Renal cell carcinoma and brain metastasis: Questioning the dogma of role for cytoreductive nephrectomy.


Journal

Urologic oncology
ISSN: 1873-2496
Titre abrégé: Urol Oncol
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 9805460

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 06 06 2018
revised: 31 08 2018
accepted: 16 10 2018
pubmed: 12 12 2018
medline: 15 2 2020
entrez: 12 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Renal cell carcinoma (RCC) brain metastasis is generally viewed as poor prognostic features and often excludes patients from cytoreductive nephrectomy or participation in clinical trials. We aim to evaluate patients presenting with brain metastasis and their outcomes. Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results-18 registries database was queried for all patients with metastatic RCC from 2010 to 2014. Patients with renal cancer as their only malignancy were included. Information was available for metastatic disease to bone, liver, lung, and brain. Patients were then further stratified into those with isolated brain metastases and those with additional metastasis to other sites as well. Overall survival was compared between groups using logrank analysis. A total of 6,667 patients were identified with metastatic RCC. Among them, 775 (12.1%) had brain metastasis at time of diagnosis. Of these patients with brain metastasis, 152 (20.4%) had isolated brain metastasis. Only 23.8% of all patients with brain metastasis underwent cytoreductive nephrectomy, compared to 40.8% of patients with isolated brain metastasis. Patients with brain and other metastasis and brain metastasis only treated by cytoreductive nephrectomy exhibited a median survival of 11 and 33 months, respectively. Those patients who did not undergo cytoreductive nephrectomy experienced a median survival of 4 and 5 months, respectively. It appears that selected patients with brain metastasis may experience durable long-term survival. This information may be beneficial for patient counseling, surgical planning, and consideration for inclusion in clinical trials.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30528396
pii: S1078-1439(18)30405-8
doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2018.10.021
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Comparative Study Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

182.e9-182.e15

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Michael Daugherty (M)

Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.

Emily Daugherty (E)

Department of Radiation Oncology, University of Cincinnati, Cincinnati, OH.

Joseph Jacob (J)

Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.

Oleg Shapiro (O)

Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.

Mehdi Mollapour (M)

Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY.

Gennady Bratslavsky (G)

Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY; Department of Urology, SUNY Upstate Medical University, Syracuse, NY. Electronic address: bratslag@upstate.edu.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH