Isometric resistance training increases strength and alters histopathology of dystrophin-deficient mouse skeletal muscle.
Adaptation, Physiological
Animals
Disease Models, Animal
Dystrophin
/ deficiency
Fibrosis
Isometric Contraction
Male
Mice, Inbred mdx
Muscle Strength
Muscle, Skeletal
/ metabolism
Muscular Dystrophy, Duchenne
/ metabolism
Mutation, Missense
Recovery of Function
Resistance Training
Satellite Cells, Skeletal Muscle
/ metabolism
Time Factors
Becker muscular dystrophy
Duchenne muscular dystrophy
exercise
satellite cells
skeletal muscle
Journal
Journal of applied physiology (Bethesda, Md. : 1985)
ISSN: 1522-1601
Titre abrégé: J Appl Physiol (1985)
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8502536
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
01 02 2019
01 02 2019
Historique:
pubmed:
21
12
2018
medline:
28
4
2020
entrez:
21
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Mutation to the dystrophin gene causes skeletal muscle weakness in patients with Duchenne muscular dystrophy (DMD) or Becker muscular dystrophy (BMD). Deliberation continues regarding implications of prescribing exercise for these patients. The purpose of this study was to determine whether isometric resistance exercise (~10 tetanic contractions/session) improves skeletal muscle strength and histopathology in the mdx mouse model of DMD. Three isometric training sessions increased in vivo isometric torque (22%) and contractility rates (54%) of anterior crural muscles of mdx mice. Mice expressing a BMD-causing missense mutated dystrophin on the mdx background showed comparable increases in torque (22%), while wild-type mice showed less change (11%). Increases in muscle function occurred within 1 h and peaked 3 days posttraining; however, the adaptation was lost after 7 days unless retrained. Six isometric training sessions over 4 wk caused increased isometric torque (28%) and contractility rates (22-28%), reduced fibrosis, as well as greater uniformity of fiber cross-sectional areas, fewer embryonic myosin heavy-chain-positive fibers, and more satellite cells in tibialis anterior muscle compared with the contralateral untrained muscle. Ex vivo functional analysis of isolated extensor digitorum longus (EDL) muscle from the trained hindlimb revealed greater absolute isometric force, lower passive stiffness, and a lower susceptibility to eccentric contraction-induced force loss compared with untrained EDL muscle. Overall, these data support the concept that exercise training in the form of isometric tetanic contractions can improve contractile function of dystrophin-deficient muscle, indicating a potential role for enhancing muscle strength in patients with DMD and BMD. NEW & NOTEWORTHY We focused on adaptive responses of dystrophin-deficient mouse skeletal muscle to isometric contraction training and report that in the absence of dystrophin (or in the presence of a mutated dystrophin), strength and muscle histopathology are improved. Results suggest that the strength gains are associated with fiber hypertrophy, reduced fibrosis, increased number of satellite cells, and blunted eccentric contraction-induced force loss in vitro. Importantly, there was no indication that the isometric exercise training was deleterious to dystrophin-deficient muscle.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30571283
doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00948.2018
pmc: PMC6397410
doi:
Substances chimiques
Dystrophin
0
apo-dystrophin 1
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
363-375Subventions
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR042423
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIAMS NIH HHS
ID : R01 AR049899
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIA NIH HHS
ID : T32 AG029796
Pays : United States
Organisme : NIGMS NIH HHS
ID : T32 GM008244
Pays : United States
Références
Physiotherapy. 1981 Jun;67(6):174-6
pubmed: 7029578
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1994 Apr;76(4):1445-53
pubmed: 8045818
