Bone-targeted agent treatment patterns and the impact of bone metastases on patients with advanced breast cancer in the United States.


Journal

Current medical research and opinion
ISSN: 1473-4877
Titre abrégé: Curr Med Res Opin
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0351014

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
pubmed: 15 12 2018
medline: 6 2 2020
entrez: 15 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bone metastases are common among patients with advanced breast cancer, putting patients at increased risk of skeletal-related events (SREs). This study described impact of bone metastases, utilization of bone-targeted agents (BTAs) and physicians' decision processes for BTA use in advanced breast cancer. Data were collected using the Adelphi Breast Cancer Disease-Specific Programme in the United States. Physicians completed a detailed record for eligible patients (women ≥18 years, with stage IIIB-IV breast cancer). Data available from 1276 patients with advanced breast cancer included 485 (38%) with bone metastases. Most (80%) reported pain at bone metastasis diagnosis; of those reporting pain, 55% reported moderate to severe pain. Among patients with bone metastasis, 69% received a BTA. Reasons for initiating BTAs were bone pain (32%) and an estimated high risk of SREs (25%). Reasons for not treating with BTAs were very recent diagnosis (37%), poor Karnofsky performance status (14%), perceived low risk of SREs (11%) and short life expectancy (11%). Zoledronic acid (48%) and denosumab (42%) were commonly used BTAs; the main reasons for initiating BTA treatment were long-term safety (28% and 32%, respectively) and efficacy in delaying SREs (15% and 31%, respectively). The analysis was not adjusted for age or other possible confounders. Bone pain is a common and sometimes severe symptom of bone metastases in advanced breast cancer and a common reason for initiating BTA treatment. Safety and efficacy were the main factors considered by physicians when selecting BTAs.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30550358
doi: 10.1080/03007995.2018.1558849
doi:

Substances chimiques

Bone Density Conservation Agents 0
Denosumab 4EQZ6YO2HI
Zoledronic Acid 6XC1PAD3KF

Types de publication

Journal Article Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

375-381

Auteurs

David Henry (D)

a Department of Oncology , Joan Karnell Cancer Center, Pennsylvania Hospital , Philadelphia , PA , USA.

Roger von Moos (R)

b Department of Oncology , Kantonsspital Graubünden , Chur , Switzerland.

Jean-Jacques Body (JJ)

c Department of Oncology , CHU Brugmann, ULB , Brussels , Belgium.

Alex Rider (A)

d Adelphi Real World , Bollington , UK.

Jonathan De Courcy (J)

d Adelphi Real World , Bollington , UK.

Debajyoti Bhowmik (D)

e Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc. , Thousand Oaks , CA , USA.

Francesca Gatta (F)

f Global Health Economics, Amgen (Europe) GmbH , Zug , Switzerland.

Guy Hechmati (G)

e Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc. , Thousand Oaks , CA , USA.

Yi Qian (Y)

e Global Health Economics, Amgen Inc. , Thousand Oaks , CA , USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH