Impact on medical practice of accessing pharmaceutical records.
Access to Information
Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anesthesiologists
/ organization & administration
Electronic Health Records
/ statistics & numerical data
Emergency Service, Hospital
/ organization & administration
Female
Geriatricians
/ organization & administration
Humans
Male
Medication Therapy Management
Middle Aged
Pharmacists
/ organization & administration
Practice Patterns, Physicians'
/ standards
Prospective Studies
Young Adult
Electronic health record
Medication history
Patient management
Pharmaceutical record system
Journal
International journal of medical informatics
ISSN: 1872-8243
Titre abrégé: Int J Med Inform
Pays: Ireland
ID NLM: 9711057
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 2019
01 2019
Historique:
received:
31
01
2018
revised:
24
04
2018
accepted:
09
09
2018
entrez:
15
12
2018
pubmed:
14
12
2018
medline:
6
7
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The pharmaceutical record system (PRS) is a French nationwide centralized electronic database shared among all community pharmacists listing all drugs dispensed by community pharmacists in the last four months. The objective of this study, the Medication Assessment Through Real time Information eXchange - Distributed Pharmaceutical Record System (MATRIX - DPRS) study, was to assess the clinical impact of the PRS upon granting access to physicians in three hospital specialties: anesthesiology, emergency medicine and geriatrics. A multicenter prospective study was conducted in six hospital departments, two per specialty. Participating physicians noted medication information found exclusively in the pharmaceutical record (PR) of each patient unavailable elsewhere and any diagnostic or therapeutic management changes resulting from the PR information. The primary objective was to assess the proportion of diagnostic or therapeutic management changes attributable to the PR among patients who had an accessible PR. The inclusion level ranged from 1.1 to 30% in the six departments. The rate of diagnostic or therapeutic management changes was highest in geriatrics (n = 31/67; 46.3% 95% Confidence IntervaI (CI): 34.0-58.9%) and lowest in anesthesiology (n = 36/227; 15.9% 95% CI: 11.4-21.3%). Emergency medicine was intermediate (n = 5/22; 22.7% 95% CI: 7.8-45.4%). Although the inclusion rate and statistical precision were low, these findings suggest that the information contained in the PRS is useful and may result in modifying patient management in a sizeable proportion of patients. This opens the prospect of evaluating other hospital specialties, as well as primary and secondary care settings.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30545490
pii: S1386-5056(18)30396-4
doi: 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2018.09.010
pii:
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Multicenter Study
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
58-63Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.