Parent Report of Amplification Use in Children with Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.


Journal

Journal of the American Academy of Audiology
ISSN: 2157-3107
Titre abrégé: J Am Acad Audiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9114646

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 22 11 2018
medline: 1 7 2020
entrez: 22 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Amplification is considered to be one of the most important interventions for children with hearing loss. However, achieving consistent use of hearing technology in young children is an important problem, particularly when hearing loss is of mild degree. Little information is available about amplification use specifically for children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss when such losses are targeted and identified early because of the availability of newborn hearing screening. We examined amplification use in a contemporary cohort of early-identified children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss. As part of the Mild and Unilateral Hearing Loss in Children Study, we collected parent reports on their child's use of amplification during the preschool years. A total of 69 children (38 unilateral and 31 bilateral mild) enrolled in the study from 2010 to 2015. Children entered the study at various ages between 12 and 36 mo of age and were followed up to age 48 mo. The median age of the children at enrollment was 16.5 mo (interquartile range [IQR] = 9.5, 26.8). Hearing loss was confirmed in these children at a median age of 3.6 mo (IQR = 2.4, 5.7). Baseline characteristics related to the child and family were collected through an intake form at study enrollment. Data on amplification fitting and use were collected via parent questionnaires at each assessment interval. Information from parent questionnaires was summarized descriptively and amplification use was grouped into categories. Through logistic regression, we examined the relationship between amplification use and laterality of hearing loss, sex, and maternal education. Amplification was recommended for 59 (85.5%) children at a median age of 6.5 mo (IQR = 3.6, 21.2) and children were fitted at a median age of 10.9 mo (IQR = 6.0, 22.1). Based on parent report, hearing aid use was consistent for 39 (66.1%) of 59 children who had amplification recommended. Parent questionnaires showed very little change in use for most of the children over the study period. More children with bilateral hearing loss used their amplification consistently than those with unilateral hearing loss. After adjusting for maternal education and sex of the child, the odds for consistent use in children with mild bilateral loss was almost seven times higher (odds ratio = 6.75; 95% confidence interval = 1.84, 24.8) than for those with unilateral loss. Although 85.5% of children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss received amplification recommendations, only two-thirds achieved consistent use by age 3-4 yr based on parent report. Children with mild bilateral loss were more likely to use amplification during the preschool years than those with unilateral loss.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Amplification is considered to be one of the most important interventions for children with hearing loss. However, achieving consistent use of hearing technology in young children is an important problem, particularly when hearing loss is of mild degree. Little information is available about amplification use specifically for children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss when such losses are targeted and identified early because of the availability of newborn hearing screening.
PURPOSE
We examined amplification use in a contemporary cohort of early-identified children with mild bilateral and unilateral hearing loss.
RESEARCH DESIGN
As part of the Mild and Unilateral Hearing Loss in Children Study, we collected parent reports on their child's use of amplification during the preschool years.
STUDY SAMPLE
A total of 69 children (38 unilateral and 31 bilateral mild) enrolled in the study from 2010 to 2015. Children entered the study at various ages between 12 and 36 mo of age and were followed up to age 48 mo. The median age of the children at enrollment was 16.5 mo (interquartile range [IQR] = 9.5, 26.8). Hearing loss was confirmed in these children at a median age of 3.6 mo (IQR = 2.4, 5.7).
DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS
Baseline characteristics related to the child and family were collected through an intake form at study enrollment. Data on amplification fitting and use were collected via parent questionnaires at each assessment interval. Information from parent questionnaires was summarized descriptively and amplification use was grouped into categories. Through logistic regression, we examined the relationship between amplification use and laterality of hearing loss, sex, and maternal education.
RESULTS
Amplification was recommended for 59 (85.5%) children at a median age of 6.5 mo (IQR = 3.6, 21.2) and children were fitted at a median age of 10.9 mo (IQR = 6.0, 22.1). Based on parent report, hearing aid use was consistent for 39 (66.1%) of 59 children who had amplification recommended. Parent questionnaires showed very little change in use for most of the children over the study period. More children with bilateral hearing loss used their amplification consistently than those with unilateral hearing loss. After adjusting for maternal education and sex of the child, the odds for consistent use in children with mild bilateral loss was almost seven times higher (odds ratio = 6.75; 95% confidence interval = 1.84, 24.8) than for those with unilateral loss.
CONCLUSIONS
Although 85.5% of children with mild bilateral or unilateral hearing loss received amplification recommendations, only two-thirds achieved consistent use by age 3-4 yr based on parent report. Children with mild bilateral loss were more likely to use amplification during the preschool years than those with unilateral loss.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30461398
doi: 10.3766/jaaa.17020
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

93-102

Subventions

Organisme : CIHR
ID : 93705
Pays : Canada

Informations de copyright

American Academy of Audiology.

Auteurs

Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick (EM)

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Isabelle Gaboury (I)

Department of Family Medicine and Emergency Medicine, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke, PQ, Canada.

Andrée Durieux-Smith (A)

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Doug Coyle (D)

School of Epidemiology, Public Health and Preventive Medicine, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

JoAnne Whittingham (J)

Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Mina Salamatmanesh (M)

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.
Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario Research Institute, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Rachel Lee (R)

Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, ON, Canada.

Jessica Fitzpatrick (J)

Dalla Lana School of Public Health Sciences, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH