ID : U58 DP003862
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© 2018 American Cancer Society.

Références

Curr Opin Support Palliat Care. 2013 Sep;7(3):258-64
pubmed: 23912384
Anticancer Res. 2001 Jan-Feb;21(1B):781-8
pubmed: 11299844
Stat Med. 2002 Aug 30;21(16):2409-19
pubmed: 12210625
Med Care. 2016 Sep;54(9):e55-64
pubmed: 24638121
JAMA Oncol. 2017 May 1;3(5):705-707
pubmed: 28033446
Cancer. 2008 Feb 15;112(4):909-18
pubmed: 18189295
J Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;36(1):25-33
pubmed: 29035642
BMC Health Serv Res. 2007 Mar 09;7:40
pubmed: 17349050
Cancer Cell. 2017 Sep 11;32(3):392
pubmed: 28898699
J Clin Oncol. 2005 Oct 1;23(28):7074-80
pubmed: 16192590
Scand J Urol Nephrol. 1995 Dec;29(4):497-500
pubmed: 8719369
Oncotarget. 2017 Jul 6;8(41):69709-69721
pubmed: 29050235
Cancer Causes Control. 2001 Oct;12(8):703-11
pubmed: 11562110
N Engl J Med. 2017 Jul 27;377(4):352-360
pubmed: 28578607
Urol Oncol. 2015 Jan;33(1):18.e7-18.e13
pubmed: 25306287
Cancer Epidemiol. 2018 Apr;53:1-11
pubmed: 29328959
Mayo Clin Proc. 2001 Dec;76(12):1199-203
pubmed: 11761500
Urology. 2000 Dec 20;56(6):1021-4
pubmed: 11113751
Clin Epidemiol. 2017 Nov 20;9:601-609
pubmed: 29200890
J Pain Symptom Manage. 2010 May;39(5):872-81
pubmed: 20471547
Urology. 2017 Jan;99:76-83
pubmed: 27667157
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2011 Jun;29(6):404-8
pubmed: 21829963
Oncologist. 2018 Oct;23(10):1242-1249
pubmed: 29700209
Source Code Biol Med. 2008 Dec 16;3:17
pubmed: 19087314
JAMA. 2005 Jul 13;294(2):238-44
pubmed: 16014598
Cancer Med. 2013 Jun;2(3):403-11
pubmed: 23930216
N Engl J Med. 2013 Apr 4;368(14):1314-25
pubmed: 23550669
Nat Rev Cancer. 2002 May;2(5):389-96
pubmed: 12044015
J Urol. 2017 Dec;198(6):1230-1240
pubmed: 28552708
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2009 Jul 15;101(14):984-92
pubmed: 19584328
Am J Mens Health. 2013 Jul;7(4):306-16
pubmed: 23339130
Urol Oncol. 2014 Nov;32(8):1285-91
pubmed: 24846344
Ann Surg. 1942 Jun;115(6):1192-200
pubmed: 17858048
JAMA Oncol. 2018 Mar 1;4(3):317-323
pubmed: 29192307

Auteurs

Hala T Borno (HT)

Division of Hematology and Oncology, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Daphne Y Lichtensztajn (DY)

Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, California.

Scarlett L Gomez (SL)

Cancer Prevention Institute of California, Fremont, California.
Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Nynikka R Palmer (NR)

Division of General Internal Medicine, Department of Medicine, University of California at San Francisco, San Francisco, California.

Charles J Ryan (CJ)

Division of Hematology, Oncology and Transplantation, Department of Medicine, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, Minnesota.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH