Chromatographic separation of R-(-)/S-(+)-enantiomers of amphetamine and methamphetamine: differentiation between single methamphetamine consumption and co-consumption with amphetamine using enantioselective quantitative LC-MS/MS analysis.
Amphetamine
Co-consumption
Enantiomer ratio
Methamphetamine
Quantification
Journal
International journal of legal medicine
ISSN: 1437-1596
Titre abrégé: Int J Legal Med
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 9101456
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Mar 2019
Mar 2019
Historique:
received:
15
08
2018
accepted:
04
12
2018
pubmed:
20
12
2018
medline:
4
4
2019
entrez:
20
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The differentiation between single methamphetamine consumption and co-consumption with amphetamine is difficult, however possible by enantioselective analysis due to different preferred synthesis pathways of both substances. We quantified (R)-(-) and (S)-(+)-enantiomers of methamphetamine and amphetamine by a fast liquid chromatographic tandem-mass spectrometric method using a Lux® 3-μm AMP 150 × 3.0 mm analytical column after simple protein precipitation with methanol. Method validation for quantitative detection showed limits of quantification < 5 ng/mL, linearity in a range between 5 and 300 ng/mL and bias and imprecision data < 15%. Overall, 134 plasma samples of police cases from the German regions of Franconia and Northrhine-Westphalia were analyzed for the enantiomers of methamphetamine and amphetamine. In 28 cases, the intake of racemic illicit amphetamine could be demonstrated; (R)-(-) / (S)-(+)-amphetamine concentration ratios in these cases were between 1.38 and 4.50 with most of the ratios being < 2.0. These ratios were compared to a subgroup of 25 consumers with a co-consumption of (S)-(+)-methamphetamine and racemic amphetamine detected by the qualitative proof of (R)-(-)-amphetamine but also by (R)-(-) / (S)-(+)-amphetamine concentration ratios (< 1 in 11 of 25 cases). Within our collective of 106 plasma samples after methamphetamine use, 25 samples showed co-consumption with amphetamine which shows that co-consumption of both stimulants is not a rare scenario. Furthermore, we could show that if non-stereoselective methods are used and the concentration ratio of total methamphetamine/total amphetamine is determined, a reliable estimation of co-consumption is not possible.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30564915
doi: 10.1007/s00414-018-1979-1
pii: 10.1007/s00414-018-1979-1
doi:
Substances chimiques
Central Nervous System Stimulants
0
Methamphetamine
44RAL3456C
Amphetamine
CK833KGX7E
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
467-473Références
Clin Chem. 2002 Sep;48(9):1472-85
pubmed: 12194924
Forensic Sci Int. 2007 Jan 17;165(2-3):216-24
pubmed: 16781833
Forensic Sci Rev. 1989 Jun;1(1):1-11
pubmed: 26266521
Drug Metab Dispos. 1993 Jul-Aug;21(4):717-23
pubmed: 8104133
J Anal Toxicol. 1995 Oct;19(6):392-8
pubmed: 8926733
Clin Chim Acta. 1971 Sep;34(2):333-44
pubmed: 5113570
Clin Chem. 2002 Oct;48(10):1703-14
pubmed: 12324487
J Anal Toxicol. 2000 Apr;24(3):223-7
pubmed: 10774542
Biochem J. 1972 Aug;129(1):11-22
pubmed: 4646771
Biochem Pharmacol. 1967 Jul 7;16(7):1374-7
pubmed: 6053603
J Anal Toxicol. 2012 Nov-Dec;36(9):634-7
pubmed: 23034928
Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2006 Oct;80(4):403-20
pubmed: 17015058
J Anal Toxicol. 2002 Oct;26(7):430-7
pubmed: 12422997
Ann Clin Biochem. 1996 Jan;33 ( Pt 1):50-4
pubmed: 8929067
J Anal Toxicol. 1993 Oct;17(6):321-6
pubmed: 8271777
Forensic Sci Int. 1998 Aug 31;96(1):61-70
pubmed: 9800366
Clin Chem. 2003 Jan;49(1):121-32
pubmed: 12507968
Int J Legal Med. 2017 Sep;131(5):1253-1260
pubmed: 28509940
Rapid Commun Mass Spectrom. 2003;17(6):569-75
pubmed: 12621619
Forensic Sci Int. 2018 Oct;291:138-143
pubmed: 30199817