Anti-EGFR-resistant clones decay exponentially after progression: implications for anti-EGFR re-challenge.
Colorectal Neoplasms
/ drug therapy
Disease Progression
Drug Resistance, Neoplasm
ErbB Receptors
/ antagonists & inhibitors
Follow-Up Studies
Humans
Mutation
Neoplasm Metastasis
Neoplastic Cells, Circulating
/ pathology
Prognosis
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
/ therapeutic use
Retrospective Studies
Survival Rate
ras Proteins
/ genetics
anti-EGFR therapy
circulating tumor DNA
clonal decay
colorectal cancer
Journal
Annals of oncology : official journal of the European Society for Medical Oncology
ISSN: 1569-8041
Titre abrégé: Ann Oncol
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9007735
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
22
11
2018
medline:
5
3
2020
entrez:
22
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to acquire RAS and EGFR ectodomain mutations as mechanisms of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition (anti-EGFR). After anti-EGFR withdrawal, RAS and EGFR mutant clones lack a growth advantage relative to other clones and decay; however, the kinetics of decay remain unclear. We sought to determine the kinetics of acquired RAS/EGFR mutations after discontinuation of anti-EGFR therapy. We present the post-progression circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiles of 135 patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic CRC treated with anti-EGFR who acquired RAS and/or EGFR mutations during therapy. Our validation cohort consisted of an external dataset of 73 patients with a ctDNA profile suggestive of prior anti-EGFR exposure and serial sampling. A separate retrospective cohort of 80 patients was used to evaluate overall response rate and progression free survival during re-challenge therapies. Our analysis showed that RAS and EGFR relative mutant allele frequency decays exponentially (r2=0.93 for RAS; r2=0.94 for EGFR) with a cumulative half-life of 4.4 months. We validated our findings using an external dataset of 73 patients with a ctDNA profile suggestive of prior anti-EGFR exposure and serial sampling, confirming exponential decay with an estimated half-life of 4.3 months. A separate retrospective cohort of 80 patients showed that patients had a higher overall response rate during re-challenge therapies after increasing time intervals, as predicted by our model. These results provide scientific support for anti-EGFR re-challenge and guide the optimal timing of re-challenge initiation.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
Colorectal cancer (CRC) has been shown to acquire RAS and EGFR ectodomain mutations as mechanisms of resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) inhibition (anti-EGFR). After anti-EGFR withdrawal, RAS and EGFR mutant clones lack a growth advantage relative to other clones and decay; however, the kinetics of decay remain unclear. We sought to determine the kinetics of acquired RAS/EGFR mutations after discontinuation of anti-EGFR therapy.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
We present the post-progression circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) profiles of 135 patients with RAS/BRAF wild-type metastatic CRC treated with anti-EGFR who acquired RAS and/or EGFR mutations during therapy. Our validation cohort consisted of an external dataset of 73 patients with a ctDNA profile suggestive of prior anti-EGFR exposure and serial sampling. A separate retrospective cohort of 80 patients was used to evaluate overall response rate and progression free survival during re-challenge therapies.
RESULTS
Our analysis showed that RAS and EGFR relative mutant allele frequency decays exponentially (r2=0.93 for RAS; r2=0.94 for EGFR) with a cumulative half-life of 4.4 months. We validated our findings using an external dataset of 73 patients with a ctDNA profile suggestive of prior anti-EGFR exposure and serial sampling, confirming exponential decay with an estimated half-life of 4.3 months. A separate retrospective cohort of 80 patients showed that patients had a higher overall response rate during re-challenge therapies after increasing time intervals, as predicted by our model.
CONCLUSION
These results provide scientific support for anti-EGFR re-challenge and guide the optimal timing of re-challenge initiation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30462160
pii: S0923-7534(19)31024-5
doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdy509
pmc: PMC6657008
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Protein Kinase Inhibitors
0
EGFR protein, human
EC 2.7.10.1
ErbB Receptors
EC 2.7.10.1
ras Proteins
EC 3.6.5.2
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
243-249Subventions
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : P50 CA221707
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : R01 CA187238
Pays : United States
Organisme : NCI NIH HHS
ID : T32 CA009666
Pays : United States
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the European Society for Medical Oncology. All rights reserved. For permissions, please email: journals.permissions@oup.com.
Références
Eur J Cancer. 2009 Jan;45(2):228-47
pubmed: 19097774
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Dec 10;26(35):5705-12
pubmed: 19001320
BMC Cancer. 2012 Jul 17;12:292
pubmed: 22804917
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 May 15;23(10):2414-2422
pubmed: 27780856
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 1;26(10):1626-34
pubmed: 18316791
Cancer Discov. 2018 Feb;8(2):164-173
pubmed: 29196463
Nat Med. 2012 Jan 22;18(2):221-3
pubmed: 22270724
Nat Med. 2015 Jul;21(7):827
pubmed: 26151329
Sci Transl Med. 2014 Feb 19;6(224):224ra26
pubmed: 24553387
Nature. 2015 Oct 8;526(7572):263-7
pubmed: 26416732
Nature. 2013 Feb 14;494(7436):251-5
pubmed: 23302800
Lancet Oncol. 2017 Apr;18(4):464-472
pubmed: 28268064
Ann Oncol. 2012 Sep;23(9):2313-2318
pubmed: 22396447
Clin Cancer Res. 2017 Aug 15;23(16):4578-4591
pubmed: 28400427
Sci Transl Med. 2011 Sep 7;3(99):99ra86
pubmed: 21900593
N Engl J Med. 2008 Oct 23;359(17):1757-65
pubmed: 18946061
Nature. 2012 Jun 27;486(7404):482-3
pubmed: 22739312
BMC Cancer. 2015 Oct 16;15:713
pubmed: 26474549
Ann Oncol. 2018 Jan 1;29(1):119-126
pubmed: 28945848
Clin Cancer Res. 2015 May 1;21(9):2157-66
pubmed: 25623215
N Engl J Med. 2009 Apr 2;360(14):1408-17
pubmed: 19339720
Cancer Res. 2006 Jul 1;66(13):6503-11
pubmed: 16818621
Nat Rev Cancer. 2012 Jun 14;12(7):487-93
pubmed: 22695393
Nat Commun. 2016 Dec 08;7:13665
pubmed: 27929064
Int J Cancer. 2013 Sep 1;133(5):1259-65
pubmed: 23404247
Ann Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(4):731-736
pubmed: 25628445
N Engl J Med. 2013 Sep 12;369(11):1023-34
pubmed: 24024839
Oncotarget. 2016 Apr 12;7(15):20825-39
pubmed: 26959114