Phase II Randomized Trial of Sequential or Concurrent FOLFOXIRI-Bevacizumab Versus FOLFOX-Bevacizumab for Metastatic Colorectal Cancer (STEAM).


Journal

The oncologist
ISSN: 1549-490X
Titre abrégé: Oncologist
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9607837

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
07 2019
Historique:
received: 14 06 2018
accepted: 06 11 2018
pubmed: 16 12 2018
medline: 10 7 2020
entrez: 16 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

First-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically entails a biologic such as bevacizumab (BEV) with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI). STEAM (NCT01765582) assessed the efficacy of BEV plus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI (FOLFOXIRI), administered concurrently (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV) or sequentially (sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, FOLFOX-BEV alternating with FOLFIRI-BEV), versus FOLFOX-BEV for mCRC. Patients with previously untreated mCRC ( ORR was 72.0%, 72.8%, and 62.1% and median PFS was 11.9, 11.4, and 9.5 months with cFOLFOXIRI-BEV, sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, and FOLFOX-BEV, respectively. OS was similar between arms. ORR between cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and FOLFOX-BEV did not significantly differ ( cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and sFOLFOXIRI-BEV were well tolerated with numerically improved ORR, PFS, and liver resection rates versus FOLFOX-BEV, supporting triplet chemotherapy plus BEV as a first-line treatment option for mCRC

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
First-line treatment for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) typically entails a biologic such as bevacizumab (BEV) with 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/oxaliplatin (FOLFOX) or 5-fluorouracil/leucovorin/irinotecan (FOLFIRI). STEAM (NCT01765582) assessed the efficacy of BEV plus FOLFOX/FOLFIRI (FOLFOXIRI), administered concurrently (cFOLFOXIRI-BEV) or sequentially (sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, FOLFOX-BEV alternating with FOLFIRI-BEV), versus FOLFOX-BEV for mCRC.
PATIENTS AND METHODS
Patients with previously untreated mCRC (
RESULTS
ORR was 72.0%, 72.8%, and 62.1% and median PFS was 11.9, 11.4, and 9.5 months with cFOLFOXIRI-BEV, sFOLFOXIRI-BEV, and FOLFOX-BEV, respectively. OS was similar between arms. ORR between cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and FOLFOX-BEV did not significantly differ (
CONCLUSION
cFOLFOXIRI-BEV and sFOLFOXIRI-BEV were well tolerated with numerically improved ORR, PFS, and liver resection rates versus FOLFOX-BEV, supporting triplet chemotherapy plus BEV as a first-line treatment option for mCRC

Identifiants

pubmed: 30552157
pii: theoncologist.2018-0344
doi: 10.1634/theoncologist.2018-0344
pmc: PMC6656450
doi:

Substances chimiques

Oxaliplatin 04ZR38536J
Bevacizumab 2S9ZZM9Q9V
Irinotecan 7673326042
Leucovorin Q573I9DVLP
Fluorouracil U3P01618RT

Banques de données

ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT01765582']

Types de publication

Clinical Trial, Phase II Comparative Study Journal Article Multicenter Study Randomized Controlled Trial Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

921-932

Subventions

Organisme : NCATS NIH HHS
ID : UL1 TR001863
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

© AlphaMed Press 2018.

Déclaration de conflit d'intérêts

Disclosures of potential conflicts of interest may be found at the end of this article.

Références

Lancet. 2000 Mar 25;355(9209):1041-7
pubmed: 10744089
J Clin Oncol. 2000 Aug;18(16):2938-47
pubmed: 10944126
N Engl J Med. 2000 Sep 28;343(13):905-14
pubmed: 11006366
N Engl J Med. 2004 Jun 3;350(23):2335-42
pubmed: 15175435
J Clin Oncol. 2007 May 1;25(13):1670-6
pubmed: 17470860
Oncology. 2007;72(1-2):4-9
pubmed: 17971679
J Clin Oncol. 2008 Apr 20;26(12):2013-9
pubmed: 18421054
Lancet Oncol. 2010 Sep;11(9):845-52
pubmed: 20702138
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2011 Jan 5;103(1):21-30
pubmed: 21123833
Science. 2013 Mar 29;339(6127):1546-58
pubmed: 23539594
J Chemother. 2013 Apr;25(2):104-11
pubmed: 23684358
Nat Med. 2014 May;20(5):548-54
pubmed: 24705333
N Engl J Med. 2014 Oct 23;371(17):1609-18
pubmed: 25337750
Ann Oncol. 2015 Apr;26(4):702-8
pubmed: 25538173
J Natl Cancer Inst. 2015 Feb 24;107(3):null
pubmed: 25713148
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Oct;16(13):1306-15
pubmed: 26338525
Ann Oncol. 2016 May;27(5):843-9
pubmed: 26861604
Nat Biotechnol. 2016 May;34(5):547-555
pubmed: 27018799
Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2016;12:141-150
pubmed: 27340376
JAMA Oncol. 2017 Jul 13;3(7):e170278
pubmed: 28542671
BMC Cancer. 2017 Jun 9;17(1):408
pubmed: 28599628

Auteurs

Herbert I Hurwitz (HI)

Duke University Medical Center, Durham, North Carolina, USA hurwitz.herbert@gene.com.

Benjamin R Tan (BR)

Washington University School of Medicine, Saint Louis, Missouri, USA.

James A Reeves (JA)

Florida Cancer Specialists - South Region, Ft. Myers, Florida, USA.

Henry Xiong (H)

The Center for Cancer and Blood Disorders, Fort Worth, Texas, USA.

Brad Somer (B)

West Clinic, Memphis, Tennessee, USA.

Heinz-Josef Lenz (HJ)

USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, California, USA.

Howard S Hochster (HS)

Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA.

Frank Scappaticci (F)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.

John F Palma (JF)

Roche Sequencing Solutions, Pleasanton California, USA.

Richard Price (R)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.

John J Lee (JJ)

Roche Sequencing Solutions, Pleasanton California, USA.

Alan Nicholas (A)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.

Nicolas Sommer (N)

Genentech, Inc., South San Francisco, California, USA.

Johanna Bendell (J)

Sarah Cannon Research Institute/Tennessee Oncology, Nashville, Tennessee, USA.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH