Principles and procedures for handling out-of-domain and indeterminate results as part of ICH M7 recommended (Q)SAR analyses.
Journal
Regulatory toxicology and pharmacology : RTP
ISSN: 1096-0295
Titre abrégé: Regul Toxicol Pharmacol
Pays: Netherlands
ID NLM: 8214983
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
14
09
2018
revised:
10
12
2018
accepted:
14
12
2018
pubmed:
19
12
2018
medline:
23
2
2019
entrez:
19
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The International Council for Harmonization (ICH) M7 guideline describes a hazard assessment process for impurities that have the potential to be present in a drug substance or drug product. In the absence of adequate experimental bacterial mutagenicity data, (Q)SAR analysis may be used as a test to predict impurities' DNA reactive (mutagenic) potential. However, in certain situations, (Q)SAR software is unable to generate a positive or negative prediction either because of conflicting information or because the impurity is outside the applicability domain of the model. Such results present challenges in generating an overall mutagenicity prediction and highlight the importance of performing a thorough expert review. The following paper reviews pharmaceutical and regulatory experiences handling such situations. The paper also presents an analysis of proprietary data to help understand the likelihood of misclassifying a mutagenic impurity as non-mutagenic based on different combinations of (Q)SAR results. This information may be taken into consideration when supporting the (Q)SAR results with an expert review, especially when out-of-domain results are generated during a (Q)SAR evaluation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30562600
pii: S0273-2300(18)30314-3
doi: 10.1016/j.yrtph.2018.12.007
pmc: PMC7500704
mid: NIHMS1517744
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Mutagens
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
53-64Subventions
Organisme : NIEHS NIH HHS
ID : R44 ES026909
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Références
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2018 Jul;96:1-17
pubmed: 29678766
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Mar;71(2):295-300
pubmed: 25545315
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Jul;72(2):335-49
pubmed: 25980641
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Jun;77:13-24
pubmed: 26877192
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2012 Apr;62(3):449-55
pubmed: 22321701
Mutat Res. 1984 Jul;134(1):1-47
pubmed: 6379432
ALTEX. 2016;33(2):149-66
pubmed: 26863606
J Chem Inf Model. 2012 Oct 22;52(10):2609-18
pubmed: 22947043
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2016 Nov;27(11):893-909
pubmed: 27827546
Mol Inform. 2010 Jan 12;29(1-2):97-110
pubmed: 27463852
Adv Exp Med Biol. 2016;856:165-187
pubmed: 27671722
J Chem Inf Model. 2014 May 27;54(5):1500-11
pubmed: 24821140
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Apr;71(3):388-97
pubmed: 25656493
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2015 Oct;73(1):367-77
pubmed: 26248005
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2006 Apr;44(3):198-211
pubmed: 16412543
Natl Toxicol Program Tech Rep Ser. 1991 Sep;389:1-165
pubmed: 12637970
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2016 Apr;76:79-86
pubmed: 26785392
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2013 Oct;67(1):39-52
pubmed: 23669331
Altern Lab Anim. 2005 Apr;33(2):155-73
pubmed: 16180989
Ther Innov Regul Sci. 2018 Mar;52(2):244-255
pubmed: 29568713