Development, validation and integration of in silico models to identify androgen active chemicals.
Androgen receptor
Artificial neural networks
Decision tree
Endocrine disrupting chemicals
High-throughput screening
In silico
Support vector machine
Journal
Chemosphere
ISSN: 1879-1298
Titre abrégé: Chemosphere
Pays: England
ID NLM: 0320657
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Apr 2019
Apr 2019
Historique:
received:
18
10
2018
revised:
11
12
2018
accepted:
18
12
2018
pubmed:
26
12
2018
medline:
20
4
2019
entrez:
26
12
2018
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
Humans are exposed to large numbers of environmental chemicals, some of which potentially interfere with the endocrine system. The identification of potential endocrine disrupting chemicals (EDCs) has gained increasing priority in the assessment of environmental hazards. The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (U.S. EPA) has developed the Endocrine Disruptor Screening Program (EDSP) which aims to prioritize and screen potential EDCs. The Toxicity Forecaster (ToxCast) program has generated data using in vitro high-throughput screening (HTS) assays measuring activity of chemicals at multiple points along the androgen receptor (AR) activity pathway. In the present study, using a large and diverse data set of 1667 chemicals provided by the U.S. EPA from the combined ToxCast AR assays in the framework of the Collaborative Modeling Project for Androgen Receptor Activity (CoMPARA). Two models were built using ADMET Predictor™; one is based on Artificial Neural Networks (ANNs) technology and the other uses a Support Vector Machine (SVM) algorithm; one model is a Decision Tree (DT) developed in R; and two models make use of differently combined sets of structural alerts (SAs) automatically extracted by SARpy. We used two strategies to integrate predictions from single models; one is based on a majority vote approach and the other on prediction convergence. These strategies led to enhanced statistical performance in most cases. Moreover, the majority vote approach improved prediction coverage when one or more single models were not able to provide any estimations. This study integrates multiple in silico approaches as a virtual screening tool for use in risk assessment of endocrine disrupting chemicals.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30584954
pii: S0045-6535(18)32466-4
doi: 10.1016/j.chemosphere.2018.12.131
pmc: PMC6778835
mid: NIHMS1539792
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Androgens
0
Endocrine Disruptors
0
Receptors, Androgen
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Validation Study
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
204-215Subventions
Organisme : Intramural EPA
ID : EPA999999
Pays : United States
Informations de copyright
Published by Elsevier Ltd.
Références
Toxicol Sci. 2015 Nov;148(1):137-54
pubmed: 26272952
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2013;24(5):365-83
pubmed: 23710765
J Environ Public Health. 2012;2012:713696
pubmed: 22991565
Future Med Chem. 2015;7(14):1921-36
pubmed: 26440057
J Chem Inf Model. 2010 May 24;50(5):861-74
pubmed: 20405856
Molecules. 2012 Apr 25;17(5):4791-810
pubmed: 22534664
Chem Res Toxicol. 2012 Jul 16;25(7):1287-302
pubmed: 22519603
Chemosphere. 2017 Jul;178:99-109
pubmed: 28319747
J Steroid Biochem Mol Biol. 1998 Apr;65(1-6):143-50
pubmed: 9699867
Toxicol Sci. 2007 Jan;95(1):5-12
pubmed: 16963515
SAR QSAR Environ Res. 2008;19(7-8):697-733
pubmed: 19061085
Chem Res Toxicol. 2016 Aug 15;29(8):1225-51
pubmed: 27367298
Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Jul;124(7):1023-33
pubmed: 26908244
Cancer. 1950 Jan;3(1):32-5
pubmed: 15405679
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Apr;121(4):A104-6
pubmed: 23548368
Vitam Horm. 2014;94:193-210
pubmed: 24388191
Toxicol Sci. 2016 Oct;153(2):316-26
pubmed: 27413112
Endocr Rev. 2012 Jun;33(3):378-455
pubmed: 22419778
Chem Res Toxicol. 2017 Apr 17;30(4):946-964
pubmed: 27933809
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2011 Jun;8(6):2265-303
pubmed: 21776230
Chem Res Toxicol. 2003 Oct;16(10):1338-58
pubmed: 14565775
ALTEX. 2017 Sep 18;35(2):169-178
pubmed: 28922667
Environ Health Perspect. 2013 Jul;121(7):756-65
pubmed: 23603828