Monitoring and evaluation design of Malawi's Right Foods at the Right Time nutrition program.
Body Weights and Measures
Breast Feeding
Child Nutrition Disorders
/ prevention & control
Child, Preschool
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Cross-Sectional Studies
Diet
/ standards
Dietary Fats
/ administration & dosage
Dietary Supplements
Health Behavior
Health Promotion
/ economics
Humans
Hygiene
Infant
Infant Food
Longitudinal Studies
Malawi
Nutritional Status
Program Evaluation
Evaluation
Malawi
Monitoring
Nutrition
Stunting
Journal
Evaluation and program planning
ISSN: 1873-7870
Titre abrégé: Eval Program Plann
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7801727
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
04 2019
04 2019
Historique:
received:
27
02
2018
revised:
19
10
2018
accepted:
06
11
2018
pubmed:
20
11
2018
medline:
30
7
2019
entrez:
20
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Child stunting is a public health problem in Malawi. In 2014, the Government of Malawi launched the Right Foods at the Right Time (RFRT) program in Ntchisi district delivering nutrition social and behavior change communication, a small-quantity lipid-based nutrient supplement to children 6-23 months, and nutrition sensitive activities. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) systems are key aspects of successful program implementation. We describe these and the methodology for an impact evaluation that was conducted for this program. Two monitoring systems using traditional and electronic platforms were established to register and track program delivery and processes including number of eligible beneficiaries, worker performance, program participation, and to monitor input, output, and outcome indicators. The impact evaluation used comparative cross-sectional and longitudinal designs to assess impact on anthropometric and infant and young child feeding outcomes. Three cross-sectional surveys (base-, mid-, and end-line) and two longitudinal cohorts of children followed in 6-month intervals from 6 to 24 months of age, were conducted in sampled households in the program and a neighboring comparison district. Additional M&E included qualitative studies, a process evaluation, and a cost-effectiveness study. The current paper describes lessons from this program's M&E, and demonstrates how multiple implementation research activities can inform course-correction and program scale-up.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30453182
pii: S0149-7189(18)30025-9
doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2018.11.001
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dietary Fats
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Pagination
1-9Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Ltd.. All rights reserved.