Use of Assistive Devices to Lift, Transfer, and Reposition Hospital Patients.


Journal

Nursing research
ISSN: 1538-9847
Titre abrégé: Nurs Res
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0376404

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Historique:
entrez: 13 12 2018
pubmed: 13 12 2018
medline: 27 2 2019
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Devices to lift, transfer, and reposition patients are recommended for healthcare workers' and patients' safety, but their intended use has yet to be fully realized. The aim of this study was to describe hospital nursing staff use of lift/transfer devices and the presence of factors at the time of lifts/transfers with potential to influence whether devices are used. Participants were 108 US nursing staff in a university-based medical center and two community hospitals. A self-completed questionnaire was used to collect demographic and work characteristics, typical frequency of patient lifts/transfers, training in and typical use of lift equipment, and specific factors that could influence use. Proportional distributions of lifting/transferring and repositioning frequencies in a typical shift, amount of equipment use, and factors present were examined overall and across worker and work-related characteristics. Although trained in equipment use, only 40% used equipment for at least half of lifts/transfers. During lifts/transfers, factors often present included patient unable to help with lift/transfer (91.3%) or of a size/weight where participant needed assistance to help lift/transfer (87.5%); availability of others who could assist with manual lift (86.3%) or use of lift equipment (82.4%); and equipment functioning properly (86.4%), having supplies available (82.5%), and being easy to retrieve from storage (81.6%). During repositioning tasks, physical assistance was "always/almost always" provided from coworkers (83.3%) and often perceived as "very helpful" (92.6%) in reducing physical demands. Physical assistance from patients was less common (14.0% "always/almost always") yet perceived as "very helpful" by 66.3%. One fifth always used friction-reducing devices. Despite training in their use, nursing staff use of available lift equipment and assistive devices is limited. Factors present at the time of lifts/transfers that may influence equipment/device use reflect a complex mix of patient, worker, equipment, and situational characteristics.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Devices to lift, transfer, and reposition patients are recommended for healthcare workers' and patients' safety, but their intended use has yet to be fully realized.
OBJECTIVE
The aim of this study was to describe hospital nursing staff use of lift/transfer devices and the presence of factors at the time of lifts/transfers with potential to influence whether devices are used.
METHODS
Participants were 108 US nursing staff in a university-based medical center and two community hospitals. A self-completed questionnaire was used to collect demographic and work characteristics, typical frequency of patient lifts/transfers, training in and typical use of lift equipment, and specific factors that could influence use. Proportional distributions of lifting/transferring and repositioning frequencies in a typical shift, amount of equipment use, and factors present were examined overall and across worker and work-related characteristics.
RESULTS
Although trained in equipment use, only 40% used equipment for at least half of lifts/transfers. During lifts/transfers, factors often present included patient unable to help with lift/transfer (91.3%) or of a size/weight where participant needed assistance to help lift/transfer (87.5%); availability of others who could assist with manual lift (86.3%) or use of lift equipment (82.4%); and equipment functioning properly (86.4%), having supplies available (82.5%), and being easy to retrieve from storage (81.6%). During repositioning tasks, physical assistance was "always/almost always" provided from coworkers (83.3%) and often perceived as "very helpful" (92.6%) in reducing physical demands. Physical assistance from patients was less common (14.0% "always/almost always") yet perceived as "very helpful" by 66.3%. One fifth always used friction-reducing devices.
DISCUSSION
Despite training in their use, nursing staff use of available lift equipment and assistive devices is limited. Factors present at the time of lifts/transfers that may influence equipment/device use reflect a complex mix of patient, worker, equipment, and situational characteristics.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30540690
doi: 10.1097/NNR.0000000000000325
pii: 00006199-201901000-00002
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

3-12

Subventions

Organisme : NIH HHS
ID : R21OH010542
Pays : United States

Auteurs

Ashley L Schoenfisch (AL)

Ashley Schoenfisch, PhD, MSPH, is Assistant Professor, Duke University School of Nursing, and Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Kristen L. Kucera, PhD, MSPH, ATC, LAT, is Assistant Professor, Department of Exercise and Sport Science, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, and Director, National Center for Catastrophic Sport Injury Research, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Hester J. Lipscomb, PhD, is Professor Emeritus, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Jennifer McIlvaine, PT, MSPT, CSPHA, is Physical Therapist, Safe Patient Handling Specialist, Duke Occupational and Environmental Safety Office, Durham, North Carolina. Lori Becherer, BS, is Staff Specialist, Duke Occupational and Environmental Safety Office, Durham, North Carolina, and Injury Prevention Research Center, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill. Tamara James, MA, CPE, CSPHP, is Director, Ergonomics, Duke Occupational and Environmental Safety Office, and Assistant Professor, Division of Occupational and Environmental Medicine, Department of Community and Family Medicine, Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, North Carolina. Susan Avent, MSN, MBA, MHA, RN, NEA-BC, is Associate Chief Nursing Officer, Quality, Duke University Health System, Durham, North Carolina.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH