Contraceptive knowledge and use among women with intellectual, physical, or sensory disabilities: A systematic review.


Journal

Disability and health journal
ISSN: 1876-7583
Titre abrégé: Disabil Health J
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101306633

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
04 2019
Historique:
received: 29 06 2018
revised: 01 11 2018
accepted: 03 11 2018
pubmed: 27 11 2018
medline: 14 6 2019
entrez: 27 11 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Women spend most of their reproductive years avoiding pregnancy. However, we know little about contraceptive knowledge and use among women with disabilities, or about strategies to improve contraceptive knowledge and decision-making in this population. To systematically review published literature on women with disabilities and: 1) contraceptive knowledge; 2) attitudes and preferences regarding contraception; 3) contraceptive use; 4) barriers and facilitators to informed contraceptive use; and 5) effectiveness of interventions to improve informed contraceptive decision-making and use. We searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ERIC databases from inception through December 2017. Two reviewers independently reviewed studies for eligibility, abstracted study data, and assessed risk of bias following PRISMA guidance. We reviewed 11,659 citations to identify 62 publications of 54 unique studies (total n of women with disabilities = 21,246). No standard definition of disability existed across studies. The majority of studies focused on women with intellectual disabilities (ID). Women with ID and those who were deaf or hard-of-hearing had lower knowledge of contraceptive methods than women without disabilities. Estimates of contraceptive use varied widely, with some evidence that women with disabilities may use a narrower range of methods. Five of six studies evaluating educational interventions to increase contraceptive knowledge or use reported post-intervention improvements. Women with disabilities may use a more narrow mix of contraceptive methods and are often less knowledgeable about contraceptives than women without disabilities. Interventions to improve knowledge show some promise. A lack of data exists on contraceptive preferences among women with disabilities.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Women spend most of their reproductive years avoiding pregnancy. However, we know little about contraceptive knowledge and use among women with disabilities, or about strategies to improve contraceptive knowledge and decision-making in this population.
OBJECTIVE
To systematically review published literature on women with disabilities and: 1) contraceptive knowledge; 2) attitudes and preferences regarding contraception; 3) contraceptive use; 4) barriers and facilitators to informed contraceptive use; and 5) effectiveness of interventions to improve informed contraceptive decision-making and use.
METHODS
We searched MEDLINE, PsychINFO, the Cochrane Library, CINAHL, and ERIC databases from inception through December 2017. Two reviewers independently reviewed studies for eligibility, abstracted study data, and assessed risk of bias following PRISMA guidance.
RESULTS
We reviewed 11,659 citations to identify 62 publications of 54 unique studies (total n of women with disabilities = 21,246). No standard definition of disability existed across studies. The majority of studies focused on women with intellectual disabilities (ID). Women with ID and those who were deaf or hard-of-hearing had lower knowledge of contraceptive methods than women without disabilities. Estimates of contraceptive use varied widely, with some evidence that women with disabilities may use a narrower range of methods. Five of six studies evaluating educational interventions to increase contraceptive knowledge or use reported post-intervention improvements.
CONCLUSIONS
Women with disabilities may use a more narrow mix of contraceptive methods and are often less knowledgeable about contraceptives than women without disabilities. Interventions to improve knowledge show some promise. A lack of data exists on contraceptive preferences among women with disabilities.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30473221
pii: S1936-6574(18)30210-3
doi: 10.1016/j.dhjo.2018.11.006
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article Research Support, U.S. Gov't, P.H.S. Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

139-154

Subventions

Organisme : AHRQ HHS
ID : K12 HS022981
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Auteurs

Willi Horner-Johnson (W)

Institute on Development and Disability, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA. Electronic address: hornerjo@ohsu.edu.

Esther L Moe (EL)

Health Promotion and Sports Medicine, Division of General Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Ryan C Stoner (RC)

Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Krystal A Klein (KA)

Cambia Health Solutions, Portland, OR, USA.

Alison B Edelman (AB)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Karen B Eden (KB)

Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Elena M Andresen (EM)

OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA; Office of the Provost, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Aaron B Caughey (AB)

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Jeanne-Marie Guise (JM)

OHSU-PSU School of Public Health, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Medical Informatics and Clinical Epidemiology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH