Cardiac T2 star mapping: standardized inline analysis of long and short axis at three identical 1.5 T MRI scanners.
Adult
Cross-Sectional Studies
Equipment Design
Female
Healthy Volunteers
Heart
/ diagnostic imaging
Humans
Image Interpretation, Computer-Assisted
/ methods
Iron
/ analysis
Magnetic Resonance Imaging, Cine
/ instrumentation
Male
Myocardium
/ chemistry
Observer Variation
Predictive Value of Tests
Prospective Studies
Reproducibility of Results
Software
Young Adult
Cross-sectional study
Heart
Magnetic resonance imaging
Reproducibility of results
Journal
The international journal of cardiovascular imaging
ISSN: 1875-8312
Titre abrégé: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 100969716
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
19
07
2018
accepted:
15
11
2018
pubmed:
23
11
2018
medline:
7
5
2019
entrez:
23
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
T2 star mapping can be applied for in vivo cardiac iron quantification. Current recommendations of imaging acquisition, post-processing and interpretation of normal values are based on old scanner types and in house software packages. A standardized comparison of short (SAX) and long axis (LAX) segments using commercially available software packages and modern scanners is lacking. To provide a standardized comparison of T2 star time values in SAX and LAX and to investigate intersegmental, interregional and inter-level comparison and the interscanner reproducibility. 84 cardiac MRIs in 28 healthy volunteers were performed with three structurally identical 1.5 T MRI scanners. A commercially available software package for T2 star mapping with automatic in-line motion correction was used for analysis. Regions of interest were manually placed in each of the 16 myocardial segments according to the AHA model in three SAX and three LAX. A total of 2856 ROIs were drawn and 102 segments per volunteer were analysed. Interscanner reproducibility was high (91%) and the mean myocardial T2 star time value for all evaluated segments was 34 ± 5.7 ms. No significant difference was found between all measurements in SAX (35 ± 5.5 ms) and LAX (34 ± 5.8 ms). T2 star time values varied significantly between heart segments in the same axis and in 44% between corresponding SAX and LAX segments. T2 star time values in SAX and LAX have a high interscanner reproducibility but can vary significantly between heart segments in the same axis. Comparability between corresponding SAX and LAX segments is limited. To get representative results T2 star time values should be obtained in more than one heart segment and for follow-up studies identical segments should be used to avoid a systematic bias.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30465128
doi: 10.1007/s10554-018-1503-1
pii: 10.1007/s10554-018-1503-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Iron
E1UOL152H7
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
695-702Références
Circulation. 2002 Jan 29;105(4):539-42
pubmed: 11815441
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2003;5(2):353-9
pubmed: 12765114
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2003 Nov;18(5):616-20
pubmed: 14579406
Magn Reson Med. 2004 Jul;52(1):141-6
pubmed: 15236377
Radiology. 2006 Mar;238(3):1004-12
pubmed: 16424239
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Sep;56(3):681-6
pubmed: 16888797
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2008 Sep 25;10:42
pubmed: 18817553
NMR Biomed. 2009 Aug;22(7):707-15
pubmed: 19322807
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2009 Jul;30(1):62-8
pubmed: 19557847
N Engl J Med. 2011 Jan 13;364(2):146-56
pubmed: 21226580
Circulation. 2011 Apr 12;123(14):1519-28
pubmed: 21444881
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2012 May 01;14:27
pubmed: 22548832
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):566-72
pubmed: 22744938
Circulation. 2013 Jul 16;128(3):281-308
pubmed: 23775258
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Sep 11;15:78
pubmed: 24025486
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2013 Oct 14;15:92
pubmed: 24124732
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2014 Nov;15(11):1302
pubmed: 24855218
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2014 Sep 27;16:80
pubmed: 25270330
Circulation. 2016 Aug 2;134(5):432-4
pubmed: 27482005
Heart Fail Rev. 2017 Jul;22(4):431-440
pubmed: 28497231
J Cardiovasc Magn Reson. 2017 Oct 9;19(1):75
pubmed: 28992817