Factors Associated With Outcomes of Patients With Primary Sclerosing Cholangitis and Development and Validation of a Risk Scoring System.
Journal
Hepatology (Baltimore, Md.)
ISSN: 1527-3350
Titre abrégé: Hepatology
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8302946
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
05 2019
05 2019
Historique:
received:
20
01
2018
accepted:
02
12
2018
pubmed:
20
12
2018
medline:
17
6
2020
entrez:
20
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
We sought to identify factors that are predictive of liver transplantation or death in patients with primary sclerosing cholangitis (PSC), and to develop and validate a contemporaneous risk score for use in a real-world clinical setting. Analyzing data from 1,001 patients recruited to the UK-PSC research cohort, we evaluated clinical variables for their association with 2-year and 10-year outcome through Cox-proportional hazards and C-statistic analyses. We generated risk scores for short-term and long-term outcome prediction, validating their use in two independent cohorts totaling 451 patients. Thirty-six percent of the derivation cohort were transplanted or died over a cumulative follow-up of 7,904 years. Serum alkaline phosphatase of at least 2.4 × upper limit of normal at 1 year after diagnosis was predictive of 10-year outcome (hazard ratio [HR] = 3.05; C = 0.63; median transplant-free survival 63 versus 108 months; P < 0.0001), as was the presence of extrahepatic biliary disease (HR = 1.45; P = 0.01). We developed two risk scoring systems based on age, values of bilirubin, alkaline phosphatase, albumin, platelets, presence of extrahepatic biliary disease, and variceal hemorrhage, which predicted 2-year and 10-year outcomes with good discrimination (C statistic = 0.81 and 0.80, respectively). Both UK-PSC risk scores were well-validated in our external cohort and outperformed the Mayo Clinic and aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI) scores (C statistic = 0.75 and 0.63, respectively). Although heterozygosity for the previously validated human leukocyte antigen (HLA)-DR*03:01 risk allele predicted increased risk of adverse outcome (HR = 1.33; P = 0.001), its addition did not improve the predictive accuracy of the UK-PSC risk scores. Conclusion: Our analyses, based on a detailed clinical evaluation of a large representative cohort of participants with PSC, furthers our understanding of clinical risk markers and reports the development and validation of a real-world scoring system to identify those patients most likely to die or require liver transplantation.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30566748
doi: 10.1002/hep.30479
pmc: PMC6519245
doi:
Substances chimiques
HLA Antigens
0
Alkaline Phosphatase
EC 3.1.3.1
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
2120-2135Subventions
Organisme : Norwegian PSC Research Center
Pays : International
Organisme : Addenbrooke's Charitable Trust, Cambridge University Hospitals
Pays : International
Organisme : National Institute of Health Research
Pays : International
Organisme : Isaac Newton Trust
Pays : International
Organisme : Health Research
Pays : International
Organisme : Department of Health
Pays : United Kingdom
Commentaires et corrections
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Type : CommentIn
Informations de copyright
© 2018 The Authors. Hepatology published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. on behalf of American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
Références
Mayo Clin Proc. 2000 Jul;75(7):688-94
pubmed: 10907383
J Hepatol. 2002 Mar;36(3):321-7
pubmed: 11867174
Gut. 2002 Nov;51(5):731-5
pubmed: 12377815
Gastroenterology. 1992 Dec;103(6):1893-901
pubmed: 1451982
Am J Epidemiol. 2007 Mar 15;165(6):710-8
pubmed: 17182981
Gastroenterology. 1991 Jun;100(6):1710-7
pubmed: 1850376
J Hepatol. 2009 Jan;50(1):158-64
pubmed: 19012991
Gastroenterology. 2010 Mar;138(3):1102-11
pubmed: 19944697
Hepatology. 2010 Feb;51(2):660-78
pubmed: 20101749
Am J Ther. 2011 May;18(3):198-205
pubmed: 20228674
BMC Med. 2010 Mar 30;8:20
pubmed: 20353578
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2011 Mar;18(2):154-61
pubmed: 20740366
Dig Liver Dis. 2011 Apr;43(4):309-13
pubmed: 21251891
Hepatology. 2011 Nov;54(5):1842-52
pubmed: 21793028
J Hepatol. 2013 Feb;58(2):329-34
pubmed: 23085647
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Jul;11(7):841-6
pubmed: 23353641
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2013 Mar 06;13:33
pubmed: 23496923
Nat Genet. 2013 Jun;45(6):670-5
pubmed: 23603763
Hepatology. 2013 Dec;58(6):2045-55
pubmed: 23775876
Gastroenterology. 2014 Apr;146(4):970-9; quiz e15-6
pubmed: 24389304
Ann Hepatol. 2014 Jul-Aug;13(4):316-26
pubmed: 24927602
Gastroenterology. 2014 Dec;147(6):1338-49.e5; quiz e15
pubmed: 25160979
Hepatology. 2015 Jul;62(1):188-97
pubmed: 25833813
Ann Intern Med. 2015 May 19;162(10):735-6
pubmed: 25984857
Hepatology. 2016 Mar;63(3):930-50
pubmed: 26223498
Hepatology. 2016 Feb;63(2):644-59
pubmed: 26290473
Hepatology. 1989 Oct;10(4):430-6
pubmed: 2777204
Nat Genet. 2017 Feb;49(2):269-273
pubmed: 27992413
Gastroenterology. 2017 Jun;152(8):1975-1984.e8
pubmed: 28274849
Gut. 2018 Oct;67(10):1864-1869
pubmed: 28739581
Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Feb;16(2):278-287.e7
pubmed: 28993258
Hepatology. 1995 Nov;22(5):1404-8
pubmed: 7590655
Gut. 1996 Apr;38(4):610-5
pubmed: 8707097