Newly synthesized surfactants for surface mannosylation of respirable SLN assemblies to target macrophages in tuberculosis therapy.
Animals
Antibiotics, Antitubercular
/ chemistry
Cell Line
Drug Liberation
Dry Powder Inhalers
Female
Lectins, C-Type
/ metabolism
Macrophages
/ metabolism
Mannose
/ chemistry
Mannose Receptor
Mannose-Binding Lectins
/ metabolism
Mice
Mycobacterium tuberculosis
/ drug effects
Nanoparticles
/ chemistry
Receptors, Cell Surface
/ metabolism
Rifampin
/ chemistry
Surface Properties
Surface-Active Agents
Inhalation
Lipid nanoparticles
Macrophage targeting
Mannose derivatives
Respirability
Tuberculosis
Journal
Drug delivery and translational research
ISSN: 2190-3948
Titre abrégé: Drug Deliv Transl Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101540061
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
30
11
2018
medline:
18
6
2019
entrez:
29
11
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The present study reports about new solid lipid nanoparticle assemblies (SLNas) loaded with rifampicin (RIF) surface-decorated with novel mannose derivatives, designed for anti-tuberculosis (TB) inhaled therapy by dry powder inhaler (DPI). Mannose is considered a relevant ligand to achieve active drug targeting being mannose receptors (MR) overexpressed on membranes of infected alveolar macrophages (AM), which are the preferred site of Mycobacterium tuberculosis. Surface decoration of SLNas was obtained by means of newly synthesized functionalizing compounds used as surfactants in the preparation of carriers. SLNas were fully characterized in vitro determining size, morphology, drug loading, drug release, surface mannosylation, cytotoxicity, macrophage internalization extent and ability to bind MR, and intracellular RIF concentration. Moreover, the influence of these new surface functionalizing agents on SLNas aerodynamic performance was assessed by measuring particle respirability features using next generation impactor. SLNas exhibited suitable drug payload, in vitro release, and more efficient ability to enter macrophages (about 80%) compared to bare RIF (about 20%) and to non-functionalized SLNas (about 40%). The involvement of MR-specific binding has been demonstrated by saturating MR of J774 cells causing a decrease of RIF intracellular concentration of about 40%. Furthermore, it is noteworthy that the surface decoration of particles produced a poor cohesive powder with an adequate respirability (fine particle fraction ranging from about 30 to 50%). Therefore, the proposed SLNas may represent an encouraging opportunity in a perspective of an efficacious anti-TB inhaled therapy.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30484257
doi: 10.1007/s13346-018-00607-w
pii: 10.1007/s13346-018-00607-w
doi:
Substances chimiques
Antibiotics, Antitubercular
0
Lectins, C-Type
0
Mannose Receptor
0
Mannose-Binding Lectins
0
Receptors, Cell Surface
0
Surface-Active Agents
0
Mannose
PHA4727WTP
Rifampin
VJT6J7R4TR
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
298-310Références
Int J Pharm. 2003 May 12;257(1-2):283-96
pubmed: 12711183
Nat Rev Immunol. 2008 Dec;8(12):958-69
pubmed: 19029990
J Pharm Pharmacol. 2007 Jan;59(1):75-80
pubmed: 17227623
J Pharm Sci. 2015 Jul;104(7):2169-76
pubmed: 25931324
AAPS PharmSciTech. 2011 Sep;12(3):900-8
pubmed: 21732158
Int J Pharm. 2014 Jan 30;461(1-2):112-28
pubmed: 24291124
Int J Pharm. 2016 Sep 10;511(1):669-679
pubmed: 27473279
Biomacromolecules. 2011 Jul 11;12(7):2440-6
pubmed: 21657799
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2014 Nov;88(3):816-29
pubmed: 25305582
Int J Pharm. 2017 Aug 7;528(1-2):440-451
pubmed: 28624659
J Appl Toxicol. 1999 May-Jun;19(3):163-5
pubmed: 10362266
Drug Deliv Transl Res. 2018 Oct;8(5):1527-1544
pubmed: 29881970
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2008 Nov;70(3):839-44
pubmed: 18620052
Biomaterials. 2010 Apr;31(12):3395-403
pubmed: 20132980
Int J Pharm. 2014 Feb 28;462(1-2):74-82
pubmed: 24374224
Acta Biomater. 2013 Nov;9(11):8902-9
pubmed: 23796408
Int J Pharm. 2014 Aug 25;471(1-2):507-15
pubmed: 24886692
Artif Cells Nanomed Biotechnol. 2018;46(sup1):653-663
pubmed: 29433346
J Virol. 2000 Jun;74(11):5190-7
pubmed: 10799594
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2018 Jan 30;148:73-79
pubmed: 28965047
Part Fibre Toxicol. 2010 Sep 11;7:25
pubmed: 20831820
Int J Pharm. 2015 Jun 20;487(1-2):197-204
pubmed: 25843756
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2018 Jun 15;118:216-226
pubmed: 29625212
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015 Jun;12(6):1009-26
pubmed: 25912721
Nanomedicine (Lond). 2016 Sep;11(18):2457-69
pubmed: 27529369
J Immunol Methods. 1983 Dec 16;65(1-2):55-63
pubmed: 6606682
Int J Pharm. 2018 Apr 25;541(1-2):11-18
pubmed: 29454904
J Drug Target. 2009 Dec;17(10):777-87
pubmed: 19938949
Pharm Res. 2009 May;26(5):1084-92
pubmed: 19184617
Pharm Res. 2002 Oct;19(10):1439-45
pubmed: 12425460
Nanomedicine. 2012 May;8(4):468-77
pubmed: 21782778
Results Probl Cell Differ. 2001;33:105-21
pubmed: 11190670
J Control Release. 2013 May 28;168(1):41-9
pubmed: 23419950
J Biomed Nanotechnol. 2013 Jun;9(6):1076-87
pubmed: 23858973
Clin Diagn Lab Immunol. 2002 Nov;9(6):1392-5
pubmed: 12414783
Mol Pharm. 2015 Jan 5;12(1):18-33
pubmed: 25380027
Pharm Res. 2005 Jan;22(1):148-52
pubmed: 15771241
Int J Pharm. 2000 Apr 25;200(1):93-106
pubmed: 10845690
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2011 Aug;78(3):366-76
pubmed: 21324356
Sci Rep. 2017 Jun 19;7(1):3827
pubmed: 28630477
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2014 Aug 20;11(8):8581-96
pubmed: 25141003
J Immunol. 2002 Oct 1;169(7):3565-73
pubmed: 12244146
Clin Sci (Lond). 2006 Nov;111(5):307-17
pubmed: 16737441
J Pharm Pharm Sci. 2001 May-Aug;4(2):138-58
pubmed: 11466172
Drug Dev Ind Pharm. 2010 Jan;36(1):102-7
pubmed: 19656002
Eur J Pharm Sci. 2008 Jan;33(1):20-8
pubmed: 18023332
Drug Des Devel Ther. 2016 Aug 02;10:2467-75
pubmed: 27536067
Eur J Pharm Biopharm. 2015 Jan;89:163-74
pubmed: 25497488
Expert Opin Drug Deliv. 2015 Apr;12(4):583-99
pubmed: 25391992
J Cytol Mol Biol. 2014 Jan 10;1(1):
pubmed: 24672807
Int J Pharm. 2016 Nov 20;513(1-2):628-635
pubmed: 27693734
J Drug Target. 2011 Apr;19(3):219-27
pubmed: 20540651