Influence of loading rate and limb position on patellar tendon mechanical properties in vivo.
Impingement mechanism
Jump action
Mechanical properties
Journal
Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)
ISSN: 1879-1271
Titre abrégé: Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon)
Pays: England
ID NLM: 8611877
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
17
02
2018
revised:
04
11
2018
accepted:
09
11
2018
pubmed:
25
11
2018
medline:
12
2
2020
entrez:
25
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The aims of this study were to clarify the changes of patellar tendon length during isometric knee joint extension and the double leg squat position using ultrasonography. The left legs of 17 healthy adults were investigated. Isometric knee extension motion was performed at three positions of knee flexion 30° (knee 30°), knee flexion 60° (knee 60°), knee flexion 90° (knee 90°), and at each limb position, 0% (0% peak torque (PT)), 40% (40% PT), 50% (50% PT), and 60% (60% PT) of the maximum knee joint extension torque were executed at random. Both double leg squat motions were randomly performed in three positions: hip flexion 30°, knee flexion 30°, ankle dorsiflexion 10° (squat 30°); hip joint flexion 60°, knee joint flexion 60°, ankle dorsiflexion 20° (squat 60°); and hip joint flexion 90°, knee joint flexion 90°, ankle dorsiflexion 30° (squat 90°). Ultrasonography was used to measure patellar tendon length. There were no significant changes in patellar tendon length and strain between knee flexion angles of 30°, 60°, and 90° in isometric knee joint extension and the double leg squat limb position. The loading rate and limb position do not appear to affect the length and strain of the patellar tendon.
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
The aims of this study were to clarify the changes of patellar tendon length during isometric knee joint extension and the double leg squat position using ultrasonography.
METHODS
The left legs of 17 healthy adults were investigated. Isometric knee extension motion was performed at three positions of knee flexion 30° (knee 30°), knee flexion 60° (knee 60°), knee flexion 90° (knee 90°), and at each limb position, 0% (0% peak torque (PT)), 40% (40% PT), 50% (50% PT), and 60% (60% PT) of the maximum knee joint extension torque were executed at random. Both double leg squat motions were randomly performed in three positions: hip flexion 30°, knee flexion 30°, ankle dorsiflexion 10° (squat 30°); hip joint flexion 60°, knee joint flexion 60°, ankle dorsiflexion 20° (squat 60°); and hip joint flexion 90°, knee joint flexion 90°, ankle dorsiflexion 30° (squat 90°). Ultrasonography was used to measure patellar tendon length.
FINDINGS
There were no significant changes in patellar tendon length and strain between knee flexion angles of 30°, 60°, and 90° in isometric knee joint extension and the double leg squat limb position.
INTERPRETATION
The loading rate and limb position do not appear to affect the length and strain of the patellar tendon.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30471637
pii: S0268-0033(18)30133-5
doi: 10.1016/j.clinbiomech.2018.11.006
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
52-57Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.