Acta Physiol Scand. 2001 Mar;171(3):359-66
pubmed: 11412149
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1984 Feb;81(4):1189-92
pubmed: 6583703
Methods Mol Biol. 2016;1460:163-79
pubmed: 27492172
Muscle Nerve. 2012 May;45(5):746-51
pubmed: 22499105
J Physiol. 2013 Aug 1;591(15):3765-76
pubmed: 23753524
J Biochem. 1978 Feb;83(2):625-8
pubmed: 632237
Acta Myol. 2005 Dec;24(3):209-16
pubmed: 16629055
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 Feb;80(2):670-9
pubmed: 8929614
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2004 May;96(5):1613-8
pubmed: 15075307
Am J Phys Med. 1979 Feb;58(1):26-36
pubmed: 434131
Science. 2005 Sep 23;309(5743):2064-7
pubmed: 16141372
Hum Mol Genet. 2010 Nov 1;19(21):4145-59
pubmed: 20705734
J Appl Physiol (1985). 1996 May;80(5):1660-5
pubmed: 8727552
Amyotroph Lateral Scler Frontotemporal Degener. 2018 May;19(3-4):250-258
pubmed: 29191052
J Histochem Cytochem. 2000 May;48(5):623-9
pubmed: 10769046
Lancet. 2011 Aug 13;378(9791):595-605
pubmed: 21784508
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Dec;111(6):1768-77
pubmed: 21960659
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2008 Jan 23;(1):CD003725
pubmed: 18254031
Ann Biomed Eng. 2011 Nov;39(11):2706-20
pubmed: 21818535
Muscle Nerve. 2015 Oct;52(4):559-67
pubmed: 25597614
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2012 Sep;44(9):1671-9
pubmed: 22460476
J Pathol. 2011 Jan;223(1):88-98
pubmed: 21125668
J Muscle Res Cell Motil. 1993 Aug;14(4):446-51
pubmed: 7693747
Exp Gerontol. 2005 Dec;40(12):966-75
pubmed: 16243468
Proc Biol Sci. 1993 Jul 22;253(1336):27-33
pubmed: 8396775
Muscle Nerve. 2010 Dec;42(6):871-80
pubmed: 21104862
Hum Gene Ther. 2018 Jul;29(7):733-736
pubmed: 29463117
Atherosclerosis. 2009 Nov;207(1):220-6
pubmed: 19410255
J Physiol. 1999 Mar 1;515 ( Pt 2):609-19
pubmed: 10050026
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2013 Sep 1;115(5):660-6
pubmed: 23823150
J Clin Invest. 2009 Mar;119(3):624-35
pubmed: 19229108
Free Radic Biol Med. 2015 May;82:122-36
pubmed: 25660994
Cell. 1987 Dec 24;51(6):919-28
pubmed: 3319190
J Physiol. 1987 Oct;391:1-11
pubmed: 3443943
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Jun 15;27(12):2090-2100
pubmed: 29618008
Am J Physiol. 1998 Apr;274(4):C1138-44
pubmed: 9575811
Am J Hum Genet. 1991 Jul;49(1):54-67
pubmed: 2063877
J Physiol. 2004 Aug 1;558(Pt 3):1005-12
pubmed: 15218062
J Neurol Sci. 1995 Apr;129(2):97-105
pubmed: 7608742
Mol Ther. 2005 Feb;11(2):245-56
pubmed: 15668136
Muscle Nerve. 2015 May;51(5):697-705
pubmed: 25196721
Neurology. 1975 Dec;25(12):1111-20
pubmed: 1105232
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993 Apr 15;90(8):3710-4
pubmed: 8475120
J Biol Chem. 2003 Apr 18;278(16):13591-4
pubmed: 12556452
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1992 Nov;24(11):1220-7
pubmed: 1435173
Age (Dordr). 2012 Aug;34(4):805-19
pubmed: 21713376
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2007 Jul;103(1):402-11
pubmed: 17446407
JAMA. 1966 Sep 12;197(11):843-8
pubmed: 5952771
Am J Phys Med Rehabil. 1995 Sep-Oct;74(5 Suppl):S93-103
pubmed: 7576425
Sports Med. 2006;36(2):133-49
pubmed: 16464122
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2007 Jan;35(1):12-7
pubmed: 17211188
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2001 Jul;91(1):26-32
pubmed: 11408409
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2011 Jun;110(6):1656-63
pubmed: 21415170
Muscle Nerve. 1999 Feb;22(2):174-85
pubmed: 10024130
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 1988 Oct;20(5 Suppl):S135-45
pubmed: 3057313
J Cell Biol. 1993 Aug;122(4):809-23
pubmed: 8349731
Hum Mol Genet. 2018 Feb 1;27(3):451-462
pubmed: 29194514
Nat Commun. 2018 Nov 30;9(1):5104
pubmed: 30504831
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2006 Feb;100(2):548-59
pubmed: 16254070
Front Physiol. 2015 Sep 09;6:252
pubmed: 26441672
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Sep;50(9):1723-1732
pubmed: 29649068
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Apr 15;111(15):5723-8
pubmed: 24706788