Randomized Phase II Study Evaluating Palbociclib in Addition to Letrozole as Neoadjuvant Therapy in Estrogen Receptor-Positive Early Breast Cancer: PALLET Trial.


Journal

Journal of clinical oncology : official journal of the American Society of Clinical Oncology
ISSN: 1527-7755
Titre abrégé: J Clin Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8309333

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
20 01 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 14 12 2018
medline: 30 10 2019
entrez: 8 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

CDK4/6 inhibitors are used to treat estrogen receptor (ER)-positive metastatic breast cancer (BC) in combination with endocrine therapy. PALLET is a phase II randomized trial that evaluated the effects of combination palbociclib plus letrozole as neoadjuvant therapy. Postmenopausal women with ER-positive primary BC and tumors greater than or equal to 2.0 cm were randomly assigned 3:2:2:2 to letrozole (2.5 mg/d) for 14 weeks (A); letrozole for 2 weeks, then palbociclib plus letrozole to 14 weeks (B); palbociclib for 2 weeks, then palbociclib plus letrozole to 14 weeks (C); or palbociclib plus letrozole for 14 weeks. Palbociclib 125 mg/d was administered orally on a 21-days-on, 7-days-off schedule. Core-cut biopsies were taken at baseline and 2 and 14 weeks. Coprimary end points for letrozole versus palbociclib plus letrozole groups (A v B + C + D) were change in Ki-67 (protein encoded by the  MKI67 gene; immunohistochemistry) between baseline and 14 weeks and clinical response (ordinal and ultrasound) after 14 weeks. Complete cell-cycle arrest was defined as Ki-67 less than or equal to 2.7%. Apoptosis was characterized by cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase. Three hundred seven patients were recruited. Clinical response was not significantly different between palbociclib plus letrozole and letrozole groups ( P = .20; complete response + partial response, 54.3% v 49.5%), and progressive disease was 3.2% versus 5.4%, respectively. Median log-fold change in Ki-67 was greater with palbociclib plus letrozole compared with letrozole (-4.1 v -2.2; P < .001) in the 190 evaluable patients (61.9%), corresponding to a geometric mean change of -97.4% versus -88.5%. More patients on palbociclib plus letrozole achieved complete cell-cycle arrest (90% v 59%; P < .001). Median log-fold change (suppression) of cleaved poly (ADP-ribose) polymerase was greater with palbociclib plus letrozole versus letrozole (-0.80 v -0.42; P < .001). More patients had grade 3 or greater toxicity on palbociclib plus letrozole (49.8% v 17.0%; P < .001) mainly because of asymptomatic neutropenia. Adding palbociclib to letrozole significantly enhanced the suppression of malignant cell proliferation (Ki-67) in primary ER-positive BC, but did not increase the clinical response rate over 14 weeks, which was possibly related to a concurrent reduction in apoptosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30523750
doi: 10.1200/JCO.18.01624
doi:

Substances chimiques

Aromatase Inhibitors 0
Piperazines 0
Protein Kinase Inhibitors 0
Pyridines 0
Receptors, Estrogen 0
Letrozole 7LKK855W8I
ERBB2 protein, human EC 2.7.10.1
Receptor, ErbB-2 EC 2.7.10.1
palbociclib G9ZF61LE7G

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

178-189

Subventions

Organisme : Cancer Research UK
ID : C1491/A15955
Pays : United Kingdom
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom

Auteurs

Stephen Johnston (S)

1 The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Shannon Puhalla (S)

2 Univeristy of Pittsburgh Medical Center Cancer Center, Pittsburgh, PA.

Duncan Wheatley (D)

3 Royal Cornwall Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, Treliske, United Kingdom.

Alistair Ring (A)

1 The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Peter Barry (P)

1 The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Chris Holcombe (C)

4 Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals National Health Service Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

Jean Francois Boileau (JF)

5 Montreal Jewish General Hospital Segal Cancer Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Louise Provencher (L)

6 Centre Hospitalier Université de Quebec-Universite Laval, Quebec City, Quebec, Canada.

André Robidoux (A)

7 Centre Hospitalier Université de Montréal, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

Mothaffar Rimawi (M)

8 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Stuart A McIntosh (SA)

9 Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, United Kingdom.

Ibrahim Shalaby (I)

10 Joe Arrington Cancer Research and Treatment Center, Lubbock, TX.

Robert C Stein (RC)

11 National Institute for Health Research University College London Hospitals Biomedical Research Centre, London, United Kingdom.
12 University College London Hospitals National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Michael Thirlwell (M)

13 McGill University Health Centre, Montreal, Quebec, Canada.

David Dolling (D)

14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

James Morden (J)

14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Claire Snowdon (C)

14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Sophie Perry (S)

14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Chester Cornman (C)

15 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA.

Leona M Batten (LM)

14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Lisa K Jeffs (LK)

14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Andrew Dodson (A)

1 The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Vera Martins (V)

1 The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

Arjun Modi (A)

1 The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.

C Kent Osborne (CK)

8 Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, TX.

Katherine L Pogue-Geile (KL)

15 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA.

Maggie Chon U Cheang (MCU)

14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Norman Wolmark (N)

15 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA.

Thomas B Julian (TB)

16 Allegheny Health Network Cancer Institute, Pittsburgh, PA.

Kate Fisher (K)

17 International Drug Development Institute, Brussels, Belgium.

Mairead MacKenzie (M)

18 Independent Cancer Patients Voice, London, United Kingdom.

Maggie Wilcox (M)

18 Independent Cancer Patients Voice, London, United Kingdom.

Cynthia Huang Bartlett (C)

19 Pfizer, New York, NY.

Maria Koehler (M)

20 Bicycle Therapeutics, Boston, MA.

Mitch Dowsett (M)

1 The Royal Marsden National Health Service Foundation Trust, London, United Kingdom.
14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Judith M Bliss (JM)

14 The Institute of Cancer Research, London, United Kingdom.

Samuel A Jacobs (SA)

15 National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Foundation, Pittsburgh, PA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH