Feasibility and utility of intraoperative epicardial scar characterization during left ventricular assist device implantation.
Action Potentials
Aged
Arrhythmias, Cardiac
/ diagnosis
Cicatrix
/ complications
Epicardial Mapping
Feasibility Studies
Female
Heart Failure
/ complications
Heart-Assist Devices
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Pericardium
/ pathology
Prospective Studies
Prosthesis Design
Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Risk Assessment
Risk Factors
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Ventricular Function, Left
Young Adult
epicardial
left ventricular assist device
mapping
mechanical circulatory support
ventricular arrhythmia
Journal
Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
ISSN: 1540-8167
Titre abrégé: J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9010756
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
02 2019
02 2019
Historique:
received:
14
10
2018
revised:
29
10
2018
accepted:
06
11
2018
pubmed:
6
12
2018
medline:
13
3
2020
entrez:
6
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Ventricular arrhythmias (VA) after left ventricular assist device (LVAD) placement are associated with increased morbidity and mortality. We sought to assess epicardial voltage characteristics at the time of LVAD implantation and investigate relationships between scar burden and postimplant VA. Consecutive patients underwent open chest epicardial electroanatomic mapping immediately before LVAD implantation. Areas of low voltage and sites with local abnormal potentials were identified. Patients were followed prospectively for postimplant VA and clinical outcomes. Between 2015 and 2017, 36 patients underwent high-density intraoperative epicardial voltage mapping; 15 had complete maps suitable for analysis. Mapping required a median of 11.8 (interquartile range [IQR], 8.5-12.7) minutes, with a median of 2650 (IQR, 2139-3191) points sampled per patient. Over a median follow-up of 311 (IQR, 168-469) postoperative days, four patients (27%) experienced sustained VA. Patients with postimplant VA were more likely to have had preimplant implantable cardioverter defibrillator shocks (100% vs 27%; P = 0.03), ventricular tachycardia storm (75% vs 9%; P = 0.03), and lower ejection fraction (13.5 vs 19.0%, P = 0.05). Patients with postimplant VA also had a significantly higher burden of epicardial low bipolar voltage points: 55.4% vs 24.9% of points were less than 0.5 mV (P = 0.01), and 88.9% vs 63.7% of points less than 1.5 mV (P = 0.004). Intraoperative high-density epicardial mapping during LVAD implantation is safe and efficient, facilitating characterization of a potentially arrhythmogenic substrate. An increased burden of the epicardial scar may be associated with a higher incidence of postimplant VA. The role of empiric intraoperative epicardial ablation to mitigate risk of postimplant VA requires further study.
Types de publication
Journal Article
Video-Audio Media
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
183-192Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2018 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.