Intramuscular oxytocin versus oxytocin/ergometrine versus carbetocin for prevention of primary postpartum haemorrhage after vaginal birth: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (the IMox study).
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Data Collection
Double-Blind Method
Drug Combinations
Ergonovine
/ administration & dosage
Humans
Injections, Intramuscular
Multicenter Studies as Topic
Outcome Assessment, Health Care
Oxytocin
/ administration & dosage
Postpartum Hemorrhage
/ prevention & control
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Sample Size
Carbetocin
Oxytocin
Oxytocin/ergometrine
Postpartum haemorrhage
Prevention
Primary
Journal
Trials
ISSN: 1745-6215
Titre abrégé: Trials
Pays: England
ID NLM: 101263253
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
03 Jan 2019
03 Jan 2019
Historique:
received:
11
07
2018
accepted:
06
12
2018
entrez:
5
1
2019
pubmed:
5
1
2019
medline:
29
5
2019
Statut:
epublish
Résumé
Postpartum haemorrhage remains a major cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Active management of the third stage of labour reduces the risk of postpartum haemorrhage. Oxytocin and oxytocin/ergometrine are commonly used in the UK, with oxytocin/ergometrine being more effective at preventing moderate, but not severe, blood loss. Many guidelines specifically recommend using oxytocin for all vaginal births, as it is associated with fewer adverse events. However, a survey conducted by the Southmead Hospital Maternity Research Team revealed that 71.4% of UK obstetric units still routinely use oxytocin/ergometrine. Carbetocin is a newer medication that may be as effective but has fewer side effects. No studies have directly compared all three medications. The IMox study aims to determine the most effective, acceptable and cost-effective drug for primary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal birth. The IMox study is a prospective, multi-centre, double-blind, randomised trial directly comparing oxytocin, oxytocin/ergometrine and carbetocin given intramuscularly for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage in the third stage of labour. The primary effectiveness outcome is the use of an additional uterotonic drug. Secondary effectiveness outcomes reflect maternal morbidity and mortality within the immediate postpartum period. Participant questionnaires and subjective reporting of side effects will be used to evaluate maternal acceptability. Maternal quality of life utilities will be collected antenatally, and on days 1 and 14 after birth to enable a cost-effectiveness assessment of each studied drug. Participants will be pregnant women planning a vaginal birth in six hospitals in England. Participants will be approached and invited to provide consent to participate from 20 weeks gestation until in established labour. A complete sample of 5712 participants (1904 per arm) providing data for the primary outcome will allow for a robust determination of efficacy between all three study drugs. Data will be collected until participants are discharged from the hospital and on postnatal days 1 and 14 regardless of location. All analyses will be on a modified intention-to-treat basis, and additionally repeated on a per protocol basis. Data collection commenced in Feburary 2015 and was completed in August 2018. This study is the first to directly compare oxytocin, oxytocin/ergometrine and carbetocin in the same population for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal birth. Furthermore, this study will be the first to directly compute health economic outcomes from such a three-way comparison. This study is limited to using short-term outcomes, and so will not provide evidence for important outcomes such as long-term maternal psychological well-being and time to next conception. ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02216383 . Registered on 18 August 2014. EudraCT, 2014-001948-37. Registered on 23 September 2014. ISRCTN, ISRCTN10232550. Retrospectively registered on 6 March 2018).
Sections du résumé
BACKGROUND
BACKGROUND
Postpartum haemorrhage remains a major cause of maternal mortality and morbidity worldwide. Active management of the third stage of labour reduces the risk of postpartum haemorrhage. Oxytocin and oxytocin/ergometrine are commonly used in the UK, with oxytocin/ergometrine being more effective at preventing moderate, but not severe, blood loss. Many guidelines specifically recommend using oxytocin for all vaginal births, as it is associated with fewer adverse events. However, a survey conducted by the Southmead Hospital Maternity Research Team revealed that 71.4% of UK obstetric units still routinely use oxytocin/ergometrine. Carbetocin is a newer medication that may be as effective but has fewer side effects. No studies have directly compared all three medications.
