Accuracy of in-house alcohol-dissolved wheat extract for diagnosing IgE-mediated wheat allergy.


Journal

Asian Pacific journal of allergy and immunology
ISSN: 0125-877X
Titre abrégé: Asian Pac J Allergy Immunol
Pays: Thailand
ID NLM: 8402034

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Jun 2020
Historique:
pubmed: 19 11 2018
medline: 27 1 2021
entrez: 19 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The standard method for diagnosing immediate wheat allergy is oral food challenge test (OFC). However, OFC can provoke anaphylaxis during the challenge process. Skin prick test (SPT) using commercial wheat extract yielded unsatisfactory result for diagnosis of wheat allergy. As a result, an in-house, alcohol-dissolved (Coca-10% EtOH) wheat extract was developed to improve accuracy of the SPT. To determine the accuracy of in-house, alcohol-dissolved wheat extract in children with immediate wheat allergy. This prospective cross-sectional study included children with history of immediate reaction after wheat ingestion. SPTs with commercial and in-house Coca-10% EtOH wheat extract were performed and wheat and omega-5 (ω-5) gliadin specific IgE (sIgE) were measured. Patients with no history of recent anaphylaxis after wheat ingestion underwent OFC with 31 grams of wheat flour. Thirty children were recruited. Thirteen of those had history of anaphylaxis after wheat ingestion. Eleven of the remaining 17 children (64.7%) had a positive result for wheat challenge test. Wheal size of 3 mm for both in-house and commercial wheat extract yielded the best accuracy for the test. Using these cutoff parameters, in-house Coca-10% EtOH wheat extract yielded 91.7% sensitivity, 66.7% specificity, and 86.7% accuracy. Comparatively, the commercial extract yielded 70.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 76.6% accuracy. SPT using in-house Coca-10% EtOH wheat extract yielded better accuracy than commercial extract for diagnosing immediate type wheat allergy in children.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
The standard method for diagnosing immediate wheat allergy is oral food challenge test (OFC). However, OFC can provoke anaphylaxis during the challenge process. Skin prick test (SPT) using commercial wheat extract yielded unsatisfactory result for diagnosis of wheat allergy. As a result, an in-house, alcohol-dissolved (Coca-10% EtOH) wheat extract was developed to improve accuracy of the SPT.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To determine the accuracy of in-house, alcohol-dissolved wheat extract in children with immediate wheat allergy.
METHODS METHODS
This prospective cross-sectional study included children with history of immediate reaction after wheat ingestion. SPTs with commercial and in-house Coca-10% EtOH wheat extract were performed and wheat and omega-5 (ω-5) gliadin specific IgE (sIgE) were measured. Patients with no history of recent anaphylaxis after wheat ingestion underwent OFC with 31 grams of wheat flour.
RESULTS RESULTS
Thirty children were recruited. Thirteen of those had history of anaphylaxis after wheat ingestion. Eleven of the remaining 17 children (64.7%) had a positive result for wheat challenge test. Wheal size of 3 mm for both in-house and commercial wheat extract yielded the best accuracy for the test. Using these cutoff parameters, in-house Coca-10% EtOH wheat extract yielded 91.7% sensitivity, 66.7% specificity, and 86.7% accuracy. Comparatively, the commercial extract yielded 70.8% sensitivity, 100% specificity, and 76.6% accuracy.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
SPT using in-house Coca-10% EtOH wheat extract yielded better accuracy than commercial extract for diagnosing immediate type wheat allergy in children.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30447656
doi: 10.12932/AP-140218-0265
doi:

Substances chimiques

Alcohols 0
Allergens 0
Plant Extracts 0
Plant Proteins 0
Immunoglobulin E 37341-29-0
Gliadin 9007-90-3

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

102-107

Auteurs

Punchama Pacharn (P)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nunthana Siripipattanamongkol (N)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nittida Pannakapitak (N)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Nualanong Visitsunthorn (N)

Division of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Orathai Jirapongsananuruk (O)

ivision of Allergy and Immunology, Department of Pediatrics, Faculty of Medicine Siriraj Hospital, Mahidol University, Bangkok, Thailand.

Surapon Piboonpocanun (S)

Institute of Molecular Biosciences, Mahidol University, Salaya Campus, Nakhonpathom, Thailand.

Pakit Vichyanond (P)

Samitivej Allergy Institute, Samitivej Thonburi Hospital, Thonburi, Bangkok, Thailand.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH