Cardiovascular and mortality events in type 2 diabetes cardiovascular outcomes trials: a systematic review with trend analysis.
Cardiovascular
Mortality
Randomised trials
Systematic review
Trend
Type 2 diabetes
Journal
Acta diabetologica
ISSN: 1432-5233
Titre abrégé: Acta Diabetol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9200299
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
27
09
2018
accepted:
06
11
2018
pubmed:
21
11
2018
medline:
16
4
2019
entrez:
21
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To investigate cardiovascular disease and mortality trends in control arm participants of diabetes cardiovascular outcome trials (CVOTs). We electronically searched CVOTs published before October 2017. Data on all-cause mortality, cardiovascular mortality and events, and baseline characteristics were collected, along with study calendar years. Trends were estimated using negative binomial regressions and reported as rate ratio (RR) per 5-year intervals. 26 CVOTs, conducted from 1961 to 2015, included 86788 participants with 6543 all-cause deaths, 3265 cardiovascular deaths, and 7657 3-point major adverse cardiovascular events (3-P MACE; combined endpoint of cardiovascular death, nonfatal myocardial infarction, nonfatal stroke). In unadjusted analysis, there was an increasing trend for 3-P MACE rates over time (5-year RR 1.57; 95% CI 1.34, 1.84); a small increasing trend for cardiovascular disease mortality rates (1.13; 1.01, 1.26); and stable rates for all-cause death. Adjusting for age, sex, previous myocardial infarction, and diabetes duration, there was no evidence of trends for 3-P MACE or cardiovascular disease mortality rates, while reducing rates were observed for nonfatal myocardial infarction (5-year RR: 0.72; 0.54, 0.96), total stroke (0.76; 0.66, 0.88), and nonfatal stroke (0.60; 0.43, 0.82). In contrast to real-world data, there was no evidence of an improvement in all-cause and cardiovascular mortality in type 2 diabetes participants included in control arms of randomised clinical trials across 5 decades. Further studies should investigate whether and how dissimilarities in populations, procedures, and assessments of exposures and outcomes explain the differences between real-world setting and clinical trials.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30456728
doi: 10.1007/s00592-018-1253-5
pii: 10.1007/s00592-018-1253-5
pmc: PMC6394717
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
331-339Références
Stat Med. 2002 Jun 15;21(11):1559-73
pubmed: 12111920
Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf. 2009 Jun;18(6):497-503
pubmed: 19326365
Ann Intern Med. 2009 Aug 18;151(4):264-9, W64
pubmed: 19622511
JAMA. 2009 Oct 21;302(15):1698-700
pubmed: 19843906
Am Heart J. 2011 Jan;161(1):210-219.e1
pubmed: 21167356
N Engl J Med. 2011 Mar 03;364(9):829-841
pubmed: 21366474
BMJ. 2011 Oct 18;343:d5928
pubmed: 22008217
J Am Heart Assoc. 2012 Feb;1(1):8-15
pubmed: 23130114
BMJ. 2013 Jul 29;347:f4533
pubmed: 23900314
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2014 Oct;2(10):843-51
pubmed: 24731668
N Engl J Med. 2014 Apr 17;370(16):1514-23
pubmed: 24738668
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;15(11):1263-9
pubmed: 24970723
Diabetes Care. 2015 Feb;38(2):316-22
pubmed: 25492401
JAMA. 2015 Jul 7;314(1):52-60
pubmed: 26151266
N Engl J Med. 2015 Oct 29;373(18):1720-32
pubmed: 26510021
Diabetes Care. 2016 Jun;39(6):1018-26
pubmed: 27208325
Lancet Diabetes Endocrinol. 2016 Aug;4(8):677-685
pubmed: 27293218
Am Heart J. 2016 Dec;182:9-20
pubmed: 27914505
N Engl J Med. 2016 Dec 8;375(23):2293-2297
pubmed: 27959688
Lancet. 2017 Mar 4;389(10072):941-950
pubmed: 28271845
N Engl J Med. 2017 Apr 13;376(15):1407-1418
pubmed: 28402770
Diabetes Res Clin Pract. 2017 Jun;128:40-50
pubmed: 28437734
Diabetologia. 2017 Nov;60(11):2192-2199
pubmed: 28831539
Diabetes Care. 2018 Jan;41(1):14-31
pubmed: 29263194
Diabetologia. 2018 Jul;61(7):1592-1602
pubmed: 29717336
Diabetes Obes Metab. 2018 Sep;20(9):2169-2178
pubmed: 29740922
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis. 2018 Jul;28(7):722-726
pubmed: 29804832