Bundled Payment Models in Spine Surgery: Current Challenges and Opportunities, a Systematic Review.

Bundled payment Cervical Challenges Cost variation Degenerative spine surgery Episodes of care Lumbar Opportunities Payment variation Spine surgery

Journal

World neurosurgery
ISSN: 1878-8769
Titre abrégé: World Neurosurg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101528275

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Historique:
received: 09 10 2018
revised: 01 12 2018
accepted: 03 12 2018
pubmed: 16 12 2018
medline: 5 4 2019
entrez: 16 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Bundled payments offer a lump sum for management of particular conditions over a specified period that has the potential to reduce health care payments. In addition, bundled payments represent a shift toward patient-centered reimbursement, which has the upside of improved care coordination among providers and may lead to improved outcomes. To review the challenges and sources of payment variation and opportunities for restructuring bundled payments plans in the context of spine surgery. We reviewed episodes of care over the past 10 years. We completed a search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design) model in PubMed and Ovid databases to identify studies that met our search criteria. Ten studies met the search criteria, which were retrospective in design. The primary recipient of reimbursement was the hospital associated with the index procedure (59.7%-77% of the bundled payment), followed by surgeon reimbursement (12.8%-14%) and post-acute care rehabilitation (3.6%-7.3%). On average, the index hospitalization was $32,467, ranging from $11,880 to $107,642, depending on number of levels fused, complications, and malignancy. Readmission was shown to increase the 90-day payment by 50%-200% for uncomplicated fusion. The implementation of spine surgery in bundled payment models offers opportunity for health care cost reduction. Patient heterogeneity, complications, and index hospitalization pricing are among factors that contribute to the challenge of payment variation. Development of standard care pathways, multidisciplinary coordination between inpatient and outpatient postoperative care, and empowerment of patients are also key elements of progress in the evolution of bundled payments in spine surgery. We anticipate more individualized risk-adjusted prediction models of payment for spine surgery, contributing to more manageable variation in payment and favorable models of bundled payments for payers and providers.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND BACKGROUND
Bundled payments offer a lump sum for management of particular conditions over a specified period that has the potential to reduce health care payments. In addition, bundled payments represent a shift toward patient-centered reimbursement, which has the upside of improved care coordination among providers and may lead to improved outcomes.
OBJECTIVE OBJECTIVE
To review the challenges and sources of payment variation and opportunities for restructuring bundled payments plans in the context of spine surgery.
METHODS METHODS
We reviewed episodes of care over the past 10 years. We completed a search using PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) guidelines and the PICOS (Participants, Intervention, Comparison, Outcomes, Study Design) model in PubMed and Ovid databases to identify studies that met our search criteria.
RESULTS RESULTS
Ten studies met the search criteria, which were retrospective in design. The primary recipient of reimbursement was the hospital associated with the index procedure (59.7%-77% of the bundled payment), followed by surgeon reimbursement (12.8%-14%) and post-acute care rehabilitation (3.6%-7.3%). On average, the index hospitalization was $32,467, ranging from $11,880 to $107,642, depending on number of levels fused, complications, and malignancy. Readmission was shown to increase the 90-day payment by 50%-200% for uncomplicated fusion.
CONCLUSIONS CONCLUSIONS
The implementation of spine surgery in bundled payment models offers opportunity for health care cost reduction. Patient heterogeneity, complications, and index hospitalization pricing are among factors that contribute to the challenge of payment variation. Development of standard care pathways, multidisciplinary coordination between inpatient and outpatient postoperative care, and empowerment of patients are also key elements of progress in the evolution of bundled payments in spine surgery. We anticipate more individualized risk-adjusted prediction models of payment for spine surgery, contributing to more manageable variation in payment and favorable models of bundled payments for payers and providers.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30553071
pii: S1878-8750(18)32800-6
doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2018.12.001
pii:
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article Systematic Review

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

177-183

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018. Published by Elsevier Inc.

Auteurs

Nicholas Dietz (N)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Mayur Sharma (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Ahmad Alhourani (A)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Beatrice Ugiliweneza (B)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Dengzhi Wang (D)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA.

Miriam A Nuño (MA)

Department of Public Health Sciences, Division of Biostatistics, University of California Davis, Davis, California, USA.

Doniel Drazin (D)

Evergreen Hospital Neuroscience Institute, Kirkland, Washington, USA.

Maxwell Boakye (M)

Department of Neurosurgery, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky, USA. Electronic address: Maxwell.boakye@ulp.org.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH