Cardiorenal status using amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide and cystatin C on cardiac resynchronization therapy outcomes: From the BIOCRT Study.


Journal

Heart rhythm
ISSN: 1556-3871
Titre abrégé: Heart Rhythm
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 101200317

Informations de publication

Date de publication:
06 2019
Historique:
received: 02 11 2018
pubmed: 28 12 2018
medline: 31 10 2020
entrez: 28 12 2018
Statut: ppublish

Résumé

Cardiorenal syndrome comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by acute or chronic cardiac and renal dysfunction. The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cardiorenal status using a dual-marker strategy with amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cystatin C on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes. In 92 patients (age 66 ± 13 years; 80% male; left ventricular ejection fraction 26% ± 7%), NT-proBNP and cystatin C levels were measured at CRT implantation and at 1 month. NT-proBNP >1000 pg/mL and cystatin C >1 mg/L were considered high. Baseline cardiorenal patients were defined as having high NT-proBNP and cystatin C. At 1 month, CRT patients were categorized as (1) irreversible cardiorenal if cystatin C was persistently high; (2) progressive cardiorenal with transition from low to high cystatin C; (3) reversible cardiorenal with transition from high to low cystatin C; and (4) "normal" with stable low cystatin C. Outcomes were 6-month clinical and echocardiographic CRT response and 2 -year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE). Compared to patients with low NT-proBNP and cystatin C, cardiorenal patients had >9-fold increase risk of CRT nonresponse (odds ratio uncompensated 9.0; compensated 36.4; both P ≤.004) and >6-fold risk of MACE (hazard ratio uncompensated 8.5; P = .005). Compared to "normal" and reversible patients (referent), irreversible patients had a 9-fold increase for CRT nonresponse (odds ratio 9.1; P <.001) and had >4-fold risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio 5.1; P <.001). Irreversible patients were most likely echocardiographic CRT nonresponders. Cardiorenal status by NT-proBNP and cystatin C can identify high-risk CRT patients, and those with both elevated concentrations have worse prognosis.

Sections du résumé

BACKGROUND
Cardiorenal syndrome comprises a heterogeneous group of disorders characterized by acute or chronic cardiac and renal dysfunction.
OBJECTIVE
The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of cardiorenal status using a dual-marker strategy with amino-terminal pro-brain natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) and cystatin C on cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) outcomes.
METHODS
In 92 patients (age 66 ± 13 years; 80% male; left ventricular ejection fraction 26% ± 7%), NT-proBNP and cystatin C levels were measured at CRT implantation and at 1 month. NT-proBNP >1000 pg/mL and cystatin C >1 mg/L were considered high. Baseline cardiorenal patients were defined as having high NT-proBNP and cystatin C. At 1 month, CRT patients were categorized as (1) irreversible cardiorenal if cystatin C was persistently high; (2) progressive cardiorenal with transition from low to high cystatin C; (3) reversible cardiorenal with transition from high to low cystatin C; and (4) "normal" with stable low cystatin C. Outcomes were 6-month clinical and echocardiographic CRT response and 2 -year major adverse cardiovascular event (MACE).
RESULTS
Compared to patients with low NT-proBNP and cystatin C, cardiorenal patients had >9-fold increase risk of CRT nonresponse (odds ratio uncompensated 9.0; compensated 36.4; both P ≤.004) and >6-fold risk of MACE (hazard ratio uncompensated 8.5; P = .005). Compared to "normal" and reversible patients (referent), irreversible patients had a 9-fold increase for CRT nonresponse (odds ratio 9.1; P <.001) and had >4-fold risk of MACE (adjusted hazard ratio 5.1; P <.001). Irreversible patients were most likely echocardiographic CRT nonresponders.
CONCLUSION
Cardiorenal status by NT-proBNP and cystatin C can identify high-risk CRT patients, and those with both elevated concentrations have worse prognosis.

