Surgery vs Radiotherapy in the Management of Biopsy Gleason Score 9-10 Prostate Cancer and the Risk of Mortality.
Aged
Androgen Antagonists
/ therapeutic use
Biopsy
Brachytherapy
/ adverse effects
Chemotherapy, Adjuvant
Germany
Humans
Illinois
Lymph Node Excision
Male
Middle Aged
Neoplasm Grading
Prostatectomy
/ adverse effects
Prostatic Neoplasms
/ mortality
Radiotherapy, Adjuvant
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Journal
JAMA oncology
ISSN: 2374-2445
Titre abrégé: JAMA Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101652861
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
20
11
2018
medline:
18
12
2019
entrez:
20
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
It is unknown how treatment with radical prostatectomy (RP) and adjuvant external beam radiotherapy (EBRT), androgen deprivation therapy (ADT), or both (termed MaxRP) compares with treatment with EBRT, brachytherapy, and ADT (termed MaxRT). To investigate whether treatment of Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer with MaxRP vs MaxRT was associated with prostate cancer-specific mortality (PCSM) and all-cause mortality (ACM) risk. The study cohort comprised 639 men with clinical T1-4,N0M0 biopsy Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer. Between February 6, 1992, and April 26, 2013, a total of 80 men were consecutively treated with MaxRT at the Chicago Prostate Cancer Center, and 559 men were consecutively treated with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection at the Martini-Klinik Prostate Cancer Center. Follow-up started on the day of prostate EBRT or RP and concluded on October 27, 2017. Of the 559 men managed with RP and pelvic lymph node dissection, 88 (15.7%) received adjuvant EBRT, 49 (8.8%) received ADT, and 50 (8.9%) received both. Treatment propensity score-adjusted risk of PCSM and ACM and the likelihood of equivalence of these risks between treatments using a plausibility index. The cohort included 639 men, with a mean (SD) age of 65.83 (6.52) years. After median follow-ups of 5.51 years (interquartile range, 2.19-6.95 years) among 80 men treated with MaxRT and 4.78 years (interquartile range, 4.01-6.05 years) among 559 men treated with RP-containing treatments, 161 men had died, 106 (65.8%) from prostate cancer. There was no significant difference in the risk of PCSM (adjusted hazard ratio, 1.33; 95% CI, 0.49-3.64; P = .58) and ACM (adjusted hazard ratio, 0.80; 95% CI, 0.36-1.81; P = .60) when comparing men who underwent MaxRP vs MaxRT, with plausibility indexes for equivalence of 76.75% for the end point of the risk of PCSM and 77.97% for the end point of the risk of ACM. Plausibility indexes for all other treatment comparisons were less than 63%. Results of this study suggest that it is plausible that treatment with MaxRP or MaxRT for men with biopsy Gleason score 9-10 prostate cancer can lead to equivalent risk of PCSM and ACM.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30452521
pii: 2713856
doi: 10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.4836
pmc: PMC6439553
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgen Antagonists
0
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
213-220Références
J Urol. 2009 Mar;181(3):956-62
pubmed: 19167731
Lancet Oncol. 2006 Jun;7(6):472-9
pubmed: 16750497
J Clin Oncol. 2009 Jun 20;27(18):2924-30
pubmed: 19433689
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2006 Jul 15;65(4):965-74
pubmed: 16798415
Eur Urol. 2017 May;71(5):760-763
pubmed: 27939073
Lancet Oncol. 2016 Jun;17(6):747-756
pubmed: 27160475
N Engl J Med. 2016 Oct 13;375(15):1415-1424
pubmed: 27626136
Stat Med. 1995 Aug 30;14(16):1731-44
pubmed: 7481206
Urology. 2010 Sep;76(3):715-21
pubmed: 20350749
JAMA. 2004 May 26;291(20):2441-7
pubmed: 15161894
Stat Med. 1998 Oct 15;17(19):2265-81
pubmed: 9802183
Lancet. 2012 Dec 8;380(9858):2018-27
pubmed: 23084481
JAMA. 2018 Mar 6;319(9):896-905
pubmed: 29509865
N Engl J Med. 2017 Feb 2;376(5):417-428
pubmed: 28146658
Biometrika. 1965 Jun;52:203-23
pubmed: 14341275
J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2016 Jan;14(1):19-30
pubmed: 26733552