An alternative approach to relapse analysis: Using Monte Carlo methods and proportional rates of response.


Journal

Journal of the experimental analysis of behavior
ISSN: 1938-3711
Titre abrégé: J Exp Anal Behav
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 0203727

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
03 2019
Historique:
received: 07 09 2018
accepted: 15 11 2018
pubmed: 18 12 2018
medline: 25 7 2020
entrez: 18 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Relapse is the recovery of a previously suppressed response. Animal models have been useful in examining the mechanisms underlying relapse (e.g., reinstatement, renewal, reacquisition, resurgence). However, there are several challenges to analyzing relapse data using traditional approaches. For example, null hypothesis significance testing is commonly used to determine whether relapse has occurred. However, this method requires several a priori assumptions about the data, as well as a large sample size for between-subjects comparisons or repeated testing for within-subjects comparisons. Monte Carlo methods may represent an improved analytic technique, because these methods require no prior assumptions, permit smaller sample sizes, and can be tailored to account for all of the data from an experiment instead of some limited set. In the present study, we conducted reanalyses of three studies of relapse (Berry, Sweeney, & Odum, ; Galizio et al., ; Odum & Shahan, ) using Monte Carlo techniques to determine if relapse occurred and if there were differences in rate of response based on relevant independent variables (such as group membership or schedule of reinforcement). These reanalyses supported the previous findings. Finally, we provide general recommendations for using Monte Carlo methods in studies of relapse.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30556581
doi: 10.1002/jeab.489
doi:

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

289-308

Informations de copyright

© 2018 Society for the Experimental Analysis of Behavior.

Auteurs

Jonathan E Friedel (JE)

National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health.

Ann Galizio (A)

Utah State University.

Meredith S Berry (MS)

University of Florida.

Mary M Sweeney (MM)

Behavioral Pharmacology Research Unit, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.

Amy L Odum (AL)

Utah State University.

Articles similaires

Robotic Surgical Procedures Animals Humans Telemedicine Models, Animal

Odour generalisation and detection dog training.

Lyn Caldicott, Thomas W Pike, Helen E Zulch et al.
1.00
Animals Odorants Dogs Generalization, Psychological Smell
Animals TOR Serine-Threonine Kinases Colorectal Neoplasms Colitis Mice
Animals Tail Swine Behavior, Animal Animal Husbandry

Classifications MeSH