Inter- and intrapatient heterogeneity of indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase expression in primary and metastatic melanoma cells and the tumour microenvironment.


Journal

Histopathology
ISSN: 1365-2559
Titre abrégé: Histopathology
Pays: England
ID NLM: 7704136

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
May 2019
Historique:
received: 14 11 2018
accepted: 23 12 2018
pubmed: 28 12 2018
medline: 23 8 2019
entrez: 28 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Indoleamine 2,3-dioxygenase (IDO), an immunomodulatory enzyme, facilitates immune escape by tumours and promotes tumour progression. IDO inhibitors with and without additional anti-PD-1 therapy have been evaluated in recent and ongoing melanoma clinical trials, but IDO expression in melanoma tumours, and therefore its potential role as a predictive biomarker remains unknown. This study sought to evaluate IDO expression in immunotherapy-naive metastatic melanoma patients in order to determine patterns of expression in corresponding primary melanomas, locoregional metastases and distant metastases. Here, we evaluated IDO expression using immunohistochemistry in 99 melanoma tumour samples from 43 immunotherapy-naive patients with metastatic melanoma to determine patterns of expression in primary melanomas (n = 29), locoregional metastases (n = 36) and distant metastases (n = 34). Thirty-seven per cent of patients demonstrated tumour IDO expression in at least one specimen. Twelve of 35 patients (34%) with longitudinal specimens (i.e. two or more separate specimens from different disease stages in the same patient) displayed heterogeneous IDO staining between samples. Tumour IDO expression positively correlated with tumour-infiltrating lymphocyte (TIL) score as well as the number of IDO-expressing mononuclear cells in the primary melanoma (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.0011, respectively) and nodal metastases (P = 0.049 and P = 0.037, respectively), but not in distant metastases. Furthermore, tumour IDO expression correlated positively with PD-L1 expression by melanoma cells among all specimens (P = 0.0073). Therefore, while assessment of tumour IDO expression warrants evaluation in melanoma patient cohorts treated with IDO inhibitors dosed at levels proven to inhibit the target by pharmacodynamic assessment, its utility as a biomarker may be limited by intertumoral heterogeneity.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30589949
doi: 10.1111/his.13814
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers, Tumor 0
Indoleamine-Pyrrole 2,3,-Dioxygenase 0

Types de publication

Journal Article

Langues

eng

Pagination

817-828

Subventions

Organisme : Melanoma Foundation of the University of Sydney
Organisme : National Health and Medical Research Council
ID : APP1093017
Organisme : University of Sydney PhD Scholarship
Organisme : Janet Ferguson MIA PhD Scholarship
Organisme : Cancer Institute NSW
Organisme : Melanoma Institute Australia
Organisme : New South Wales Department of Health
Organisme : NSW Health Pathology

Informations de copyright

© 2018 John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

Auteurs

Tuba N Gide (TN)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Benjamin M Allanson (BM)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Alexander M Menzies (AM)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia.

Peter M Ferguson (PM)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Jason Madore (J)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Robyn P M Saw (RPM)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

John F Thompson (JF)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Georgina V Long (GV)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Royal North Shore Hospital, Sydney, Australia.
Mater Hospital, North Sydney, Australia.

James S Wilmott (JS)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.

Richard A Scolyer (RA)

Melanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Charles Perkins Centre, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Sydney Medical School, The University of Sydney, Sydney, Australia.
Royal Prince Alfred Hospital, Sydney, Australia.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH