Cost-effectiveness of an adherence-enhancing intervention for gout based on real-world data.
Adult
Aged
Allopurinol
/ adverse effects
Cost of Illness
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Decision Trees
Drug Costs
Female
Gout
/ diagnosis
Gout Suppressants
/ adverse effects
Health Care Costs
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Male
Medication Adherence
Middle Aged
Models, Economic
Patient Education as Topic
/ economics
Program Evaluation
Quality-Adjusted Life Years
Retrospective Studies
Singapore
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
allopurinol
cost-effectiveness analysis
electronic medical records
gout
medication adherence
quality-adjusted life year
Journal
International journal of rheumatic diseases
ISSN: 1756-185X
Titre abrégé: Int J Rheum Dis
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101474930
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
05
04
2018
revised:
08
10
2018
accepted:
23
10
2018
pubmed:
18
12
2018
medline:
4
9
2019
entrez:
18
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Medication non-adherence influences outcomes of therapies for chronic diseases. Allopurinol is a cornerstone therapy for patients with gout; however, non-adherence to allopurinol is prevalent in Singapore and limits its effectiveness. Between 2008-2010, an adherence-enhancing program was implemented at the rheumatology division of a public tertiary hospital. The cost-effectiveness of this program has not been fully evaluated. With healthcare resources being finite, the value of investing in adherence-enhancing interventions should be ascertained. This study aims to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of this adherence-enhancing program to inform optimal resource allocation toward better gout management. Adopting a real-world data approach, we utilized patient clinical and financial records generated in their course of routine care. Intervention and control groups were identified in a standing database and matched on nine risk factors through propensity score matching. Cost and effect data were followed through 1-2 years. A decision tree was developed in TreeAge using a societal perspective. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess parameter uncertainty. At an assumed willingness-to-pay threshold of $50 000 USD ($70 000 SGD) per quality-adjusted life year (QALY), the intervention had an 85% probability of being cost-effective compared to routine care. The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was $12 866 USD per QALY for the base case and ranged from $4 139 to $21 593 USD per QALY in sensitivity analyses. The intervention is cost-effective in the short-term, although its long-term cost-effectiveness remains to be evaluated.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30556300
doi: 10.1111/1756-185X.13446
pmc: PMC6590285
doi:
Substances chimiques
Gout Suppressants
0
Allopurinol
63CZ7GJN5I
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
545-554Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. International Journal of Rheumatic Diseases published by Asia Pacific League of Associations for Rheumatology and John Wiley & Sons Australia, Ltd.
Références
BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Jun 14;12:98
pubmed: 22510235
Rheumatology (Oxford). 2009 May;48(5):582-6
pubmed: 19307257
Singapore Med J. 2016 Aug;57(8):412-4
pubmed: 27549096
Ann Rheum Dis. 2015 Jul;74(7):1368-72
pubmed: 24665118
Acta Reumatol Port. 2010 Oct-Dec;35(5):466-74
pubmed: 21245815
Pharmacoeconomics. 2013 Dec;31(12):1155-68
pubmed: 24222477
Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jan 15;179(2):226-35
pubmed: 24114655
Nat Rev Rheumatol. 2015 Nov;11(11):649-62
pubmed: 26150127
N Engl J Med. 1966 Mar 3;274(9):481-6
pubmed: 5904287
Pharmacotherapy. 2008 Apr;28(4):437-43
pubmed: 18363527
J Acquir Immune Defic Syndr. 2006 Dec 1;43 Suppl 1:S113-8
pubmed: 17133193
Lancet. 2010 Jan 23;375(9711):318-28
pubmed: 19692116
Arthritis Res Ther. 2009;11(2):R46
pubmed: 19327147
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2013 Jul 10;7:675-82
pubmed: 23874088
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2011 Dec;11(6):673-5
pubmed: 22098282
Semin Arthritis Rheum. 2017 Apr;46(5):601-608
pubmed: 27931979
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Dec 02;10:2449-2457
pubmed: 27980395
Scand J Rheumatol. 2012;41(6):450-7
pubmed: 22839705
Ann Rheum Dis. 2012 Jun;71(6):924-8
pubmed: 22172492
Eur J Health Econ. 2014 Jun;15(5):453-63
pubmed: 23719971
Patient Prefer Adherence. 2016 Sep 29;10:1979-1989
pubmed: 27729776
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2016;16(1):67-84
pubmed: 26732615
Res Theory Nurs Pract. 2002 Fall;16(3):179-92
pubmed: 12472293
J Med Econ. 2016;19(3):265-76
pubmed: 26535593
Curr Opin Rheumatol. 2015 Mar;27(2):134-8
pubmed: 25633242
J Behav Med. 2008 Dec;31(6):489-97
pubmed: 18780175
Ann Rheum Dis. 2017 Jan;76(1):29-42
pubmed: 27457514
Arthritis Res Ther. 2014 Mar 29;16(2):R82
pubmed: 24678765
J Clin Nurs. 2018 Jan;27(1-2):e213-e222
pubmed: 28618105
Ann Intern Med. 2014 Nov 4;161(9):617-26
pubmed: 25364883
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 20;(11):CD000011
pubmed: 25412402
Int J Rheum Dis. 2019 Apr;22(4):545-554
pubmed: 30556300
Am J Epidemiol. 2010 Nov 1;172(9):1092-7
pubmed: 20802241
Drugs. 2006;66(12):1547-63
pubmed: 16956303
Expert Rev Pharmacoecon Outcomes Res. 2008 Apr;8(2):165-78
pubmed: 20528406
Pharmacogenomics. 2015 Nov;16(16):1781-93
pubmed: 26554739
Med Care. 1999 Dec;37(12):1199-206
pubmed: 10599601
Ann Pharmacother. 2005 Mar;39(3):508-15
pubmed: 15657115
N Engl J Med. 2005 Aug 4;353(5):487-97
pubmed: 16079372