Identifiants

pubmed: 30590191
pii: S1547-5271(18)31289-X
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2018.12.023
pmc: PMC6545247
mid: NIHMS1517384
pii:
doi:

Substances chimiques

Biomarkers 0
Cystatin C 0
Peptide Fragments 0
pro-brain natriuretic peptide (1-76) 0
Natriuretic Peptide, Brain 114471-18-0

Types de publication

Journal Article Observational Study Research Support, N.I.H., Extramural Research Support, Non-U.S. Gov't

Langues

eng

Sous-ensembles de citation

IM

Pagination

928-935

Subventions

Organisme : NHLBI NIH HHS
ID : K23 HL098370
Pays : United States

Informations de copyright

Copyright © 2018 Heart Rhythm Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Références

J Card Fail. 2001 Jun;7(2):176-82
pubmed: 11420770
Clin Chem. 2002 May;48(5):699-707
pubmed: 11978596
Am J Kidney Dis. 2002 Aug;40(2):221-6
pubmed: 12148093
Ann Clin Biochem. 2003 Nov;40(Pt 6):648-55
pubmed: 14629803
Arch Intern Med. 2004 Mar 22;164(6):659-63
pubmed: 15037495
N Engl J Med. 2005 May 19;352(20):2049-60
pubmed: 15901858
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Feb 7;47(3):582-6
pubmed: 16458140
Ann Intern Med. 2006 Aug 15;145(4):247-54
pubmed: 16908915
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2006 Oct 17;48(8):1621-7
pubmed: 17045898
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008 Nov 4;52(19):1527-39
pubmed: 19007588
Eur Heart J. 2011 Jan;32(2):184-90
pubmed: 21068051
Circulation. 2011 May 10;123(18):2015-9
pubmed: 21555724
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2011 Oct 25;58(18):1881-9
pubmed: 22018299
Arch Cardiovasc Dis. 2011 Nov;104(11):565-71
pubmed: 22117908
Eur Heart J. 2012 Sep;33(17):2181-8
pubmed: 22613342
Clin Cardiol. 2012 Dec;35(12):777-80
pubmed: 22886700
Circ Heart Fail. 2012 Sep 1;5(5):602-9
pubmed: 22899766
Clin J Am Soc Nephrol. 2013 Aug;8(8):1293-303
pubmed: 23660183
Brain Behav Immun. 2014 Aug;40:211-8
pubmed: 24704567
PLoS One. 2014 Apr 14;9(4):e94614
pubmed: 24732141
Heart Rhythm. 2014 Dec;11(12):2167-75
pubmed: 25014756
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Jun 9;65(22):2433-48
pubmed: 26046738
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol. 2015 Oct;38(10):1192-200
pubmed: 26179289
J Am Coll Cardiol. 2015 Dec 15;66(23):2618-2629
pubmed: 26670062
Int J Cardiol. 2016 Feb 15;205:43-49
pubmed: 26710332
J Am Coll Cardiol. 1995 Apr;25(5):1105-10
pubmed: 7897123
Lancet. 1998 Jan 3;351(9095):9-13
pubmed: 9433422

Auteurs

Quynh A Truong (QA)

Department of Radiology and Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York; Department of Biostatistics, New York University, New York, New York. Electronic address: qat9001@med.cornell.edu.

Jackie Szymonifka (J)

Department of Biostatistics, New York University, New York, New York.

James L Januzzi (JL)

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Jigar H Contractor (JH)

Department of Medicine, New York-Presbyterian Hospital and Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, New York.

Roderick C Deaño (RC)

Department of Medicine, Division of Cardiovascular Medicine, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health, Madison, Wisconsin.

Neal A Chatterjee (NA)

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Jagmeet P Singh (JP)

Division of Cardiology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Articles similaires

[Redispensing of expensive oral anticancer medicines: a practical application].

Lisanne N van Merendonk, Kübra Akgöl, Bastiaan Nuijen
1.00
Humans Antineoplastic Agents Administration, Oral Drug Costs Counterfeit Drugs

Smoking Cessation and Incident Cardiovascular Disease.

Jun Hwan Cho, Seung Yong Shin, Hoseob Kim et al.
1.00
Humans Male Smoking Cessation Cardiovascular Diseases Female
Humans United States Aged Cross-Sectional Studies Medicare Part C
1.00
Humans Yoga Low Back Pain Female Male

Classifications MeSH