METHODS
METHODS
The IMox study aims to determine the most effective, acceptable and cost-effective drug for primary prevention of postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal birth. The IMox study is a prospective, multi-centre, double-blind, randomised trial directly comparing oxytocin, oxytocin/ergometrine and carbetocin given intramuscularly for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage in the third stage of labour. The primary effectiveness outcome is the use of an additional uterotonic drug. Secondary effectiveness outcomes reflect maternal morbidity and mortality within the immediate postpartum period. Participant questionnaires and subjective reporting of side effects will be used to evaluate maternal acceptability. Maternal quality of life utilities will be collected antenatally, and on days 1 and 14 after birth to enable a cost-effectiveness assessment of each studied drug. Participants will be pregnant women planning a vaginal birth in six hospitals in England. Participants will be approached and invited to provide consent to participate from 20 weeks gestation until in established labour. A complete sample of 5712 participants (1904 per arm) providing data for the primary outcome will allow for a robust determination of efficacy between all three study drugs. Data will be collected until participants are discharged from the hospital and on postnatal days 1 and 14 regardless of location. All analyses will be on a modified intention-to-treat basis, and additionally repeated on a per protocol basis. Data collection commenced in Feburary 2015 and was completed in August 2018.
DISCUSSION
CONCLUSIONS
This study is the first to directly compare oxytocin, oxytocin/ergometrine and carbetocin in the same population for the prevention of postpartum haemorrhage following vaginal birth. Furthermore, this study will be the first to directly compute health economic outcomes from such a three-way comparison. This study is limited to using short-term outcomes, and so will not provide evidence for important outcomes such as long-term maternal psychological well-being and time to next conception.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
BACKGROUND
ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT02216383 . Registered on 18 August 2014. EudraCT, 2014-001948-37. Registered on 23 September 2014. ISRCTN, ISRCTN10232550. Retrospectively registered on 6 March 2018).
Identifiants
pubmed: 30606246
doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-3109-2
pii: 10.1186/s13063-018-3109-2
pmc: PMC6319006
doi:
Substances chimiques
Drug Combinations
0
Oxytocin
50-56-6
carbetocin
88TWF8015Y
Ergonovine
WH41D8433D
Banques de données
ClinicalTrials.gov
['NCT02216383']
Types de publication
Clinical Trial Protocol
Journal Article
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
4Références
Stat Med. 1999 Aug 15;18(15):1903-42
pubmed: 10440877
J Midwifery Womens Health. 2004 Jan-Feb;49(1):76-7
pubmed: 14710151
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2004;(1):CD000201
pubmed: 14973949
Health Econ. 2005 May;14(5):487-96
pubmed: 15497198
Stat Med. 2006 May 30;25(10):1628-38
pubmed: 16639773
BJOG. 2006 Aug;113(8):919-24
pubmed: 16907938
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 1991 Jan 30;38(2):119-24
pubmed: 1995380
Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;53(1):147-56
pubmed: 20142652
BMJ. 2010 Mar 23;340:c332
pubmed: 20332509
Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2011 Aug;51(4):365-71
pubmed: 21806578
Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7
pubmed: 23295957
Lancet Glob Health. 2014 Jun;2(6):e323-33
pubmed: 25103301
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Mar 02;(3):CD007412
pubmed: 25730178
BJOG. 2017 Apr;124(5):e106-e149
pubmed: 27981719
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Apr 25;4:CD011689
pubmed: 29693726
BJOG. 2019 Jan;126(1):83-93
pubmed: 29920912
N Engl J Med. 2018 Aug 23;379(8):743-752
pubmed: 29949473
Eur J Pharmacol. 1998 Aug 21;355(2-3):203-10
pubmed: 9760035