Accuracy and revision rate of intraoperative computed tomography point-to-point navigation for lateral mass and pedicle screw placement: 11-year single-center experience in 1054 patients.
Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Feasibility Studies
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Patient Safety
Pedicle Screws
/ adverse effects
Postoperative Complications
/ epidemiology
Reoperation
Retrospective Studies
Spinal Diseases
/ diagnostic imaging
Surgery, Computer-Assisted
/ adverse effects
Tomography, X-Ray Computed
Young Adult
Computer-assisted spinal surgery
Intraoperative CT
Point-to-point navigation
Spinal instrumentation
Journal
Neurosurgical review
ISSN: 1437-2320
Titre abrégé: Neurosurg Rev
Pays: Germany
ID NLM: 7908181
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Dec 2019
Dec 2019
Historique:
received:
29
08
2018
accepted:
06
12
2018
revised:
07
11
2018
pubmed:
21
12
2018
medline:
6
2
2020
entrez:
21
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
High accuracy in intraoperative computed tomography (iCT) navigation utilizing an intraoperatively acquired dataset for screw placement in the spine has been reported in the literature. To further improve the accuracy and counteract any intraoperative movement of predefined registration points, we introduce an iCT point-to-point navigation, where marker screws are inserted intraoperatively to increase patient safety. In all, 1054 patients who underwent iCT point-to-point navigation for lateral mass and pedicle screw placement were retrospectively analyzed between 09/2005 and 09/2016. Implant-related complications such as screw misplacement, screw loosening, and revision rate were determined. Furthermore, we investigated the rate of complications and the clinical outcome. In total, 6059 screws were inserted in 1054 patients. There were 553 (52.5%) female and 501 (47.5%) male patients. Average age was 63.5 years, mean BMI 27.5 (SD 13.9). Here, 1427 (23.5%) screws were inserted in the cervical, 995 (16.4%) in the thoracic, 3167 (52.3%) in the lumbar, and 470 (7.8%) in the sacral spine. Eight patients required a revision procedure for screw misplacement (0.8%). Total screw misplacement rate was 0.3% (16/6059). With the use of reference markers in iCT-based, spinal, point-to-point navigation, we achieved a high accuracy of screw placement with a low revision rate (0.8%) and a total screw misplacement rate of 0.3%.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30569212
doi: 10.1007/s10143-018-01067-z
pii: 10.1007/s10143-018-01067-z
doi:
Types de publication
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
895-905Références
J Neurosurg Spine. 2012 Aug;17(2):113-22
pubmed: 22724594
J Spinal Disord. 1995 Dec;8(6):464-73
pubmed: 8605420
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2009 Oct;22(7):502-6
pubmed: 20075813
IEEE Trans Med Imaging. 2015 Aug;34(8):1738-46
pubmed: 25594965
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 May 1;22(9):977-82
pubmed: 9152447
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2014 Jun 1;39(13):1004-9
pubmed: 24732833
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2011 Nov 15;36(24):2094-8
pubmed: 21304425
Spine J. 2016 Jan 1;16(1):23-31
pubmed: 26456854
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jan;19(1):91-5
pubmed: 19882179
Open Orthop J. 2010 Aug 06;4:228-33
pubmed: 21249166
Acta Neurochir (Wien). 2003 Nov;145(11):949-54; discussion 954-5
pubmed: 14628199
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2004 Sep 1;29(17):1938-44
pubmed: 15534420
Neurosurgery. 2011 Oct;69(4):782-95; discussion 795
pubmed: 21552171
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2010 May 15;35(11):E465-70
pubmed: 20473117
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2008 Jul 1;33(15):E501-7
pubmed: 18594448
Spine J. 2015 Mar 1;15(3):467-76
pubmed: 25315133
Eur Spine J. 2012 Feb;21(2):247-55
pubmed: 21901328
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2010 Dec;23(8):e70-4
pubmed: 20924292
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1997 Feb 15;22(4):452-8
pubmed: 9055375
Eur Spine J. 2010 Jan;19(1):25-45
pubmed: 19763640
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jun;25(6):1729-37
pubmed: 25967559
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2018 Mar 1;43(5):370-377
pubmed: 28368989
Neurosurgery. 2009 May;64(5 Suppl 2):231-9; discussion 239-40
pubmed: 19404103
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1996 Jun 1;21(11):1320-4
pubmed: 8725923
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2009 Dec 15;34(26):2919-26
pubmed: 20010400
Global Spine J. 2017 Feb;7(1):83-94
pubmed: 28451513
Eur Spine J. 2010 May;19(5):821-7
pubmed: 20135332
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2001 Nov 1;26(21):2340-6
pubmed: 11679819
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Feb 1;32(3):E111-20
pubmed: 17268254
Medicine (Baltimore). 2016 May;95(18):e3581
pubmed: 27149486
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1990 Jan;15(1):11-4
pubmed: 2326693
Eur Spine J. 2011 Jun;20(6):846-59
pubmed: 20862593
World Neurosurg. 2018 Jan;109:e24-e32
pubmed: 28951183
Eur Spine J. 2013 Mar;22(3):654-60
pubmed: 23001415
J Neurotrauma. 2017 Dec 15;34(24):3326-3335
pubmed: 28627291
J Neurosurg Spine. 2017 Sep;27(3):268-275
pubmed: 28598291
Neurosurg Focus. 2010 Mar;28(3):E11
pubmed: 20192656
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Oct;82(10):1458-76
pubmed: 11057475
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2005 Dec 15;30(24):2800-5
pubmed: 16371908
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jan 15;32(2):E56-64
pubmed: 17224800
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986 Feb;(203):7-17
pubmed: 3955999
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2003 Feb 15;28(4):402-13
pubmed: 12590219
Int Orthop. 2008 Aug;32(4):517-21
pubmed: 17410363
Orthopedics. 2012 Aug 1;35(8):e1221-4
pubmed: 22868609
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1991 Mar;16(3 Suppl):S84-99
pubmed: 2028346
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Mar 1;25(5):606-14
pubmed: 10749638
Neurosurgery. 2002 Jan;50(1):222-3; discussion 223-4
pubmed: 11844256
Neurosurg Focus. 2011 Oct;31(4):E8
pubmed: 21961871
Neurosurgery. 2011 Sep;69(1 Suppl Operative):ons14-9; discussion ons19
pubmed: 21471846
J Spinal Disord Tech. 2012 Dec 3;26(5):E183-E187
pubmed: 23222100
Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2000 Jul 1;25(13):1655-67
pubmed: 10870141