Comparison of lung imaging using three-dimensional ultrashort echo time and zero echo time sequences: preliminary study.
Lung
Magnetic resonance imaging
Ultrashort T2
Ultrashort echo time
Zero-echo-time imaging
Journal
European radiology
ISSN: 1432-1084
Titre abrégé: Eur Radiol
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9114774
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
May 2019
May 2019
Historique:
received:
02
07
2018
accepted:
13
11
2018
revised:
29
09
2018
pubmed:
14
12
2018
medline:
30
5
2019
entrez:
15
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
To determine the feasibility of using high-resolution volumetric zero echo time (ZTE) sequence in routine lung magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and compare free breathing 3D ultrashort echo time (UTE) and ZTE lung MRI in terms of image quality and small-nodule detection. Our Institutional Review Board approved this study. Twenty patients underwent both UTE and ZTE sequences during routine lung MR. UTE and ZTE images were compared in terms of subjective image quality and detection of lung parenchymal signal, intrapulmonary structures, and sub-centimeter nodules. Differences between the two sequences were compared through statistical analysis. Lung parenchyma showed significantly (p < 0.05) higher signal-to-noise ratio (SNR) in ZTE than in UTE. The SNR and contrast-to-noise ratio (CNR) of peripheral bronchus and small pulmonary arteries were significantly (all p < 0.05) higher in ZTE. Subjective image quality evaluated by two independent radiologists in terms of depicting normal structures and overall acceptability was superior in ZTE (p < 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy for sub-centimeter nodules was significantly higher for ZTE (reader 1: AUC, 0.972; p = 0.044; reader 2: AUC, 0.946; p = 0.045) than that for UTE (reader 1: AUC, 0.885; reader 2: AUC, 0.855). Mean scan time was 131 s (125-141 s) in ZTE and 467 s (453-508 s) in UTE. ZTE images were obtained with less acoustic noise. Implementing ZTE as an additional sequence in routine lung MR is feasible. ZTE can provide high-resolution pulmonary structural information with better SNR and CNR using shorter time than UTE. • Both UTE and ZTE techniques use very short TEs to capture signals from very short T2/T2* tissues. • ZTE is superior in capturing lung parenchymal signal than UTE. • ZTE provides high-resolution structural information with better SNR and CNR for normal intrapulmonary structures and small nodules using shorter scan time than UTE.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30547204
doi: 10.1007/s00330-018-5889-x
pii: 10.1007/s00330-018-5889-x
doi:
Types de publication
Comparative Study
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2253-2262Références
NMR Biomed. 2015 Nov;28(11):1471-9
pubmed: 26403226
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2018 Feb;210(2):404-411
pubmed: 29112472
Eur J Radiol. 1999 Mar;29(3):245-52
pubmed: 10399610
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2015 May;41(5):1465-74
pubmed: 24965907
Magn Reson Med. 2006 Mar;55(3):575-82
pubmed: 16450366
J Thorac Imaging. 1993 Winter;8(1):12-7
pubmed: 8418315
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2010 Aug;32(2):326-33
pubmed: 20677258
Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2018 Jun;39(3):249-259
pubmed: 29807635
Magn Reson Med. 2016 Jan;75(1):107-14
pubmed: 25639956
Diagn Interv Radiol. 2014 Jul-Aug;20(4):360-3
pubmed: 24808439
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Aug;70(2):328-32
pubmed: 23776142
Eur Radiol. 2008 Oct;18(10):2120-31
pubmed: 18458913
MAGMA. 2015 Jun;28(3):207-15
pubmed: 25200814
Radiology. 2016 Jan;278(1):239-46
pubmed: 26133050
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2017 Mar;45(3):839-844
pubmed: 27490158
Magn Reson Med. 1995 May;33(5):678-82
pubmed: 7596272
NMR Biomed. 2014 Sep;27(9):1129-34
pubmed: 25066371
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2001 Feb;13(2):288-93
pubmed: 11169836
Clin Radiol. 2004 Aug;59(8):727-35
pubmed: 15262548
Radiology. 2017 Jul;284(1):228-243
pubmed: 28240562
J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2003 Nov-Dec;27(6):825-46
pubmed: 14600447
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2014 Apr;39(4):988-97
pubmed: 24123342
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2016 Feb;43(2):512-32
pubmed: 26223818
Magn Reson Med Sci. 2017 Jul 10;16(3):209-216
pubmed: 27795484
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2018 Jan;144(1):117-125
pubmed: 28932985
J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Jan;19(1):99-107
pubmed: 14696226
Clin Radiol. 2003 Jan;58(1):1-19
pubmed: 12565203
Magn Reson Med. 2013 Nov;70(5):1241-50
pubmed: 23213020
Magn Reson Med. 2011 Jul;66(1):248-54
pubmed: 21695727
NMR Biomed. 2015 Feb;28(2):247-54
pubmed: 25521814