A systematic review of infected descending thoracic aortic grafts and endografts.
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Anti-Bacterial Agents
/ therapeutic use
Aorta, Thoracic
/ surgery
Blood Vessel Prosthesis
/ adverse effects
Blood Vessel Prosthesis Implantation
/ adverse effects
Device Removal
/ adverse effects
Endovascular Procedures
/ adverse effects
Female
Humans
Male
Middle Aged
Prosthesis-Related Infections
/ diagnosis
Reoperation
Risk Factors
Stents
/ adverse effects
Time Factors
Treatment Outcome
Blood vessel prosthesis
Endovascular procedures
Esophageal fistula
Fistula
Infection
Respiratory fistula
Surgery
Thoracic aorta
Journal
Journal of vascular surgery
ISSN: 1097-6809
Titre abrégé: J Vasc Surg
Pays: United States
ID NLM: 8407742
Informations de publication
Date de publication:
Jun 2019
Jun 2019
Historique:
received:
01
05
2018
accepted:
26
10
2018
pubmed:
5
1
2019
medline:
19
11
2019
entrez:
5
1
2019
Statut:
ppublish
Résumé
The objective of this study was to collect and critically analyze the current evidence on the modalities and results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic surgical graft (SG) and endograft (EG) infection, which represents a rare but dramatic complication after both surgical and endovascular aortic repair. A comprehensive electronic health database search (PubMed/MEDLINE, Scopus, Google Scholar, and the Cochrane Library) identified all articles that were published up to October 2017 reporting on thoracic aortic SG or EG infection. Observational studies, multicenter reports, single-center series and case reports, case-control studies, and guidelines were considered eligible if reporting specific results of treatment of descending thoracic aortic SG or EG infection. Comparisons of patients presenting with SG or EG infection and between invasive and conservative treatment were performed. Odds ratio (OR) meta-analyses were run when comparative data were available. Forty-three studies reporting on 233 patients with infected SG (49) or EG (184) were included. Four were multicenter studies including 107 patients, all with EG infection, associated with a fistula in 91% of cases, with a reported overall survival at 2 years of 16% to 39%. The remaining 39 single-center studies included 49 patients with SG infection and 77 with EG infection. Association with aortoesophageal fistula was significantly more common with EG (60% vs 31%; P = .01). In addition, time interval from index procedure to infection was significantly shorter with EG (17 ± 21 months vs 32 ± 61 months; P = .03). Meta-analysis showed a trend of increased 1-year mortality in patients with SG infection compared with EG infection (pooled OR, 3.6; 95% confidence interval, 0.9-14.7; P = .073). Surgical management with infected graft explantation was associated with a trend toward lower 1-year mortality compared with graft preservation (pooled OR, 0.3; 95% confidence interval, 0.1-1.0; P = .056). Thoracic aortic EG infection is likely to occur more frequently in association with aortoesophageal fistulas and in a shorter time compared with SG infection. Survival is poor in both groups, especially in patients with SG infection. Surgical treatment with graft explantation seems to be the preferable choice in fit patients.
Identifiants
pubmed: 30606664
pii: S0741-5214(18)32573-4
doi: 10.1016/j.jvs.2018.10.108
pii:
doi:
Substances chimiques
Anti-Bacterial Agents
0
Types de publication
Journal Article
Meta-Analysis
Systematic Review
Langues
eng
Sous-ensembles de citation
IM
Pagination
1941-1951.e1Informations de copyright
Copyright © 2018 Society for Vascular Surgery. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.