Administrative healthcare data applied to fracture risk assessment.
Administrative data
FRAX
Fracture risk
Osteoporosis
Risk assessment
Journal
Osteoporosis international : a journal established as result of cooperation between the European Foundation for Osteoporosis and the National Osteoporosis Foundation of the USA
ISSN: 1433-2965
Titre abrégé: Osteoporos Int
Pays: England
ID NLM: 9100105
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
10
08
2018
accepted:
12
11
2018
pubmed:
17
12
2018
medline:
20
8
2019
entrez:
17
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Fracture risk scores generated from population-based administrative healthcare data showed comparable or better discrimination than the Fracture Risk Assessment Tool (FRAX) scores computed without bone mineral density for predicting incident major osteoporotic fracture. Administrative data may be useful to identify individuals at high fracture risk at the population level. To evaluate the discrimination of fracture risk scores defined using inputs available from administrative data for predicting incident major osteoporotic fracture (MOF) and hip fracture (HF) alone. Using the Manitoba Bone Mineral Density (BMD) Database (1997-2013), we identified 61,041 individuals aged 50 years or older with healthcare coverage following their first BMD test. We calculated two-modified FRAX)scores based on administrative data: FRAX-A and FRAX-A During a mean of 7 years of follow-up, we identified 5306 (8.7%) incident MOF and 1532 (2.5%) incident HF. The c-statistic for MOF associated with FRAX-A was lower than FRAX (BMD) (0.655 vs 0.675; P < 0.05) and comparable to FRAX (no-BMD) (0.654; P = 0.07). The c-statistic for MOF using FRAX-A FRAX-A and FRAX-A
Identifiants
pubmed: 30554259
doi: 10.1007/s00198-018-4780-6
pii: 10.1007/s00198-018-4780-6
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Pagination
565-571Références
Osteoporos Int. 2000;11(10):897-904
pubmed: 11199195
Osteoporos Int. 2001;12(4):271-8
pubmed: 11420776
J Clin Densitom. 2003 Fall;6(3):275-82
pubmed: 14514998
Osteoporos Int. 2005 Jun;16(6):581-9
pubmed: 15616758
J Clin Densitom. 2005 Spring;8(1):25-30
pubmed: 15722584
Osteoporos Int. 2006 Dec;17(12):1726-33
pubmed: 16983459
Bone. 2009 May;44(5):734-43
pubmed: 19195497
J Bone Miner Res. 2010 Nov;25(11):2350-8
pubmed: 20499367
Osteoporos Int. 2011 Mar;22(3):829-37
pubmed: 21161508
BMC Public Health. 2012 May 18;12:301
pubmed: 22537071
Lifetime Data Anal. 2013 Jan;19(1):33-58
pubmed: 23010807
Osteoporos Int. 2013 Apr;24(4):1185-93
pubmed: 23179575
Arch Osteoporos. 2013;8:143
pubmed: 23740086
PLoS One. 2013 Dec 30;8(12):e83436
pubmed: 24386199
Climacteric. 2015;18 Suppl 2:2-9
pubmed: 26489076
J Bone Miner Res. 2016 Sep;31(9):1753-9
pubmed: 27061748
Osteoporos Int. 2017 Dec;28(12):3389-3399
pubmed: 28875257
Osteoporos Int. 2018 Mar;29(3):567-578
pubmed: 29218381
Lancet. 2018 Feb 24;391(10122):741-747
pubmed: 29254858
Bone. 2018 May;110:170-176
pubmed: 29421456
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 May;33(5):845-851
pubmed: 29470854
J Bone Miner Res. 2018 Nov;33(11):1967-1979
pubmed: 29924428
Biometrics. 1988 Sep;44(3):837-45
pubmed: 3203132