Examination of differential validity of MMPI-2-RF scores by gender and ethnicity in predicting future suicidal and violent behaviors in a forensic sample.


Journal

Psychological assessment
ISSN: 1939-134X
Titre abrégé: Psychol Assess
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8915253

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 7 12 2018
medline: 7 5 2019
entrez: 7 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Given the diversity of individuals who undergo psychological assessment, examining whether cultural bias exists in psychological assessment instruments (i.e., differential validity) is crucial. This issue occurs when a measure systematically over- or underpredicts a criterion across demographic groups or is associated with the criterion unequally across the groups. We tested the differential validity of a widely used psychological test, the Minnesota Multiphasic Personality Inventory (MMPI)-2-Restructured Form (MMPI-2-RF), as a function of gender (male, female) and ethnicity (Caucasian, African American, and Hispanic/Latino American) in large samples of forensic psychiatric inpatients. Regression models were estimated in a multigroup framework. The analyses yielded negligible to small statistical evidence of differential validity in MMPI-2-RF scores predicting the number of future suicidal behaviors and violent behaviors in the samples. This evidence supports use of the MMPI-2-RF as a generally unbiased instrument for predicting key criteria across genders and ethnicities in a forensic psychiatric population. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2019 APA, all rights reserved).

Identifiants

pubmed: 30520653
pii: 2018-61690-001
doi: 10.1037/pas0000677
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

404-409

Subventions

Organisme : University of Minnesota Press

Auteurs

Megan R Whitman (MR)

Department of Psychology, John Carroll University.

Anthony M Tarescavage (AM)

Department of Psychology, John Carroll University.

David M Glassmire (DM)

Department of Psychology, Patton State Hospital.

Danielle Burchett (D)

Department of Psychology, California State University, Monterey Bay.

Martin Sellbom (M)

Department of Psychology, University of Otago.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH