Low-dose CT scan in stone detection for stone treatment follow-up: is there a relation between stone composition and radiation delivery? Study on a porcine-kidney model.


Journal

Minerva urologica e nefrologica = The Italian journal of urology and nephrology
ISSN: 1827-1758
Titre abrégé: Minerva Urol Nefrol
Pays: Italy
ID NLM: 8503649

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Feb 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 15 12 2018
medline: 9 4 2019
entrez: 15 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Non-contrast CT scan (NCCT) is becoming the standard imaging modality in urinary stone disease. Radiation dose remains an issue, especially for those patients who may need to undergo several CT scans for this indication during their lifetime. Low-dose and ultra-low-dose protocols exist, but there is limited data on the relationship between the minimum radiation dose capable of detecting stone fragments and stone composition. Seven different kinds of human kidney stone were selected. Fragments of 1, 2, 4 and 7 mm were obtained for each stone. Four fragments of the same material were placed in a porcine kidney. A CT scan was then used to scan the kidney at decreasing dosages of 140, 70, 30, 15 and 7mAs. The scans were repeated for each type of stone. Images were reviewed by two radiologists independently with the intent of identifying the stone composition and providing information on its position, dimensions and Hounsfield units (HU). All types of stone were visible at all settings. Only the 1-mm uric-acid fragment was not detected by both radiologists at 7 and 15 mAs. Dose Length product (DLP) decreased with the reduction in mAs. In terms of HU a statistically significant difference was observed between calcium-based and non-calcium-based stones. Stone dimensions and HU were not affected by the reductions in mAs. Ultra-low-dose CT has a good detection rate for all kinds of stone, even when the fragment size is small. Only small uric acid fragments need higher energy settings in order to be detected. When the stone composition is known after surgery for urolithiasis, the most appropriate CT scan setting could be suggested by the urologist during their follow-up.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Non-contrast CT scan (NCCT) is becoming the standard imaging modality in urinary stone disease. Radiation dose remains an issue, especially for those patients who may need to undergo several CT scans for this indication during their lifetime. Low-dose and ultra-low-dose protocols exist, but there is limited data on the relationship between the minimum radiation dose capable of detecting stone fragments and stone composition.
METHODS METHODS
Seven different kinds of human kidney stone were selected. Fragments of 1, 2, 4 and 7 mm were obtained for each stone. Four fragments of the same material were placed in a porcine kidney. A CT scan was then used to scan the kidney at decreasing dosages of 140, 70, 30, 15 and 7mAs. The scans were repeated for each type of stone. Images were reviewed by two radiologists independently with the intent of identifying the stone composition and providing information on its position, dimensions and Hounsfield units (HU).
RESULTS RESULTS
All types of stone were visible at all settings. Only the 1-mm uric-acid fragment was not detected by both radiologists at 7 and 15 mAs. Dose Length product (DLP) decreased with the reduction in mAs. In terms of HU a statistically significant difference was observed between calcium-based and non-calcium-based stones. Stone dimensions and HU were not affected by the reductions in mAs.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
Ultra-low-dose CT has a good detection rate for all kinds of stone, even when the fragment size is small. Only small uric acid fragments need higher energy settings in order to be detected. When the stone composition is known after surgery for urolithiasis, the most appropriate CT scan setting could be suggested by the urologist during their follow-up.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30547905
pii: S0393-2249.18.03265-4
doi: 10.23736/S0393-2249.18.03265-4
doi:

Substances chimiques

Uric Acid 268B43MJ25
Calcium SY7Q814VUP

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

63-71

Auteurs

Michele Talso (M)

Urology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy - michele.talso@gmail.com.
Urology Department, ASST Vimercate Hospital, Vimercate, Monza Brianza, Italy - michele.talso@gmail.com.

Estenan Emiliani (E)

Urology Department, Fundación Puigvert, Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Barcelona, Spain.

Sara Froio (S)

Intensive Care Unit, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Andrea Gallioli (A)

Urology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Laura Forzenigo (L)

Radiology Department, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Benjamin Pradere (B)

Urology Department, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Olivier Traxer (O)

Urology Department, Tenon Hospital, Sorbonne University, Paris, France.

Bhaskar K Somani (BK)

Urology Department, University Hospital Southampton NHS Trust, Southampton, UK.

Emanuele Montanari (E)

Urology Department, Fondazione IRCSS Ca' Granda, Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH