Repeat CT Performed Within One Month of CT Conducted in the Emergency Department for Abdominal Pain: A Secondary Analysis of Data From a Prospective Multicenter Study.


Journal

AJR. American journal of roentgenology
ISSN: 1546-3141
Titre abrégé: AJR Am J Roentgenol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 7708173

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
02 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 5 12 2018
medline: 8 11 2019
entrez: 5 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

The purpose of this study is to determine both the frequency of repeat CT performed within 1 month after a patient visits the emergency department (ED) and undergoes CT evaluation for abdominal pain and the frequency of worsened or new CT-based diagnoses. Secondary analysis was performed on data collected during a prospective multicenter study. The parent study included patients who underwent CT in the ED for abdominal pain between 2012 and 2014, and these patients constituted the study group of the present analysis. The proportion of patients who underwent (in any setting) repeat abdominal CT within 1 month of the index CT examination was calculated. For each of these patients, results of the index and repeat CT scans were compared by an independent panel and categorized as follows: no change (group 1); same process, improved (group 2); same process, worse (group 3); or different process (group 4). The proportion of patients in groups 1 and 2 versus groups 3 and 4 was calculated, and patient and ED physician characteristics were compared. The parent study included 544 patients (246 of whom were men [45%]; mean patient age, 49.4 years). Of those 544 patients, 53 (10%; 95% CI, 7.5-13%) underwent repeat abdominal CT. Patients' CT comparisons were categorized as follows: group 1 for 43% of patients (23/53), group 2 for 26% (14/53), group 3 for 15% (8/53), and group 4 for 15% (8/53). New or worse findings were present in 30% of patients (16/53) (95% CI, 19-44%). When patients with findings in groups 1 and 2 were compared to patients with findings in groups 3 and 4, no significant difference was noted in patient age (p = 0.25) or sex (p = 0.76), the number of days between scans (p = 0.98), and the diagnostic confidence of the ED physician after the index CT scan was obtained (p = 0.33). Short-term, repeat abdominal CT was performed for 10% of patients who underwent CT in the ED for abdominal pain, and it yielded new or worse findings for 30% of those patients.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30512995
doi: 10.2214/AJR.18.20060
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

382-385

Auteurs

Leslie K Lee (LK)

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.
2 Present address: Department of Radiology, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, MA.

Andrew T Reisner (AT)

3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

William D Binder (WD)

3 Department of Emergency Medicine, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
4 Present address: Department of Emergency Medicine, Brown University, Providence, RI.

Atif Zaheer (A)

5 Department of Radiology, Johns Hopkins University, Baltimore, MD.

Martin L Gunn (ML)

6 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Ken F Linnau (KF)

6 Department of Radiology, University of Washington, Seattle, WA.

Chad M Miller (CM)

7 Department of Radiology, Duke University Medical Center, Durham, NC.

Maurice S Herring (MS)

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.
8 Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.
9 Present address: Cedars Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA.

Angela C Tramontano (AC)

8 Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Avinash Kambadakone (A)

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.

Onofrio A Catalano (OA)

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.

Mukesh Harisinghani (M)

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.

Elkan F Halpern (EF)

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.
8 Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Karen Donelan (K)

10 Department of Medicine, Mongan Institute for Health Policy Center, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

G Scott Gazelle (GS)

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.
8 Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Pari V Pandharipande (PV)

1 Department of Radiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 55 Fruit St, Boston, MA 02114.
8 Institute for Technology Assessment, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston, MA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH