Comparing external and internal validation methods in correcting outcome misclassification bias in logistic regression: A simulation study and application to the case of postsurgical venous thromboembolism following total hip and knee arthroplasty.
Administrative Claims, Healthcare
/ statistics & numerical data
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Hip
/ adverse effects
Arthroplasty, Replacement, Knee
/ adverse effects
Bayes Theorem
Computer Simulation
Data Accuracy
Diagnostic Errors
/ statistics & numerical data
Female
Hospitals
/ statistics & numerical data
Humans
Logistic Models
Male
Middle Aged
Odds Ratio
Postoperative Complications
/ diagnosis
Quebec
/ epidemiology
Risk Assessment
/ methods
Sensitivity and Specificity
Validation Studies as Topic
Venous Thromboembolism
/ diagnosis
Bayesian
external validation
misclassification
multiple imputation
odds ratio
pharmacoepidemiology
venous thromboembolism
Journal
Pharmacoepidemiology and drug safety
ISSN: 1099-1557
Titre abrégé: Pharmacoepidemiol Drug Saf
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9208369
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
30
12
2017
revised:
10
09
2018
accepted:
03
10
2018
pubmed:
6
12
2018
medline:
24
3
2020
entrez:
6
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We assessed the validity of postsurgery venous thromboembolism (VTE) diagnoses identified from administrative databases and compared Bayesian and multiple imputation (MI) approaches in correcting for outcome misclassification in logistic regression models. Sensitivity and specificity of postsurgery VTE among patients undergoing total hip or knee replacement (THR/TKR) were assessed against chart review in six Montreal hospitals in 2009 to 2010. Administrative data on all THR/TKR Quebec patients in 2009 to 2010 were obtained. The performance of Bayesian external, Bayesian internal, and MI approaches to correct the odds ratio (OR) of postsurgery VTE in tertiary versus community hospitals was assessed using simulations. Bayesian external approach used prior information from external sources, while Bayesian internal and MI approaches used chart review. In total, 17 319 patients were included, 2136 in participating hospitals, among whom 75 had VTE in administrative data versus 81 in chart review. VTE sensitivity was 0.59 (95% confidence interval, 0.48-0.69) and specificity was 0.99 (0.98-0.99), overall. The adjusted OR of VTE in tertiary versus community hospitals was 1.35 (1.12-1.64) using administrative data, 1.45 (0.97-2.19) when MI was used for misclassification correction, and 1.53 (0.83-2.87) and 1.57 (0.39-5.24) when Bayesian internal and external approaches were used, respectively. In simulations, all three approaches reduced the OR bias and had appropriate coverage for both nondifferential and differential misclassification. VTE identified from administrative data had low sensitivity and high specificity. The Bayesian external approach was useful to reduce outcome misclassification bias in logistic regression; however, it required accurate specification of the misclassification properties and should be used with caution.
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Evaluation Study
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
217-226Subventions
Organisme : CIHR
Pays : Canada
Informations de copyright
© 2018 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.